Aortopathy: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Genetics, Diagnosis, and Emerging Therapies

Abstract

Aortopathy, encompassing a spectrum of disorders affecting the aorta, presents a significant clinical challenge due to its potential for life-threatening complications such as aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture. This review provides a comprehensive overview of aortopathy, delving into its intricate pathogenesis, diverse genetic underpinnings, advanced diagnostic modalities, current management strategies, and promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions. We explore the biomechanical factors contributing to aortic wall degeneration, the complex interplay of genetic mutations in various signaling pathways, and the evolving role of imaging techniques and genetic testing in early diagnosis and risk stratification. Furthermore, we discuss the current medical and surgical approaches to managing aortopathy, alongside the importance of lifestyle modifications and genetic counseling. Finally, we highlight the emerging research on disease mechanisms, including the involvement of inflammation, matrix remodeling, and epigenetic modifications, and discuss potential therapeutic targets aimed at preventing disease progression and improving patient outcomes.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The aorta, the body’s largest artery, plays a crucial role in systemic circulation by distributing oxygenated blood from the heart to the rest of the body. Aortopathy refers to a group of diseases characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the aortic wall, leading to its weakening and dilation. These abnormalities can manifest as aneurysms (localized or diffuse widening of the aorta), dissections (tears in the aortic wall), and rupture, all of which carry substantial morbidity and mortality. The etiology of aortopathy is complex and heterogeneous, involving a combination of genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and underlying medical conditions. While some cases are clearly inherited and associated with specific gene mutations, others are sporadic, arising from a complex interplay of risk factors such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and inflammation. The clinical presentation of aortopathy can range from asymptomatic aneurysms discovered incidentally on imaging to acute, life-threatening dissections requiring immediate surgical intervention. Due to its often silent progression, early diagnosis and risk stratification are critical for preventing catastrophic events. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of aortopathy, encompassing its pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, management, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Pathogenesis of Aortopathy

The pathogenesis of aortopathy is a multifactorial process involving a complex interplay of biomechanical forces, cellular dysfunction, and molecular alterations within the aortic wall. The aortic wall comprises three distinct layers: the intima, media, and adventitia. The media, composed of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and extracellular matrix (ECM), is responsible for the aorta’s structural integrity and elastic properties. Disruption of the normal architecture and composition of the aortic wall leads to its weakening and dilation, predisposing it to aneurysm formation and dissection.

2.1. Biomechanical Factors

The aorta is subjected to continuous mechanical stress from pulsatile blood flow and pressure. These forces, particularly shear stress and circumferential stress, play a crucial role in regulating aortic wall homeostasis. Under normal conditions, SMCs respond to these forces by maintaining ECM turnover and regulating vascular tone. However, in the setting of aortopathy, abnormal biomechanical forces, such as those seen in hypertension, can contribute to aortic wall remodeling and weakening. Increased wall stress promotes SMC apoptosis, ECM degradation, and inflammation, ultimately leading to aortic dilation and aneurysm formation. Conversely, regions of low or disturbed shear stress can promote endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerotic plaque formation, which can also contribute to aortic wall degeneration.

2.2. Cellular Dysfunction

Smooth muscle cell dysfunction is a central feature of aortopathy. In healthy arteries, SMCs maintain the structural integrity of the media by synthesizing ECM components, including collagen, elastin, and proteoglycans. However, in aortopathy, SMCs undergo phenotypic modulation, losing their contractile function and adopting a synthetic phenotype characterized by increased matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) production and decreased synthesis of ECM proteins. This shift in SMC phenotype contributes to ECM degradation and aortic wall weakening. Furthermore, SMC apoptosis is increased in aortopathic aortas, further reducing the number of functional SMCs and contributing to aortic wall thinning. Endothelial dysfunction also plays a role in aortopathy. The endothelium, the inner lining of the aorta, regulates vascular tone, inflammation, and thrombosis. Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by decreased nitric oxide (NO) production and increased expression of adhesion molecules, promotes SMC dysfunction, inflammation, and ECM degradation.

