Clinician Burnout in the 21st Century: Prevalence, Etiology, Consequences, and Emerging Mitigation Strategies

Clinician Burnout in the 21st Century: Prevalence, Etiology, Consequences, and Emerging Mitigation Strategies

Abstract

Clinician burnout is a pervasive and escalating crisis within healthcare systems globally. Characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment, burnout negatively impacts both individual clinician well-being and the quality of patient care. This research report provides a comprehensive overview of clinician burnout, encompassing its prevalence across various healthcare specialties, a detailed examination of its multifaceted etiology, a critical analysis of its far-reaching consequences, and an exploration of emerging mitigation strategies. The report synthesizes existing literature, incorporating quantitative and qualitative studies, to offer insights into the complex interplay of factors contributing to burnout. It delves into organizational, occupational, and individual-level contributors, emphasizing the role of workload, administrative burden, moral distress, and lack of autonomy. Furthermore, the report critically assesses traditional interventions aimed at mitigating burnout, such as mindfulness training and workload reduction, and explores the potential of innovative technological solutions, including artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools, to alleviate administrative burden and improve clinician well-being. Finally, the report addresses ethical considerations surrounding the implementation of AI in healthcare and advocates for a holistic approach to addressing clinician burnout that prioritizes both technological advancements and a fundamental shift in healthcare culture to promote clinician autonomy, well-being, and resilience.

1. Introduction

Clinician burnout is no longer a marginal concern within healthcare; it represents a systemic crisis with profound implications for patient safety, quality of care, and the long-term sustainability of healthcare systems. The phenomenon, initially described by Freudenberger in the 1970s [1], has since been extensively studied and redefined by Maslach and colleagues as a syndrome characterized by three key dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization (cynicism), and reduced personal accomplishment [2]. Emotional exhaustion refers to feelings of being emotionally overextended and depleted of one’s emotional resources. Depersonalization, or cynicism, involves developing a detached and negative attitude towards patients and one’s work. Reduced personal accomplishment is characterized by a sense of ineffectiveness and a lack of achievement in one’s work.

The consequences of clinician burnout are far-reaching. Burned-out clinicians are more likely to make medical errors [3], experience decreased job satisfaction [4], and exhibit increased rates of absenteeism and turnover [5]. Furthermore, burnout is associated with adverse personal outcomes, including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and even suicidal ideation [6]. The economic burden of clinician burnout is also substantial, encompassing costs related to recruitment, training, and lost productivity [7]. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the problem, placing unprecedented demands on healthcare professionals and leading to a surge in burnout rates [8].

Addressing clinician burnout requires a multi-faceted approach that considers the complex interplay of organizational, occupational, and individual factors. Traditional interventions, such as stress management programs and workload reduction strategies, have shown limited success in achieving sustained reductions in burnout [9]. Emerging technological solutions, particularly those leveraging artificial intelligence, offer promising avenues for alleviating administrative burden and improving clinician well-being. However, the implementation of AI in healthcare must be approached with caution, considering ethical implications and the importance of maintaining human oversight and empathy. This research report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of clinician burnout, exploring its prevalence, etiology, consequences, and emerging mitigation strategies. By synthesizing existing literature and critically analyzing innovative approaches, this report seeks to inform policy decisions, guide organizational interventions, and promote a culture of clinician well-being within healthcare systems.

2. Prevalence of Clinician Burnout

The prevalence of clinician burnout varies significantly depending on specialty, work setting, and methodological approaches used in research studies. However, a consistent trend across studies indicates that burnout rates are alarmingly high across the healthcare professions. A meta-analysis published in Archives of Internal Medicine found that approximately 50% of physicians experience burnout [10]. Similarly, studies involving nurses have reported burnout prevalence rates ranging from 30% to 70% [11].

