Advanced Exoskeleton Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Design, Control, Applications, and Future Directions

Abstract

Exoskeletons, wearable robotic devices designed to augment human capabilities, have evolved significantly from early prototypes to sophisticated systems with diverse applications. This research report presents a comprehensive review of advanced exoskeleton technology, exploring its historical development, fundamental principles, key components, control strategies, and diverse applications across various domains. We delve into the design considerations, including mechanical structure, actuators, sensors, and power sources, highlighting the challenges and advancements in achieving lightweight, efficient, and adaptable systems. Furthermore, we analyze different control methodologies, such as impedance control, admittance control, and neural control, discussing their advantages and limitations in enabling seamless human-exoskeleton interaction. The report examines the applications of exoskeletons in healthcare (rehabilitation, mobility assistance), industry (ergonomic support, heavy lifting), military (load carriage, enhanced endurance), and personal assistance, showcasing the potential benefits and limitations of these technologies in each domain. We also address ethical considerations, safety concerns, and regulatory challenges associated with exoskeleton deployment. Finally, we explore future trends and emerging technologies, including soft exoskeletons, advanced materials, artificial intelligence-driven control, and brain-computer interfaces, which hold promise for revolutionizing exoskeleton design and expanding their capabilities. This comprehensive review aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners interested in the development and application of advanced exoskeleton technology.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Exoskeletons represent a convergence of robotics, biomechanics, and materials science, offering the potential to enhance human strength, endurance, and mobility. The concept of wearable assistive devices dates back to the late 19th century, with early attempts focusing on pneumatic and hydraulic actuation. However, the advent of advanced materials, microelectronics, and control systems in the late 20th and early 21st centuries has propelled significant advancements in exoskeleton technology. These advancements have enabled the development of more sophisticated and practical exoskeletons for a wide range of applications, from rehabilitation and mobility assistance to industrial and military tasks.

The increasing prevalence of age-related mobility impairments, spinal cord injuries, and other neurological disorders has fueled the demand for exoskeletons as assistive devices. In industrial settings, exoskeletons offer a solution to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders caused by repetitive motions, heavy lifting, and awkward postures. Military applications leverage exoskeletons to enhance soldiers’ load-carrying capacity, endurance, and overall performance. Furthermore, the potential of exoskeletons to augment human capabilities in personal mobility and recreational activities is also gaining traction. However, the successful deployment of exoskeletons requires overcoming several challenges, including weight, power consumption, control complexity, and user acceptance. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of exoskeleton technology, highlighting its advancements, challenges, and future directions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Historical Development

The earliest conceptualizations of exoskeletons emerged in the late 19th century. In 1890, Russian inventor Nicholas Yagin created a device using compressed gas bags to assist in walking and jumping [1]. This early prototype, while rudimentary, laid the foundation for future exoskeleton development.

In the 1960s, General Electric (GE) developed the Hardiman, a hydraulically powered exoskeleton designed to augment human strength. While the Hardiman demonstrated the potential of exoskeletons, it was plagued by control instability and excessive weight, rendering it impractical for real-world applications [2].

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed the emergence of more refined exoskeletons, focusing on specific applications such as rehabilitation and gait assistance. The Lokomat, developed in the early 2000s, became a widely used robotic gait trainer for patients with spinal cord injuries and stroke [3].

The 21st century has seen a surge in exoskeleton research and development, driven by advancements in materials science, sensor technology, and control algorithms. Numerous companies and research institutions have introduced exoskeletons for various applications, including rehabilitation (e.g., ReWalk, Ekso Bionics), industrial support (e.g., SuitX, Ottobock), and military augmentation (e.g., Lockheed Martin’s ONYX). The development of soft exoskeletons, which utilize flexible materials and pneumatic actuation, has also gained momentum, offering a lighter and more comfortable alternative to rigid exoskeletons [4].

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Types of Exoskeletons

Exoskeletons can be classified based on various criteria, including their intended application, power source, and mechanical structure.