2.3. Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

The ECM provides the structural scaffold for the aortic wall and is essential for its biomechanical properties. In aortopathy, the ECM undergoes extensive remodeling, characterized by degradation of elastin and collagen fibers, increased deposition of disorganized collagen, and accumulation of proteoglycans. Elastin, a highly elastic protein, is crucial for the aorta’s ability to stretch and recoil during each heartbeat. Degradation of elastin fibers, mediated by MMPs and other proteases, reduces the aorta’s elasticity and compliance, increasing its susceptibility to aneurysm formation and dissection. Collagen, the most abundant protein in the ECM, provides tensile strength to the aortic wall. However, in aortopathy, collagen fibers become disorganized and cross-linked, reducing their ability to withstand mechanical stress. The balance between ECM synthesis and degradation is tightly regulated by a complex interplay of factors, including growth factors, cytokines, and MMPs. Dysregulation of this balance in aortopathy leads to ECM remodeling and aortic wall weakening.

2.4. Inflammation

Inflammation plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of aortopathy. Inflammatory cells, such as macrophages and lymphocytes, infiltrate the aortic wall and release pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). These cytokines promote SMC dysfunction, ECM degradation, and endothelial dysfunction, contributing to aortic wall weakening. Furthermore, inflammatory cells produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage DNA, proteins, and lipids, further exacerbating aortic wall degeneration. Specific inflammatory pathways, such as the NF-κB pathway, are activated in aortopathic aortas, contributing to the inflammatory cascade. Studies have shown that inhibiting inflammatory pathways can reduce aortic aneurysm growth in animal models, suggesting that inflammation is a potential therapeutic target for aortopathy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Genetic Basis of Aortopathy

Aortopathy can be caused by both acquired and inherited factors. Numerous genetic mutations have been identified that contribute to the development of aortopathy, often in the setting of heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD). These genetic defects affect a variety of pathways crucial for aortic wall integrity. HTAD is characterized by a high degree of genetic heterogeneity, with mutations in multiple genes implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease.

3.1. Genes Involved in TGF-β Signaling

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway plays a critical role in regulating cell growth, differentiation, and ECM production. Mutations in genes encoding components of the TGF-β pathway are the most common cause of HTAD. FBN1, which encodes fibrillin-1, is the gene most frequently associated with Marfan syndrome, a connective tissue disorder characterized by aortic aneurysms and dissections. Fibrillin-1 is a major component of microfibrils, which provide structural support to the ECM and regulate TGF-β activation. Mutations in FBN1 lead to reduced fibrillin-1 levels and increased TGF-β signaling, contributing to aortic wall weakening.

Mutations in genes encoding TGF-β receptors, such as TGFBR1 and TGFBR2, are also associated with HTAD. These receptors mediate the intracellular signaling of TGF-β. Mutations in these genes can disrupt TGF-β signaling, leading to SMC dysfunction, ECM remodeling, and aortic wall weakening. Moreover, mutations in SMAD3 and SMAD4, which encode intracellular signaling molecules downstream of TGF-β receptors, have been identified in patients with HTAD. These mutations disrupt TGF-β signaling, contributing to aortic aneurysm formation and dissection. Loss-of-function mutations in these genes increase the risk of aortic events.

3.2. Genes Involved in Smooth Muscle Cell Contractility

Mutations in genes encoding components of the SMC contractile apparatus can also cause HTAD. ACTA2, which encodes α-smooth muscle actin, is frequently mutated in patients with familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAAD). α-Smooth muscle actin is a major component of the SMC contractile filaments. Mutations in ACTA2 disrupt SMC contractility and ECM remodeling, leading to aortic wall weakening. Mutations in MYH11, which encodes smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, are also associated with HTAD. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain is essential for SMC contraction. Mutations in MYH11 disrupt SMC contractility and aortic wall homeostasis, increasing the risk of aortic aneurysm formation and dissection. Moreover, mutations in PRKG1, which encodes cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1, have been identified in patients with HTAD. cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1 regulates SMC contractility and ECM remodeling. Mutations in PRKG1 disrupt SMC function and aortic wall integrity.

3.3. Genes Involved in Extracellular Matrix Homeostasis

Mutations in genes encoding ECM proteins or enzymes involved in ECM remodeling can also cause HTAD. COL3A1, which encodes type III collagen, is mutated in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS), a connective tissue disorder characterized by aortic aneurysms, dissections, and arterial rupture. Type III collagen is a major component of the ECM in arteries. Mutations in COL3A1 reduce the amount of functional type III collagen, leading to aortic wall weakening. Mutations in LOX, which encodes lysyl oxidase, are also associated with HTAD. Lysyl oxidase crosslinks collagen and elastin fibers, providing structural support to the ECM. Mutations in LOX disrupt ECM crosslinking and aortic wall integrity. Mutations in ADAMTS1, a metalloproteinase involved in ECM remodeling, also increases risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection.