Certain specialties appear to be particularly vulnerable to burnout. Emergency medicine physicians, critical care physicians, and primary care physicians consistently report higher rates of burnout compared to other specialties [12]. These specialties are characterized by high patient volumes, demanding workloads, exposure to trauma, and significant administrative burden. Furthermore, mental health professionals, including psychiatrists and psychologists, also experience elevated rates of burnout due to the emotionally taxing nature of their work and the constant exposure to human suffering [13].

The geographic location and healthcare system structure also influence burnout prevalence. Studies conducted in the United States have generally reported higher burnout rates compared to those conducted in Europe or Canada [14]. This difference may be attributed to variations in healthcare financing models, regulatory environments, and cultural attitudes towards work-life balance. Moreover, clinicians working in rural or underserved areas often face additional challenges, such as limited resources, professional isolation, and increased workload, which can contribute to higher burnout rates [15].

The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated the issue, leading to a significant increase in burnout rates across all healthcare professions. A recent survey of healthcare workers conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that over 50% reported experiencing burnout as a result of the pandemic [16]. The unprecedented demands on healthcare systems, coupled with the emotional toll of caring for critically ill patients and the fear of infection, have created a perfect storm for clinician burnout.

3. Etiology of Clinician Burnout: A Multifaceted Perspective

The etiology of clinician burnout is complex and multifaceted, encompassing organizational, occupational, and individual-level factors. Understanding these contributing factors is crucial for developing effective interventions aimed at mitigating burnout.

3.1 Organizational Factors

Organizational factors play a significant role in contributing to clinician burnout. These factors include:

• Workload: Excessive workload and long working hours are consistently associated with higher rates of burnout. Clinicians who are constantly under pressure to see more patients, complete more paperwork, and work longer shifts are more likely to experience emotional exhaustion and depersonalization [17].
• Administrative Burden: The increasing administrative burden imposed on clinicians, including documentation requirements, prior authorizations, and quality reporting measures, significantly contributes to burnout. Spending excessive time on administrative tasks detracts from patient care and increases feelings of frustration and inefficiency [18].
• Lack of Autonomy: Clinicians who feel that they have limited control over their work environment and clinical decisions are more likely to experience burnout. Lack of autonomy can lead to feelings of powerlessness and a sense of being a cog in a machine [19].
• Poor Communication: Ineffective communication between clinicians, administrators, and other healthcare professionals can contribute to misunderstandings, conflict, and a lack of teamwork, all of which can exacerbate burnout [20].
• Lack of Support: Insufficient support from colleagues, supervisors, and the organization as a whole can leave clinicians feeling isolated and overwhelmed. Lack of support can also hinder their ability to cope with stress and manage challenging situations [21].
• Toxic Work Environment: Workplace bullying, discrimination, and harassment can create a toxic work environment that significantly contributes to burnout. Exposure to such behaviors can undermine clinicians’ self-esteem, erode their sense of belonging, and increase their risk of experiencing emotional exhaustion and depersonalization [22].

3.2 Occupational Factors

Occupational factors related to the nature of clinical work also contribute to burnout. These factors include:

• Emotional Demands: Clinical work often involves exposure to human suffering, death, and emotionally challenging situations. Clinicians who are constantly exposed to such stressors are at risk of developing emotional exhaustion and compassion fatigue [23].
• Moral Distress: Moral distress occurs when clinicians feel that they are unable to provide the care that they believe is ethically appropriate due to organizational constraints or conflicting values. Experiencing moral distress can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, and powerlessness, which can contribute to burnout [24].
• Role Ambiguity: Clinicians who are unclear about their roles and responsibilities are more likely to experience burnout. Role ambiguity can lead to confusion, frustration, and a sense of being overwhelmed [25].
• Work-Life Imbalance: The demanding nature of clinical work often makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Working long hours, being on call frequently, and constantly dealing with patient emergencies can encroach on personal time and lead to feelings of stress and exhaustion [26].