3.1. Classification by Application

• Rehabilitation Exoskeletons: These devices are designed to assist patients with neurological disorders, spinal cord injuries, or stroke in regaining motor function. They typically provide repetitive, assisted movements to promote neuroplasticity and improve gait patterns. Examples include the Lokomat, ReWalk, and Ekso Bionics exoskeletons.
• Assistive Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons aim to compensate for mobility impairments caused by age-related decline, muscle weakness, or other conditions. They provide support and assistance during walking, standing, and other activities of daily living. Examples include the Indego and Honda Walking Assist Device.
• Industrial Exoskeletons: Industrial exoskeletons are used to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. They provide support for the back, shoulders, and legs during repetitive tasks, heavy lifting, and awkward postures. Examples include the SuitX MAX and Ottobock Paexo exoskeletons.
• Military Exoskeletons: Military exoskeletons are designed to enhance soldiers’ load-carrying capacity, endurance, and overall performance. They provide additional strength and support for carrying heavy equipment and navigating challenging terrain. Examples include Lockheed Martin’s ONYX and the HULC (Human Universal Load Carrier) exoskeleton.
• Personal Exoskeletons: These are designed for everyday use by the public to enhance movement, reduce fatigue and improve lifestyle.

3.2. Classification by Power Source

• Powered Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons utilize electric motors, hydraulics, or pneumatics to provide active assistance to the user’s movements. They typically require a power source, such as a battery or external compressor.
• Passive Exoskeletons: Passive exoskeletons do not use external power sources. Instead, they rely on mechanical springs, dampers, and linkages to store and release energy, providing support and reducing strain on the user’s muscles and joints. These are generally lighter but provide less assistance than powered versions.

3.3. Classification by Mechanical Structure

• Rigid Exoskeletons: Rigid exoskeletons are constructed from rigid materials, such as metal or composites, and provide a robust and precise mechanical structure. They are typically used for high-load applications and require sophisticated control systems to ensure safe and comfortable human-exoskeleton interaction.
• Soft Exoskeletons: Soft exoskeletons utilize flexible materials, such as textiles and elastomers, and pneumatic or cable-driven actuation to provide support and assistance. They are generally lighter and more comfortable than rigid exoskeletons but may offer less precise control and force output.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Technologies and Components

Exoskeletons comprise various technologies and components that work together to provide support, assistance, and control. These include mechanical structure, actuators, sensors, control systems, and power sources.

4.1. Mechanical Structure

The mechanical structure of an exoskeleton provides the framework for transmitting forces and torques to the user’s body. The design of the mechanical structure must consider factors such as range of motion, degrees of freedom, and anatomical alignment. The structure is often made from materials with a high strength to weight ratio such as aluminium alloy, titanium or carbon fibre composites.

4.2. Actuators

Actuators provide the force and motion required to assist the user’s movements. Common types of actuators used in exoskeletons include:

• Electric Motors: Electric motors are widely used in exoskeletons due to their compact size, high efficiency, and precise control capabilities. They can be coupled with gears or other transmission mechanisms to provide the desired torque and speed.
• Hydraulic Actuators: Hydraulic actuators offer high power density and are suitable for applications requiring large forces. However, they can be bulky and require a hydraulic power unit and fluid lines.
• Pneumatic Actuators: Pneumatic actuators are lightweight and offer a good power-to-weight ratio. They are often used in soft exoskeletons due to their compliance and flexibility.
• Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs): SMAs are materials that change shape in response to temperature changes. They can be used as actuators in exoskeletons, offering a compact and lightweight solution. However, SMAs typically have slow response times and limited force output.