3.4. Other Genes and Syndromes

Several other genes and genetic syndromes are associated with aortopathy. Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), characterized by arterial tortuosity, hypertelorism, and cleft palate, is caused by mutations in genes encoding TGF-β receptors (TGFBR1, TGFBR2) and downstream signaling molecules (SMAD3, TGFB2, TGFB3). Turner syndrome (TS), a chromosomal disorder affecting females, is associated with an increased risk of aortic coarctation, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic dissection. Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), a congenital heart defect characterized by two aortic valve leaflets instead of three, is also associated with an increased risk of aortopathy, independent of genetic syndromes.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Diagnostic Methods

Early detection and accurate diagnosis of aortopathy are crucial for preventing life-threatening complications. A variety of diagnostic methods are available, including imaging techniques, genetic testing, and clinical evaluation. Imaging techniques are the primary modality for assessing aortic size, morphology, and function. Genetic testing plays an increasingly important role in identifying individuals at risk for HTAD and guiding management decisions.

4.1. Imaging Techniques

4.1.1. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)

CTA is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses X-rays and contrast dye to visualize the aorta and its branches. CTA provides detailed anatomical information about aortic size, shape, and location, as well as the presence of aneurysms, dissections, and other abnormalities. CTA is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring aortopathy, particularly in acute settings such as aortic dissection. However, CTA involves radiation exposure and the use of contrast dye, which can be nephrotoxic in some patients.

4.1.2. Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)

MRA is another non-invasive imaging technique that uses magnetic fields and radio waves to visualize the aorta. MRA provides similar anatomical information as CTA, but without the use of ionizing radiation. MRA is particularly useful for monitoring aortic size and growth over time, as it can be performed repeatedly without significant risk. However, MRA is more expensive than CTA and may not be suitable for patients with metal implants or claustrophobia.

4.1.3. Echocardiography

Echocardiography uses ultrasound waves to visualize the heart and aorta. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a non-invasive technique that is useful for assessing the aortic root and ascending aorta. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a more invasive technique that involves inserting a probe into the esophagus to obtain clearer images of the aorta. Echocardiography is particularly useful for diagnosing aortic valve abnormalities and assessing aortic function. However, echocardiography has limited ability to visualize the descending aorta and abdominal aorta.

4.2. Genetic Testing

Genetic testing plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and management of aortopathy, particularly in individuals with suspected HTAD. Genetic testing can identify specific gene mutations that increase the risk of aortic aneurysm formation and dissection. Targeted gene sequencing, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing are all used to identify disease-causing mutations. Identifying the genetic cause of aortopathy can have important implications for patient management, including risk stratification, surveillance, and family screening. Genetic counseling is an essential component of genetic testing, providing patients and their families with information about the risks and benefits of genetic testing, the implications of test results, and the options for family screening and reproductive planning.

4.3. Clinical Evaluation

A thorough clinical evaluation is essential for diagnosing and managing aortopathy. A detailed medical history should be obtained, including information about risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, and family history of aortic disease. A physical examination should be performed to assess for signs of connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan syndrome or Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Blood pressure should be carefully monitored, and patients should be screened for other cardiovascular risk factors. In some cases, specialized cardiac testing, such as electrocardiography (ECG) or stress testing, may be necessary to assess cardiac function and identify associated cardiovascular abnormalities.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Management Strategies

The management of aortopathy involves a multidisciplinary approach, including medical therapy, surgical intervention, and lifestyle modifications. The goals of management are to prevent aortic aneurysm growth, reduce the risk of aortic dissection or rupture, and improve patient outcomes. Management strategies are tailored to the individual patient based on the size and location of the aortic aneurysm, the presence of associated risk factors, and the patient’s overall health status.

5.1. Medical Therapy

5.1.1. Blood Pressure Control

Blood pressure control is a cornerstone of medical therapy for aortopathy. High blood pressure increases the mechanical stress on the aortic wall, accelerating aneurysm growth and increasing the risk of dissection or rupture. Beta-blockers are the preferred first-line agents for blood pressure control in patients with aortopathy, particularly those with Marfan syndrome. Beta-blockers reduce the force of contraction of the heart and lower blood pressure, decreasing the stress on the aortic wall. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are also effective for blood pressure control in patients with aortopathy, and may be used in combination with beta-blockers.

