Exoskeletal Robotics: A Comprehensive Review of Technology, Applications, and Future Directions

Abstract

Exoskeletal robotics represents a rapidly evolving field with the potential to revolutionize numerous sectors, ranging from healthcare and rehabilitation to industrial manufacturing and military applications. This comprehensive review delves into the multifaceted landscape of exoskeletons, encompassing their diverse classifications (full-body, partial, soft, and hard), underlying mechanisms (powered and passive), and current applications, with a specific focus on augmenting mobility and strength in aging populations and individuals with disabilities. Beyond a technological overview, the report critically assesses the key challenges inherent in the design, implementation, and widespread adoption of exosuits, including cost-effectiveness, usability, safety protocols, and relevant regulatory frameworks. Furthermore, it examines the effectiveness and user acceptance of existing exosuit technologies, highlighting both the potential benefits and inherent limitations. Finally, this report explores emerging trends and future directions within exoskeletal robotics, considering advancements in artificial intelligence, sensor technologies, and materials science, and their impact on the future trajectory of the field. This review is intended for experts in the field of robotics, engineering and medicine and therefore does not spend time on basic introductory concepts.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The development of exoskeletal devices has transitioned from science fiction to tangible reality over the past few decades. Driven by advancements in materials science, actuators, control systems, and increasingly, artificial intelligence, these devices offer the potential to enhance human capabilities, assist with physical rehabilitation, and improve the quality of life for individuals with mobility impairments. While early exoskeletons were primarily focused on military applications and heavy lifting, the focus has increasingly shifted towards medical and assistive applications. This review seeks to provide an in-depth examination of the current state-of-the-art in exoskeletal robotics, focusing on the technological underpinnings, diverse applications, and remaining challenges that hinder widespread adoption.

The scope of this review is broad, encompassing both rigid and soft exoskeletons, powered and passive systems, and applications ranging from rehabilitation to industrial augmentation. We will critically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different design approaches, evaluate the effectiveness of existing technologies, and explore the key factors that influence user acceptance. Furthermore, we will address the ethical and societal implications of exoskeletal technology, including concerns about job displacement, privacy, and the potential for misuse.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Classification of Exoskeletons

Exoskeletons can be categorized based on several key characteristics, including their structural design, actuation method, and intended application. Understanding these classifications is crucial for selecting the appropriate exoskeleton for a specific task or user.

2.1. Structural Design

• Full-Body Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons encompass the entire body, typically from the feet to the head, providing support and assistance to all major joints. They are often used in applications requiring significant strength augmentation or for individuals with severe mobility impairments. Full-body exoskeletons are complex systems that require sophisticated control algorithms and powerful actuators. Challenges include achieving natural and coordinated movements, ensuring user safety, and managing power consumption.

• Partial Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons focus on specific body parts, such as the legs, arms, or back. They are more common than full-body exoskeletons due to their reduced complexity and improved usability. Leg exoskeletons are often used for gait rehabilitation or to assist with walking in individuals with spinal cord injuries. Arm exoskeletons can be used to support workers in industrial settings or to assist individuals with upper limb weakness. Back exoskeletons are designed to reduce the risk of back injuries by providing support and stability to the lumbar region.

• Hard Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons are constructed from rigid materials, such as metal or carbon fiber. They provide high levels of support and stability, making them suitable for applications requiring significant strength augmentation or for individuals with severe mobility impairments. Hard exoskeletons typically rely on powered actuators to generate movement.

• Soft Exoskeletons (Exosuits): These exoskeletons are made from flexible materials, such as textiles, polymers, and cables. They are generally lighter and more comfortable than hard exoskeletons, making them more suitable for prolonged use. Soft exoskeletons can be either powered or passive, and they are often used to assist with movement and reduce muscle fatigue. An emerging trend is the use of pneumatic or fluidic actuation in soft exosuits to generate force. Control strategies for soft exosuits differ significantly from those used for hard exoskeletons due to the compliant nature of the materials. The challenge lies in accurately predicting and controlling the interaction between the suit and the user’s body.