4.3. Sensors

Sensors are essential for measuring the user’s movements, forces, and intentions. Common types of sensors used in exoskeletons include:

• Joint Angle Sensors: Joint angle sensors measure the angles of the exoskeleton’s joints, providing information about the user’s posture and movement. These can be potentiometers, encoders, or inertial measurement units (IMUs).
• Force Sensors: Force sensors measure the forces exerted by the user on the exoskeleton or by the exoskeleton on the environment. These can be load cells, force plates, or pressure sensors.
• Electromyography (EMG) Sensors: EMG sensors measure the electrical activity of muscles, providing information about the user’s muscle activation patterns and intentions. These can be used to predict the user’s desired movements and trigger the exoskeleton’s actuators.
• Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs): IMUs measure the angular velocity and acceleration of the exoskeleton, providing information about its orientation and movement. These are typically used for balance control and gait analysis.

4.4. Control Systems

The control system regulates the exoskeleton’s movements and ensures safe and comfortable human-exoskeleton interaction. Common control strategies include:

• Impedance Control: Impedance control regulates the relationship between the exoskeleton’s position and the forces it exerts on the user. This approach allows the user to feel a sense of control and actively participate in the movement. This is achieved by controlling the actuators to emulate a spring-damper system.
• Admittance Control: Admittance control regulates the relationship between the forces exerted by the user on the exoskeleton and the exoskeleton’s resulting motion. This approach allows the exoskeleton to adapt to the user’s movements and provide assistance as needed. This is achieved by controlling the actuators to move in accordance with the applied force.
• Trajectory Tracking Control: Trajectory tracking control forces the exoskeleton to follow a predefined trajectory, regardless of the user’s movements. This approach is often used in rehabilitation applications to provide repetitive, assisted movements.
• Neural Control: Neural control utilizes brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) or other neural sensing technologies to directly control the exoskeleton’s movements based on the user’s brain activity. This approach holds promise for providing intuitive and seamless control for individuals with severe motor impairments [5].

4.5. Power Sources

Power sources provide the energy required to operate the exoskeleton’s actuators and control system. Common types of power sources include:

• Batteries: Batteries are the most common power source for exoskeletons, offering a portable and convenient solution. Lithium-ion batteries are widely used due to their high energy density and long lifespan.
• External Power Supplies: External power supplies provide a continuous source of power for exoskeletons, eliminating the need for batteries. However, they require a tethered connection, limiting the user’s mobility.
• Fuel Cells: Fuel cells convert chemical energy into electrical energy, offering a clean and efficient power source. However, fuel cells can be bulky and require a supply of fuel, such as hydrogen.
• Supercapacitors: Supercapacitors store electrical energy and can provide rapid bursts of power. They are often used in conjunction with batteries to provide peak power for demanding tasks.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Applications

Exoskeletons have found applications in a wide range of fields, including healthcare, industry, military, and personal assistance.

5.1. Healthcare

• Rehabilitation: Exoskeletons are used to assist patients with neurological disorders, spinal cord injuries, or stroke in regaining motor function. They provide repetitive, assisted movements to promote neuroplasticity and improve gait patterns. Studies have shown that exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation can improve walking speed, balance, and functional independence [6].
• Mobility Assistance: Exoskeletons can provide support and assistance for individuals with mobility impairments caused by age-related decline, muscle weakness, or other conditions. They can improve walking speed, reduce fatigue, and enhance overall mobility. Research indicates that assistive exoskeletons can improve the quality of life for individuals with mobility impairments by enabling them to participate in activities that were previously inaccessible [7].

5.2. Industry

• Ergonomic Support: Exoskeletons are used to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. They provide support for the back, shoulders, and legs during repetitive tasks, heavy lifting, and awkward postures. Studies have demonstrated that industrial exoskeletons can reduce muscle strain, improve posture, and decrease the risk of injuries [8].
• Heavy Lifting: Exoskeletons can augment human strength and endurance, enabling workers to lift and carry heavy objects with less effort. This can improve productivity, reduce fatigue, and prevent injuries.