3.3 Individual Factors

Individual characteristics and coping mechanisms can also influence susceptibility to burnout. These factors include:

• Personality Traits: Certain personality traits, such as perfectionism, high achievement orientation, and a strong need for control, can increase vulnerability to burnout. Individuals with these traits may be more likely to overwork themselves, set unrealistic expectations, and struggle to cope with stress [27].
• Coping Styles: The coping strategies that clinicians employ to deal with stress can either mitigate or exacerbate burnout. Adaptive coping strategies, such as seeking social support, engaging in problem-solving, and practicing self-care, can help to buffer against the effects of stress. Maladaptive coping strategies, such as denial, avoidance, and substance abuse, can worsen burnout [28].
• Lack of Self-Care: Clinicians who neglect their own physical and emotional needs are more likely to experience burnout. Failing to prioritize self-care activities, such as getting enough sleep, eating healthy, exercising regularly, and engaging in hobbies, can deplete energy reserves and increase vulnerability to stress [29].
• Lack of Resilience: Resilience, the ability to bounce back from adversity, is an important protective factor against burnout. Clinicians who lack resilience may be more easily overwhelmed by stress and less able to cope with challenging situations [30].

4. Consequences of Clinician Burnout

The consequences of clinician burnout extend beyond individual clinician well-being, impacting patient care, healthcare organizations, and the healthcare system as a whole.

4.1 Impact on Clinician Well-being

Burnout has profound negative effects on clinicians’ physical and mental health. Burned-out clinicians are more likely to experience:

• Depression and Anxiety: Burnout is strongly associated with increased risk of depression and anxiety disorders. The emotional exhaustion and cynicism characteristic of burnout can lead to feelings of hopelessness, worthlessness, and persistent worry [31].
• Substance Abuse: Burned-out clinicians are more likely to engage in substance abuse, including alcohol and drug use, as a means of coping with stress and emotional pain [32].
• Sleep Disturbances: Burnout can disrupt sleep patterns, leading to insomnia, fatigue, and impaired cognitive function [33].
• Cardiovascular Disease: Chronic stress associated with burnout can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, and stroke [34].
• Suicidal Ideation: In severe cases, burnout can lead to suicidal ideation and even suicide. The feelings of hopelessness, despair, and isolation that accompany burnout can increase the risk of self-harm [35].

4.2 Impact on Patient Care

Burnout negatively impacts the quality and safety of patient care. Burned-out clinicians are more likely to:

• Make Medical Errors: Burnout impairs cognitive function, attention, and decision-making, increasing the likelihood of medical errors. Studies have shown a direct correlation between clinician burnout and increased rates of medication errors, diagnostic errors, and procedural errors [36].
• Provide Lower Quality Care: Burned-out clinicians may provide less empathetic, less thorough, and less patient-centered care. They may be less likely to listen to patients’ concerns, less likely to provide adequate explanations, and less likely to follow best practices [37].
• Exhibit Decreased Productivity: Burnout can lead to decreased productivity, as clinicians may be less motivated to work and more likely to take sick leave. Decreased productivity can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to care, and increased costs [38].
• Experience Reduced Professionalism: Burnout can erode professional conduct, as clinicians may become cynical, detached, and disrespectful towards patients and colleagues [39].

4.3 Impact on Healthcare Organizations

Clinician burnout has significant financial and operational consequences for healthcare organizations. Burnout contributes to:

• Increased Turnover: Burned-out clinicians are more likely to leave their jobs, resulting in increased turnover rates. High turnover rates can disrupt patient care, increase recruitment and training costs, and decrease organizational morale [40].
• Absenteeism: Burned-out clinicians are more likely to take sick leave, leading to increased absenteeism. Absenteeism can strain staffing resources, increase workload for remaining clinicians, and disrupt patient care [41].
• Decreased Productivity: As mentioned previously, burnout leads to decreased productivity, which can reduce revenue generation and increase operational costs [42].
• Legal Liability: Medical errors resulting from clinician burnout can increase the risk of legal liability for healthcare organizations. Medical malpractice lawsuits can be costly and damage the organization’s reputation [43].