5.1.2. Lipid Management

Lipid management is important for reducing the risk of atherosclerosis, a major risk factor for aortopathy. Statins are the preferred agents for lowering LDL cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Statins have also been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects, which may be beneficial in patients with aortopathy.

5.1.3. Other Medications

Other medications may be used to manage specific complications of aortopathy. Antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin, may be used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with aortic aneurysms. Anticoagulants, such as warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), may be used to prevent blood clots in patients with aortic dissections or valve abnormalities. In patients with Marfan syndrome, losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, is often prescribed to reduce TGF-β signaling and slow aortic aneurysm growth. However, more recent evidence suggests that losartan may not provide additional benefit beyond beta-blockers.

5.2. Surgical Intervention

Surgical intervention is indicated for patients with large aortic aneurysms, rapidly growing aneurysms, or aortic dissections. The goal of surgery is to replace the diseased segment of the aorta with a synthetic graft or to repair the aortic dissection. Several surgical techniques are available, including open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

5.2.1. Open Surgical Repair

Open surgical repair involves making an incision in the chest or abdomen to access the aorta and replace the diseased segment with a synthetic graft. Open surgical repair is typically performed for aneurysms of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta. Open surgical repair is a major surgery that carries significant risks, including bleeding, infection, stroke, and death. However, open surgical repair provides a durable repair and is the preferred treatment option for many patients with aortopathy.

5.2.2. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR)

EVAR is a minimally invasive procedure that involves inserting a stent graft through a small incision in the groin to reinforce the weakened section of the aorta. EVAR is typically performed for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and descending thoracic aorta. EVAR is less invasive than open surgical repair and carries a lower risk of complications. However, EVAR is not suitable for all patients with aortopathy, and may require re-intervention over time due to stent graft migration, endoleaks, or other complications.

5.3. Lifestyle Modifications

Lifestyle modifications are an important part of the management of aortopathy. Patients should be advised to avoid strenuous exercise, heavy lifting, and other activities that increase blood pressure and stress on the aorta. Smoking cessation is essential, as smoking increases the risk of atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm growth. Patients should also maintain a healthy diet, low in sodium and saturated fat, to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Regular follow-up with a cardiologist or vascular surgeon is essential for monitoring aortic size and function and adjusting management strategies as needed.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Emerging Therapies and Future Directions

Despite advances in the diagnosis and management of aortopathy, there is still a need for more effective therapies to prevent disease progression and improve patient outcomes. Emerging therapies and future research directions focus on targeting the underlying disease mechanisms, such as inflammation, ECM remodeling, and SMC dysfunction. Several promising therapeutic targets have been identified, including TGF-β signaling, MMPs, and inflammatory pathways.

6.1. Targeting TGF-β Signaling

The TGF-β signaling pathway is a major therapeutic target for aortopathy, particularly in patients with Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has been shown to reduce TGF-β signaling and slow aortic aneurysm growth in animal models and clinical trials. However, the effectiveness of losartan in preventing aortic events in humans remains controversial. Other TGF-β inhibitors, such as neutralizing antibodies and small molecule inhibitors, are under development and may offer more potent and specific inhibition of TGF-β signaling. Galunisertib, a selective inhibitor of the TGF-β type I receptor ALK5, has shown promise in preclinical studies and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of Marfan syndrome and other aortopathies.

6.2. Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs)

MMPs play a critical role in ECM remodeling in aortopathy. Inhibiting MMP activity may reduce ECM degradation and slow aortic aneurysm growth. Doxycycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, has been shown to inhibit MMP activity and reduce aortic aneurysm growth in animal models. However, clinical trials of doxycycline in patients with aortopathy have yielded mixed results. Other MMP inhibitors are under development and may offer more specific and potent inhibition of MMP activity. GM6001, a broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor, has shown promise in preclinical studies but has not yet been evaluated in clinical trials.

6.3. Targeting Inflammatory Pathways

Inflammation plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of aortopathy. Inhibiting inflammatory pathways may reduce aortic wall inflammation and slow aneurysm growth. Statins have been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects and may be beneficial in patients with aortopathy. Other anti-inflammatory agents, such as corticosteroids and TNF-α inhibitors, are under investigation for the treatment of aortopathy. Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-1β, is being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including aortopathy. It is important to note that chronic use of these agents can cause significant side effects and that trials using these agents should be carefully monitored.