5.3. Military

• Load Carriage: Exoskeletons are used to enhance soldiers’ load-carrying capacity, endurance, and overall performance. They provide additional strength and support for carrying heavy equipment and navigating challenging terrain. Research has shown that military exoskeletons can reduce the metabolic cost of carrying heavy loads and improve soldiers’ endurance [9].
• Enhanced Endurance: Exoskeletons can reduce fatigue and improve soldiers’ endurance during long missions. They provide assistance during walking, running, and other activities, allowing soldiers to maintain their performance for extended periods.

5.4. Personal Assistance

• Enhanced Mobility: Exoskeletons can provide support and assistance for individuals with mobility impairments, enabling them to walk, stand, and climb stairs with greater ease. This can improve their independence, quality of life, and participation in social activities.
• Recreational Activities: Exoskeletons can be used to enhance performance and enjoyment in recreational activities such as hiking, skiing, and cycling. They can provide additional power and support, allowing users to push their limits and explore new terrain.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Benefits and Limitations

Exoskeletons offer numerous benefits, but also face several limitations that need to be addressed for widespread adoption.

6.1. Benefits

• Increased Strength and Endurance: Exoskeletons can augment human strength and endurance, enabling users to perform tasks that would otherwise be impossible or physically demanding.
• Reduced Risk of Injury: Exoskeletons can reduce the risk of musculoskeletal disorders by providing support and reducing strain on the user’s muscles and joints.
• Improved Mobility: Exoskeletons can improve mobility for individuals with mobility impairments, enabling them to walk, stand, and climb stairs with greater ease.
• Enhanced Rehabilitation: Exoskeletons can assist patients in regaining motor function after neurological disorders, spinal cord injuries, or stroke.
• Increased Productivity: Exoskeletons can improve productivity in industrial settings by reducing fatigue and enabling workers to perform tasks more efficiently.

6.2. Limitations

• Weight and Bulk: Exoskeletons can be heavy and bulky, which can limit their maneuverability and comfort. Further research and development are needed to create lighter and more compact designs.
• Power Consumption: Powered exoskeletons require a significant amount of power, which can limit their operating time. Efficient power sources and energy management strategies are needed to extend battery life.
• Control Complexity: Controlling exoskeletons can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex movements and varying user intentions. Sophisticated control algorithms and human-machine interfaces are needed to ensure safe and intuitive operation.
• Cost: Exoskeletons can be expensive, which limits their accessibility to many potential users. Cost-effective designs and manufacturing processes are needed to make exoskeletons more affordable.
• User Acceptance: User acceptance can be a barrier to exoskeleton adoption. Factors such as comfort, aesthetics, and social stigma can influence user perceptions of exoskeletons. Addressing these concerns through user-centered design and education is essential.
• Lack of Adaptability: Current generation exoskeletons are often designed for specific body types and may not be easily adaptable to different users. Flexible, adjustable and even customisable designs will be required.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Ethical Considerations

The deployment of exoskeletons raises several ethical considerations that need to be addressed.

• Safety: Ensuring the safety of users is paramount. Exoskeletons must be designed and tested to minimize the risk of falls, injuries, and other hazards. Rigorous safety standards and regulatory frameworks are needed to govern the development and use of exoskeletons.
• Privacy: Exoskeletons can collect data about the user’s movements, activities, and health. Protecting user privacy and ensuring data security are essential. Transparent data collection policies and user consent mechanisms are needed.
• Job Displacement: The use of exoskeletons in industrial settings may lead to job displacement as workers become more productive and fewer employees are needed. Addressing the potential impact on employment through retraining programs and social safety nets is important.
• Social Equity: Ensuring equitable access to exoskeleton technology is important. Exoskeletons should be available to all individuals who can benefit from them, regardless of their socioeconomic status. Subsidies and other financial assistance programs may be needed to make exoskeletons more affordable.
• Human Augmentation: The use of exoskeletons to enhance human capabilities raises questions about the limits of human augmentation. Ethical guidelines are needed to govern the development and use of exoskeletons for performance enhancement.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Future Trends

Exoskeleton technology is rapidly evolving, with several emerging trends shaping its future.