2.2. Actuation Method

• Powered Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons utilize motors, pneumatic cylinders, or hydraulic actuators to generate movement. They can provide significant strength augmentation and are often used in applications requiring repetitive or strenuous tasks. Powered exoskeletons require a power source, such as a battery or an external power supply. Control strategies for powered exoskeletons must account for the user’s intentions and the external environment.

• Passive Exoskeletons: These exoskeletons do not utilize actuators to generate movement. Instead, they rely on springs, dampers, or other mechanical components to store and release energy, reducing the effort required for certain tasks. Passive exoskeletons are generally lighter and less expensive than powered exoskeletons, but they provide less strength augmentation. They are often used to support workers in industrial settings or to assist with specific movements, such as lifting or bending. Passive exoskeletons are well-suited for tasks involving cyclical motion where energy can be efficiently stored and released.

2.3. Control System.

• Rigid Exoskeleton Control – As a general rule of thumb, rigid exoskeletons have a highly complex control system, this is due to the rigid structure, the user must be aligned correctly inside of the exoskeleton and any movement of the exoskeleton must be performed accurately or injuries can occur. Rigid exoskeletons are usually controlled via a sophisticated computer system that takes user commands and sensor data to move the exoskeleton in a coordinated manner. These systems are usually highly complex to develop and commission.

• Soft Exoskeleton Control – Because soft exoskeletons are less rigid than their rigid counterparts, they do not need such a precise control system. Some types of soft exoskeletons can be controlled using artificial intelligence, allowing the computer system to determine how to move the exoskeleton in order to achieve the desired outcome. However, this is only useful if the soft exoskeleton uses electric motors, some soft exoskeletons are purely mechanical or pneumatic and therefore do not have the capacity for electronic controls. Due to the increased availability of advanced sensors, soft exoskeletons are starting to trend more towards AI controlled systems. AI algorithms are being developed to determine and predict when the user needs assistance and the system can then provide this assistance seamlessly.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Applications of Exoskeletons

Exoskeletons have a wide range of potential applications across various sectors, including healthcare, industrial manufacturing, military, and consumer markets.

3.1. Healthcare and Rehabilitation

Exoskeletons have shown promising results in assisting with gait rehabilitation, improving mobility for individuals with spinal cord injuries, and providing support for individuals with muscle weakness or neurological disorders. They can be used to train patients to walk again after a stroke or to assist individuals with cerebral palsy in performing daily activities. Research has demonstrated that exoskeletons can improve gait speed, stride length, and balance in individuals with mobility impairments. Furthermore, exoskeletons can reduce the risk of falls and improve overall quality of life. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of exoskeletons for rehabilitation depends on the individual’s condition and the specific exoskeleton used. Customization and personalized training are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes.

3.2. Industrial Manufacturing

Exoskeletons can reduce the risk of injuries and improve productivity in industrial settings by providing support for repetitive or strenuous tasks. They can be used to assist workers in lifting heavy objects, performing overhead work, or maintaining awkward postures. Studies have shown that exoskeletons can reduce muscle fatigue, lower back pain, and the incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The automotive industry, construction, and logistics are among the sectors that have adopted exoskeletons to improve worker safety and efficiency. However, the cost of exoskeletons and the need for proper training and maintenance are important considerations for industrial adoption. The impact of exoskeletons on long-term health and well-being also requires further investigation.

3.3. Military Applications

Early development in exoskeletons was driven by military applications. Exoskeletons can enhance soldier’s strength, endurance, and carrying capacity, allowing them to perform tasks more efficiently and safely. They can be used to assist with heavy lifting, reduce fatigue during long marches, and improve mobility in difficult terrain. Several military organizations are currently developing and testing exoskeletons for various applications, including logistics, combat support, and search and rescue. The design of military exoskeletons must consider factors such as durability, weight, power consumption, and compatibility with existing equipment. Ethical concerns surrounding the use of exoskeletons in warfare also need to be addressed.