5. Emerging Mitigation Strategies: A Focus on Technological Solutions

Addressing clinician burnout requires a multifaceted approach that incorporates both traditional interventions and innovative technological solutions.

5.1 Traditional Interventions

Traditional interventions aimed at mitigating burnout include:

• Stress Management Programs: Stress management programs teach clinicians coping skills, such as mindfulness, relaxation techniques, and cognitive behavioral therapy, to help them manage stress and improve their resilience. While these programs can be beneficial, their effectiveness is often limited by the organizational factors contributing to burnout [44].
• Workload Reduction Strategies: Workload reduction strategies aim to reduce the volume of work that clinicians are required to handle. These strategies may include hiring additional staff, streamlining workflows, and delegating tasks to other healthcare professionals. However, implementing workload reduction strategies can be challenging due to budget constraints and staffing shortages [45].
• Improving Communication and Collaboration: Improving communication and collaboration among clinicians, administrators, and other healthcare professionals can foster a more supportive and cohesive work environment. Strategies for improving communication include implementing team-based care models, promoting open communication channels, and providing training in conflict resolution [46].
• Promoting Work-Life Balance: Encouraging clinicians to prioritize work-life balance can help them to reduce stress and prevent burnout. Strategies for promoting work-life balance include offering flexible work schedules, providing childcare support, and encouraging clinicians to take vacation time [47].

5.2 Technological Solutions: The Potential of AI-Powered Tools

Emerging technological solutions, particularly those leveraging artificial intelligence, offer promising avenues for alleviating administrative burden and improving clinician well-being.

• AI Scribes: AI scribes can automatically generate clinical documentation from conversations between clinicians and patients. By automating the documentation process, AI scribes can significantly reduce administrative burden and free up clinicians to focus on patient care. Studies have shown that AI scribes can reduce the amount of time that clinicians spend on documentation by as much as 50% [48].
• Clinical Decision Support Systems: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can provide clinicians with real-time guidance on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. CDSS can help to reduce cognitive overload, improve decision-making, and prevent medical errors [49].
• Automated Scheduling and Workflow Management: Automated scheduling and workflow management systems can streamline administrative tasks, such as scheduling appointments, managing referrals, and tracking lab results. These systems can help to reduce administrative burden and improve efficiency [50].
• Telehealth: Telehealth can provide patients with remote access to care, reducing the need for in-person visits. Telehealth can improve access to care for patients in rural or underserved areas and can also reduce the workload for clinicians [51].

5.3 Ethical Considerations and the Importance of Human Oversight

The implementation of AI in healthcare raises important ethical considerations. It is crucial to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that is ethical, transparent, and accountable. Key ethical considerations include:

• Data Privacy and Security: AI systems rely on large amounts of data, including patient data. It is essential to protect patient data from unauthorized access and use. Healthcare organizations must implement robust data security measures and comply with privacy regulations, such as HIPAA [52].
• Bias and Fairness: AI systems can perpetuate and amplify existing biases in healthcare. It is important to ensure that AI systems are trained on diverse and representative data sets to avoid bias. Healthcare organizations must also monitor AI systems for bias and take steps to mitigate any identified biases [53].
• Transparency and Explainability: It is important for clinicians and patients to understand how AI systems work and how they arrive at their conclusions. AI systems should be transparent and explainable so that users can understand their reasoning and identify potential errors [54].
• Human Oversight and Accountability: AI systems should not replace human clinicians. Rather, they should augment and support clinicians’ decision-making. Clinicians must retain ultimate responsibility for patient care and should have the ability to override AI recommendations when necessary [55].