6.4. Gene Therapy and Cell-Based Therapies

Gene therapy and cell-based therapies hold promise for the treatment of aortopathy by correcting genetic defects and restoring aortic wall function. Gene therapy involves delivering therapeutic genes to target cells to correct genetic mutations or enhance gene expression. Cell-based therapies involve transplanting cells, such as SMCs or endothelial progenitor cells, to the aortic wall to promote tissue repair and regeneration. These therapies are still in the early stages of development, but have shown promise in preclinical studies.

6.5. Epigenetic Modifications

Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, play a role in the pathogenesis of aortopathy. Epigenetic modifications can alter gene expression without changing the DNA sequence, influencing cell function and disease development. Understanding the role of epigenetic modifications in aortopathy may lead to the development of new therapeutic targets aimed at modifying gene expression and preventing disease progression.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion

Aortopathy is a complex and heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the aortic wall. The pathogenesis of aortopathy involves a complex interplay of biomechanical forces, cellular dysfunction, genetic mutations, and inflammation. Early detection and accurate diagnosis are crucial for preventing life-threatening complications. Management strategies include medical therapy, surgical intervention, and lifestyle modifications. Emerging therapies and future research directions focus on targeting the underlying disease mechanisms and developing more effective treatments to prevent disease progression and improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to better understand the pathogenesis of aortopathy and to develop novel therapeutic strategies that can prevent aortic aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

  1. Erbel, R., Aboyans, V., Boileau, C., Bossone, E., Bartolomeo, R. D., Eggebrecht, H., … & Frank, H. (2014). 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. European Heart Journal, 35(41), 2873-2926.
  2. Judge, D. P., & Dietz, H. C. (2005). Marfan’s syndrome. The Lancet, 366(9485), 196-208.
  3. Milewicz, D. M., Dietz, H. C., Miller, D. C., Pyeritz, R. E., Elefteriades, J. A., Kamiya, T., … & Consortium, G. E. (2005). Treatment of aortic disease in Marfan syndrome. Circulation, 111(1), e1-e7.
  4. Loeys, B. L., Schwarze, U., Holm, T., Callewaert, B. L., Thomas, G., Pannu, H., … & Dietz, H. C. (2006). Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-β receptor. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(8), 788-798.
  5. Ramanath, V. S., Ohmes, L. B., Eagle, K. A., & Montgomery, D. G. (2009). Acute aortic syndromes. Cardiology Clinics, 28(2), 207-223.
  6. Hiratzka, L. F., Bakris, G. L., Beckman, J. A., Bersin, R. M., Carr, M. E., Dzau, V. J., … & American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2010). 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55(14), e27-e129.
  7. Kentish, J. C., Wotherspoon, A. L., & Pepke-Zaba, J. (2003). Genetics of aortic aneurysm. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40(11), 793-800.
  8. Lindeman, R. A., Lai, J. W., Redwood, S. R., & Marwick, T. H. (2008). Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of aortic aneurysms and dissections. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 21(7), 767-778.
  9. Groenink, M., den Ruijter, H. M., De Backer, J., Timmermans, J., Cohnen, A., Halliday, B., … & CARE-EU study group. (2013). Marfan syndrome: current knowledge and future directions. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 10(10), 567-576.
  10. D’Oria, M., Ferraresi, R., Spaziani, G., De Matteis, G., Pascali, D., Gagliardi, G., … & Vizzardi, E. (2023). Genetic Basis of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections (TAADs). Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(4), 648.
  11. Forteza, A. M., O’Donnell, C. P., & Tinajero, F. (2017). Losartan for prevention of aortic dilation in Marfan syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (12).

3 Comments

  1. The discussion on inflammation’s role in aortopathy is particularly compelling. Could research into targeted anti-inflammatory therapies, perhaps focusing on specific cytokines or immune cell interactions within the aortic wall, offer a less broad approach than current options like statins?

    • Thanks for highlighting the inflammation aspect! It’s definitely an area ripe for exploration. Your point about targeted therapies is spot-on. Focusing on specific cytokines or immune cell interactions could indeed be a game-changer, potentially offering a more precise and effective approach than current broad anti-inflammatory strategies. Exciting possibilities ahead! What are your thoughts on specific targets?

      Editor: MedTechNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  2. The review highlights biomechanical factors like shear stress impacting aortic wall homeostasis. Could further investigation into modulating these forces, perhaps through novel device interventions or targeted exercise regimens, offer a complementary or alternative therapeutic strategy alongside pharmacological approaches?

Leave a Reply to Henry Pope Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*