3.4. Consumer Market

The consumer market for exoskeletons is still in its early stages, but there is growing interest in using these devices for recreational activities, personal mobility, and fitness training. Exoskeletons could be used to assist with hiking, cycling, or other outdoor activities. They could also be used to improve mobility for older adults or individuals with mild mobility impairments. However, the cost of exoskeletons and the lack of widespread availability are major barriers to consumer adoption. Furthermore, the safety and usability of exoskeletons for everyday use need to be carefully evaluated.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Challenges in Design and Implementation

The design and implementation of exoskeletons present several significant challenges, including cost, usability, safety, and regulatory considerations.

4.1. Cost

The high cost of exoskeletons is a major barrier to widespread adoption. The cost of materials, components, manufacturing, and development can be significant. Furthermore, the cost of maintenance, repair, and training must also be considered. Reducing the cost of exoskeletons is crucial for making them more accessible to a wider range of users. This can be achieved through advancements in materials science, manufacturing processes, and control systems. Value engineering is a key strategy for optimizing the design and reducing the cost of exoskeletons without compromising performance or safety.

4.2. Usability

Exoskeletons must be easy to use and comfortable to wear. They should not restrict the user’s natural movements or cause discomfort. The design of exoskeletons should consider factors such as weight, size, adjustability, and user interface. Furthermore, the control system should be intuitive and responsive to the user’s intentions. User training is also essential for ensuring safe and effective use. The effectiveness of the exoskeleton is heavily dependent on the ability of the user to wear and interact with the technology in an intuitive and seamless fashion.

4.3. Safety

Safety is a paramount concern in the design and implementation of exoskeletons. Exoskeletons must be designed to prevent injuries to the user and bystanders. This includes incorporating safety features such as emergency stop mechanisms, collision avoidance systems, and overload protection. The control system should also be designed to prevent unexpected or uncontrolled movements. Rigorous testing and validation are essential for ensuring the safety of exoskeletons. Safety standards and regulations are needed to ensure that exoskeletons meet minimum safety requirements.

4.4. Regulatory Considerations

The regulatory landscape for exoskeletons is still evolving. In many countries, there are no specific regulations governing the design, manufacture, and sale of exoskeletons. This can create uncertainty for manufacturers and users. Regulatory frameworks are needed to ensure the safety and efficacy of exoskeletons and to promote innovation in the field. The FDA in the United States and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Europe are actively working on developing guidelines and regulations for medical exoskeletons. These regulations will likely address issues such as device classification, clinical trials, and post-market surveillance.

4.5 Power Source.

Power is a constant challenge in exoskeletons. The more that the exoskeletons have to perform, the more power that they require. Exoskeletons require a power source in order to function and these power sources are often batteries. As battery power reduces the use of the exoskeleton becomes limited. This means that more time is taken up charging the devices, or operators have to manage multiple power packs. Exoskeleton designers are working on ways to use less power and also to recharge their batteries more quickly. Using regenerative braking can help to recharge the batteries on the move. Future designs must prioritize higher-density power sources and energy-efficient designs.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Effectiveness and User Acceptance

The effectiveness and user acceptance of exoskeletons are critical factors influencing their widespread adoption. Evaluating the effectiveness of exoskeletons requires objective measures of performance, such as gait speed, strength, endurance, and range of motion. User acceptance depends on factors such as comfort, usability, aesthetics, and perceived benefits.

5.1. Objective Measures of Performance

Clinical trials and research studies have demonstrated that exoskeletons can improve various aspects of physical performance. For example, studies have shown that exoskeletons can increase gait speed and stride length in individuals with spinal cord injuries. They can also increase strength and endurance in workers performing repetitive lifting tasks. However, the magnitude of these improvements can vary depending on the individual’s condition, the specific exoskeleton used, and the training protocol. Standardized outcome measures are needed to facilitate comparisons across different studies and exoskeletons.