6. Conclusion

Clinician burnout is a pervasive and escalating crisis within healthcare systems globally. The consequences of burnout are far-reaching, impacting clinician well-being, patient care, and healthcare organizations. Addressing clinician burnout requires a multifaceted approach that considers the complex interplay of organizational, occupational, and individual factors. While traditional interventions, such as stress management programs and workload reduction strategies, can be beneficial, they are often insufficient to address the root causes of burnout. Emerging technological solutions, particularly those leveraging artificial intelligence, offer promising avenues for alleviating administrative burden and improving clinician well-being. However, the implementation of AI in healthcare must be approached with caution, considering ethical implications and the importance of maintaining human oversight and empathy. A holistic approach to addressing clinician burnout should prioritize both technological advancements and a fundamental shift in healthcare culture to promote clinician autonomy, well-being, and resilience. Future research should focus on evaluating the long-term effectiveness of AI-based interventions, exploring the impact of organizational culture on burnout rates, and developing strategies to promote resilience among clinicians.

References

[1] Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159-165.

[2] Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (3rd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.

[3] Tawfik, D. S., Profit, J., Morgenthaler, T. I., Satele, D. V., Sinsky, C. A., Dyrbye, L. N., … & Sexton, J. B. (2019). Physician burnout, well-being, and safety outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(8), 548-559.

[4] Linzer, M., Varkey, A., Ratanawongsa, N., Bobula, J., Nasca, T., Sinsky, C., … & Gerrity, M. (2015). Improving physician satisfaction: a systematic review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 90(10), 1391-1411.

[5] Dyrbye, L. N., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Cipriano, P. F., Bhatt, J., Ommaya, A. K., … & Waldman, D. A. (2017). Burnout among health professional students: a call to action. Academic Medicine, 92(4), 444-451.

[6] Rotenstein, L. S., Torre, M., Ramos, M. A., Rosales, R. C., Pelletier, S. R., Sen, S., & Mata, D. A. (2018). Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 321(22), 2214-2236.

[7] Hanrahan, R., Aiken, L. H., McClaine, L., & Hanlon, A. L. (2010). Relationship between nurse staffing and hospital costs. Nursing Economics, 28(1), 14-22.

[8] Pappa, S., Bridgland, V. M. E., Carrahar, H., FitzSimons, G., Herbert, J., Galanopoulos, S., … & Soldani, K. (2020). Global prevalence of depression, anxiety and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain, behavior, and immunity, 88, 901-907.

[9] West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Erwin, P. J., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2016). Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 388(10057), 2272-2281.

[10] Shanafelt, T. D., Boone, S., Tan, L., Dyrbye, L. N., Sotile, W., Satele, D., … & Oreskovich, M. R. (2012). Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(18), 1377-1385.

[11] Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J., & Silber, J. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA, 288(16), 1987-1993.

[12] Dyrbye, L. N., West, C. P., Satele, D., Boone, S., Tan, L., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2014). Burnout among US physicians by specialty. Journal of Internal Medicine, 275(4), 401-414.

[13] Rupert, P. A., & Morgan, D. J. (2005). Work setting and burnout among professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(5), 544.

[14] Wurmser, H., Dubois, D., Euillet, J., Rad, M., Benzerroug, S., & Perrin-Houdon, L. (2022). A Systematic Review of Burnout Prevalence Among Physicians in Europe. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1-12.

[15] Pathman, D. E., Konrad, T. R., & Williams, E. S. (2002). Physician job satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and stress in rural North Carolina. The Journal of Rural Health, 18(2), 212-221.

[16] Hamel, L., Lopes, L., Kearney, A., Kirzinger, A., & Muñana, C. (2021). KFF/The Washington Post Frontline Health Care Workers Survey. Kaiser Family Foundation.

[17] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.

[18] Verghese, A. (2008). The electronic medical record in a new era: revolution or burnout?. The American Journal of Medicine, 121(12), 1013-1015.

[19] Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.

[20] Sutcliffe, K. M., Lewton, E., & Rosenthal, M. M. (2004). Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Academic Medicine, 79(2), 186-194.

[21] Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2005). A model of employee burnout: The effects of job and individual characteristics. In J. Dunham (Ed.), Stress in the workplace: Past, present and future (pp. 53-75). Whurr Publishers.

[22] Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: staff questionnaire survey. BMJ, 318(7178), 228-232.

[23] Figley, C. R. (1995). Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress in those who treat the traumatized. Brunner/Mazel.

