On a typical Wednesday afternoon, Sandra Mitchell, a 57-year-old retired librarian from Ohio, finds herself at her kitchen table, enjoying a cup of tea while scrolling through her tablet. Sandra represents a demographic that embodies a curious paradox concerning artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: despite a prevailing scepticism, they nonetheless engage with it, often without realising. According to recent findings from a University of Michigan poll, this duality is widespread among Americans aged 50 and older, who navigate the often bewildering landscape of digital health information with both caution and necessity.
In a recent interview, Sandra shared her thoughts on AI-generated health information, providing a glimpse into the mindset of many in her age group. Her perspective closely mirrors the sentiments captured in the study—a blend of distrust and dependency. “I just don’t trust AI when it comes to my health,” Sandra candidly admitted. “It’s not that I’m against technology. I use my phone, my computer, and even have a smart speaker. But when it comes to something as personal as my health, I prefer advice from people.”
This hesitance is not unique to Sandra. The poll reveals that a vast majority of her peers echo her feelings, with 84% still leaning heavily on healthcare providers, pharmacists, or family and friends for medical advice. This preference highlights a cultural and generational inclination towards human interaction in healthcare, despite the conveniences offered by the digital age. Yet, Sandra paradoxically confesses to consulting online platforms like WebMD and Healthline for quick answers. “It’s a starting point,” she concedes, “but I always double-check with my doctor or pharmacist. Sometimes, you need something right away, and these sites are right there.”
This behaviour underscores a compelling contradiction: while mistrust in AI-generated health information exists, it does not completely deter its usage. Like many others, Sandra seems to trust her ability to discern credible information from the vast sea of online data. Yet, she also acknowledges the challenge of navigating the overwhelming array of health advice available on the internet—an experience shared by 68% of her peers, according to the poll. When questioned about the accuracy of these online sources, Sandra expressed confidence in her judgement, stating, “I trust myself to know what’s good and what’s not.” However, this reliance on personal discernment may not always yield the best outcomes, given that studies have shown the diagnostic accuracy of platforms like WebMD can be highly variable.
During our conversation, Sandra reflected on the media’s role in shaping perceptions of AI. She noted how negative portrayals, particularly concerning social media manipulation, have influenced her viewpoint. “You always hear about how AI is used to manipulate things online. It’s hard not to let that affect how you see it in other areas,” she remarked. Yet, her scepticism does not extend to all AI applications. She expressed admiration for AI’s contributions to fields such as drug development and medical imaging. “If it’s used behind the scenes, to help doctors do their job better, that’s fine. It’s just the idea of a computer telling me what’s wrong with me that feels off.”
Sandra’s nuanced perspective reveals a crucial insight from the Michigan study: the distrust is not inherently directed at AI itself but rather at the context in which it is perceived to function. The discomfort appears most pronounced when AI applications are directly involved in personal decision-making, as opposed to supporting professionals in their work. As our discussion drew to a close, Sandra acknowledged the inevitability of AI’s growing role in healthcare. “I suppose we’ll have to get used to it. Things are moving that way, whether we like it or not. I just hope they keep people in the loop.”
Leaving Sandra’s home, I was struck by the intricate relationship between AI and older Americans. Though technology is already woven into many facets of their daily lives, from smart devices to online platforms, there remains a discernible reluctance to wholly embrace it within the healthcare domain. The University of Michigan study highlights more than a generational divide; it underscores an urgent need for improved communication and education regarding AI’s potential and limitations in healthcare. For individuals like Sandra, a deeper understanding of AI’s capabilities could be pivotal in bridging the trust gap. Until then, the human touch remains the benchmark for health advice among many older Americans.
Be the first to comment