• Soft Exoskeletons: Soft exoskeletons, which utilize flexible materials and pneumatic actuation, are gaining traction due to their lighter weight, greater comfort, and adaptability. These are particularly useful for applications requiring natural and unrestricted movement [10].
• Advanced Materials: The development of advanced materials, such as lightweight composites and shape memory alloys, is enabling the creation of lighter, stronger, and more efficient exoskeletons.
• Artificial Intelligence-Driven Control: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are being used to develop more sophisticated control algorithms that can adapt to the user’s movements and intentions in real-time. AI-powered exoskeletons can learn from user data to optimize performance and provide personalized assistance [11].
• Brain-Computer Interfaces: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being explored as a means of directly controlling exoskeletons using the user’s brain activity. This technology holds promise for providing intuitive and seamless control for individuals with severe motor impairments.
• Haptic Feedback: Integrating haptic feedback into exoskeletons can enhance the user’s sense of embodiment and control. Haptic feedback can provide information about the forces exerted by the exoskeleton, the texture of objects, and the environment, improving the user’s interaction with the world.
• Modular Designs: The development of modular exoskeletons, which can be customized to meet the specific needs of individual users, is gaining momentum. Modular designs allow users to select the components and features that are most relevant to their activities and goals.
• Miniaturization: As electronic components and actuators become smaller and more powerful, it will be possible to create smaller, lighter, and more discreet exoskeletons. This trend will broaden the range of applications for exoskeletons and make them more appealing to a wider audience.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

9. Conclusion

Exoskeleton technology has made significant strides in recent years, offering the potential to enhance human capabilities in a wide range of applications. From rehabilitation and mobility assistance to industrial support and military augmentation, exoskeletons are transforming the way we work, move, and interact with the world. While challenges remain in terms of weight, power consumption, control complexity, and cost, ongoing research and development efforts are paving the way for more advanced, efficient, and user-friendly exoskeletons. The future of exoskeleton technology is bright, with emerging trends such as soft exoskeletons, AI-driven control, and brain-computer interfaces promising to revolutionize the field and unlock new possibilities for human augmentation and assistance.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] Rosen, M. J. (2008). A brief history of exoskeletons. In The human exoskeletons: Robotics and biomechanics (pp. 1-15). Springer.

[2] Johnsen, E. G., & Corliss, R. O. (1968). Teleoperators and human augmentation. NASA SP-5047.

[3] Riener, R., Lünenburger, L., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V. (2006). Human-centered robotics applied to gait training and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Robotics, 2006. ICORR 2006. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 16-21). IEEE.

[4] Walsh, C. J. (2018). Exosuits and soft exoskeletons for human locomotion support. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1-16.

[5] Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006). Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(9), 536-546.

[6] Swank, C., & Zebracki, K. (2020). The effectiveness of exoskeleton-assisted therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 26(3), 173-187.

[7] Esquenazi, A., Talaty, M., Packel, A., & Saulino, A. (2012). Ambulatory exoskeletons for persons with spinal cord injury: a review of design and performance. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 49(7), 1063-1074.

[8] de Looze, M. P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Exler, J., & Weidner, R. (2016). Working with exoskeletons: What do we need to know?. Ergonomics, 59(5), 681-689.

[9] Rome, K., Kahn, J. H., Granata, K. P., & McGorry, R. W. (2006). Biodesign of a quasi-passive parallel exoskeleton for load carrying. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 128(3), 425-431.

[10] Awad, L. N., Bae, J., O’Donnell, K., Esquenazi, A., Francisco, G. E., Nolan, K. J., … & Walsh, C. J. (2017). A soft robotic exosuit improves self-selected walking speed and reduces metabolic cost in stroke survivors. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14(1), 1-15.

[11] Hussain, S., Wang, Z., & Chen, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based control for exoskeletons: a review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 832444.