In a recent conversation with Dr. Emily Harper, a renowned authority on medical ethics and technology, we delved into the compelling story of former jockey Michael Straight. This narrative, which has captivated many, revolves around Michael’s remarkable rehabilitation journey using the ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton—a sophisticated medical device valued at $100,000. Five years after a tragic accident left him paralysed from the waist down, Michael achieved the incredible feat of walking once more. However, his journey was fraught with challenges, and Dr. Harper provided insightful commentary on the broader implications of this inspiring tale.
Dr. Harper opened the discussion by highlighting the dual nature of Michael’s experience. “Michael’s journey is a testament to human resilience and the breakthroughs in medical technology,” she remarked, her enthusiasm for the topic palpable. “However, it also underscores the complexities and ethical considerations that come with such advancements.” The ReWalk Personal Exoskeleton, an innovative device designed to aid limb movement, offered Michael a path back to a semblance of normalcy. Over time, he achieved an astonishing 371,091 steps, each one representing a triumph of technology and human determination. Yet, this summer, a minor technical glitch—a loose wire—rendered the device inoperative. When Michael sought assistance, he was met with the disheartening news that the company did not service machines older than five years.
Dr. Harper commented on this unfortunate reality, “The lifespan of these technologies versus their cost is a critical issue. For someone like Michael, who has already overcome so much, to be told that his lifeline is essentially obsolete, is not just a technical problem but a profoundly human one.” The public outcry and media attention eventually prompted the company to reverse its decision and repair Michael’s exoskeleton, though they refrained from promising future repairs. This incident raises a broader ethical debate: where does a technology company’s responsibility end, and how should they balance profit with empathy?
Dr. Harper continued, “This situation is a microcosm of a larger ethical dilemma in our technologically advanced society. The power dynamics between corporations and individuals can lead to situations where the human element is overshadowed by financial considerations.” This reflects the cautionary sentiments expressed by C.S. Lewis in “The Abolition of Man,” where he warned of the potential for power—technological or otherwise—to corrupt. The decision by the company not to commit to ongoing support epitomises a worrying trend where some entities may prioritise profit over people.
Dr. Harper elaborated, “It’s a dystopian scenario we must actively strive to prevent. The idea that a manufacturer’s responsibility ends once a product is sold sets a dangerous precedent.” The conversation naturally transitioned into the philosophical and ethical foundations of medical care. Historically, recognising individuals as bearers of inherent dignity has shaped the moral framework within which medical advancements are pursued. Dr. Harper argued that detaching medical technology from these ethical moorings could have dire consequences. “Medical technology, like any form of care, should be governed by principles that recognise the intrinsic dignity of every person,” she stated firmly. “This is not just a Christian ideal but a universal ethical standard that should guide our interactions and innovations.”
As our discussion drew to a close, Dr. Harper expressed optimism about the potential for change. She championed a new paradigm where medical technology firms adopt a form of Hippocratic Oath—starting with “First, do no harm.” “Imagine a world where the creators of such life-changing devices as the ReWalk Exoskeleton are bound by an ethical commitment to their users,” Dr. Harper envisioned. “It would transform the landscape of medical technology and ensure that people like Michael aren’t left helpless when their devices fail.”
Michael Straight’s story, while illustrating the remarkable progress in medical technology, also serves as a powerful reminder of the ethical responsibilities that accompany such power. As society continues to innovate, it is crucial to remember that at the heart of every technological miracle is a human being, deserving of dignity and care. The narrative calls for a balanced approach that prioritises human welfare alongside technological advancement, urging stakeholders to consider the profound impact their decisions have on the lives they touch.
Be the first to comment