[24] Epstein, E. G., & Hamric, A. B. (2009). Moral distress, moral residue, and the silently eroding integrity of health care professionals. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(11), 4-15.

[25] Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163.

[26] World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global strategy on health, environment and climate change: the transformation needed to improve lives and well-being sustainably through healthy environments. World Health Organization.

[27] Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 15(1), 27-33.

[28] Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.

[29] Rosch, P. J. (2001). The quest for stress-free living. Lincolnwood, IL: VGM Career Horizons.

[30] Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76-82.

[31] Bianchi, R., Veronese, G., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2015). Is burnout detectable by means of its specific symptom patterns? A systematic review of the literature. Work & Stress, 29(3), 266-284.

[32] Jackson, C. A., Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., Satele, D. V., Dyrbye, L. N. (2016). Burnout and alcohol abuse/dependence among U.S. physicians: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(9), 1042-1051.

[33] Armon, G., Shirom, A., & Shapira, I. (2012). On the nature of burnout insomnia: A prospective study of employed adults. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 309-322.

[34] Kivimäki, M., & Kawachi, I. (2015). Job stress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 72(2), 158-164.

[35] Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Massie, F. S., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Power, D., … & Shanafelt, T. D. (2008). Burnout and suicidal ideation among US medical students. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(5), 334-341.

[36] Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Rathert, C. (2008). Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: Exploring the mediation effect of job attitudes. Health Care Management Review, 33(1), 29-39.

[37] Shanafelt, T. D., Balch, C. M., Bechamps, G., Freischlag, J., Lyckholm, L., Masnari, O., … & Sloan, J. (2005). Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. Annals of Surgery, 242(5), 614.

[38] McAlearney, A. S., Sieck, C. J., & Dixon, B. E. (2015). Attributes of value in health information technology: perceptions from key informants. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1), 67-76.

[39] Firth-Cozens, J. (2001). Organisational and individual interventions to reduce stress in health care staff: what has been tried?. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 6(1), 52-56.

[40] Hayes, L. J., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Duffield, C., Shamian, J., Buchan, J., Hughes, F., … & Scott, A. (2006). Nurse turnover: a literature review—an update. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(2), 237-263.

[41] Hemp, P. (2009). Presenteeism: at work—but out of it. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 49-58.

[42] Goetz, R., Schutte, J., & Herten, M. (2018). Productivity losses due to burnout: a review of German studies. European Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), 293-303.

[43] Kachalia, A., Mello, M. M., Brennan, T. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2003). Physician characteristics associated with adverse events and preventable adverse events. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(17), 2041-2046.

[44] Regehr, C., Glancy, D., & Pitts, A. (2014). Interventions to reduce stress in university students: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 148(1), 1-11.

[45] Öqvist, E., Handelshögskolan, E., & Göteborgs universitet. (2013). Workload Management: A Literature Review. Centre for Healthcare Improvement.

[46] Weaver, S. J., Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Lapses, J. L., Mays, J., Bradley, E. H., … & Pronovost, P. J. (2010). Does teamwork improve performance in the operating room? A multilevel analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 211(2), 133-142.

[47] Valcour, M. (2007). Work–based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and outcomes: Boundary management style as a critical resource. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1512-1524.

[48] Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Kim, J. N., Wiens, J., & Dean, J. (2018). Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(12), 866-872.

[49] Berner, E. S., & La Lande, T. J. (2007). Overview of clinical decision support systems. In E. H. Shortliffe & J. J. Cimino (Eds.), Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine (pp. 499-516). Springer.

[50] Kaplan, G. A., & Hertzmann, P. A. (2013). Increasing productivity using automated scheduling software: A study of the effectiveness of an automated scheduling package. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 29(2), 91-94.

[51] Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Smith, B. R., Alverson, D. C., & Brown, C. R. (2016). The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions. Telemedicine and e-Health, 22(5), 342-375.

[52] Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Public Law 104-191.

[53] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453.

[54] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

[55] Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629-650.