5.2. Subjective Measures of User Acceptance

User acceptance is influenced by a variety of factors, including comfort, usability, aesthetics, and perceived benefits. Exoskeletons that are uncomfortable or difficult to use are less likely to be accepted by users. The design of exoskeletons should consider the user’s preferences and needs. Furthermore, users need to be educated about the benefits of exoskeletons and how to use them safely and effectively. Qualitative studies, such as interviews and focus groups, can provide valuable insights into user perceptions and experiences.

5.3. Ethical and Societal Implications

The widespread adoption of exoskeletons raises several ethical and societal implications. One concern is the potential for job displacement if exoskeletons automate tasks that are currently performed by human workers. Another concern is the potential for misuse of exoskeletons, such as enhancing the performance of athletes or soldiers beyond ethical limits. Privacy concerns may also arise if exoskeletons collect data about the user’s movements or activities. These ethical and societal implications need to be carefully considered as exoskeletal technology advances.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Future Directions

The field of exoskeletal robotics is rapidly evolving, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, sensor technologies, and materials science. Several emerging trends are shaping the future of exoskeletons.

6.1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

AI and machine learning are playing an increasingly important role in the control and adaptation of exoskeletons. AI algorithms can be used to predict the user’s intentions, optimize the exoskeleton’s movements, and adapt to the user’s individual needs. Machine learning can be used to train exoskeletons to recognize and respond to different environments and tasks. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are also being explored as a means of controlling exoskeletons using brain signals. Future research will focus on developing more sophisticated and robust AI algorithms for exoskeletal control.

6.2. Sensor Technologies

Advanced sensor technologies are enabling exoskeletons to gather more information about the user and the environment. Inertial measurement units (IMUs), force sensors, and electromyography (EMG) sensors are used to measure the user’s movements, forces, and muscle activity. Computer vision and depth sensors are used to perceive the environment and detect obstacles. This information can be used to improve the control and safety of exoskeletons. Future research will focus on developing smaller, lighter, and more accurate sensors for exoskeletal applications.

6.3. Materials Science

Advancements in materials science are enabling the development of lighter, stronger, and more flexible exoskeletons. New materials such as carbon fiber composites, shape memory alloys, and smart textiles are being used to improve the performance and comfort of exoskeletons. Soft exoskeletons are gaining popularity due to their flexibility and conformability. Future research will focus on developing new materials with enhanced properties and on integrating these materials into exoskeletal designs.

6.4. Personalization and Customization

Future exoskeletons will be increasingly personalized and customized to meet the individual needs of each user. This includes developing exoskeletons that can be easily adjusted to fit different body sizes and shapes. It also includes developing control systems that can be customized to the user’s preferences and abilities. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) is enabling the rapid prototyping and customization of exoskeletal components. Future research will focus on developing more efficient and scalable methods for personalizing and customizing exoskeletons.

6.5. Hybrid Exoskeletons

An emerging trend is the development of hybrid exoskeletons that combine the advantages of both rigid and soft exoskeletons. These hybrid systems may incorporate rigid components for support and stability and soft components for flexibility and comfort. Hybrid exoskeletons can be tailored to specific applications and user needs. Future research will focus on developing novel hybrid designs and control strategies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion

Exoskeletal robotics is a rapidly advancing field with the potential to transform numerous sectors. While significant progress has been made in recent years, several challenges remain to be addressed before exoskeletons can achieve widespread adoption. These challenges include cost, usability, safety, regulatory considerations, and ethical implications. Future research will focus on developing more affordable, user-friendly, safe, and ethical exoskeletons. Advancements in artificial intelligence, sensor technologies, and materials science will play a crucial role in shaping the future of exoskeletal robotics. With continued research and development, exoskeletons have the potential to improve the quality of life for individuals with mobility impairments, enhance worker safety and productivity, and enable new possibilities in various fields.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Dollar, A. M., & Herr, H. (2008). Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(1), 144-158.
• Esquenazi, A., & Packel, A. (2012). Clinical applications of robotics in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 91(11), 969-979.
• Kazerooni, H. (2012). Human power augmentation. University of California, Berkeley, USA.
• Kiguchi, K. (2012). Brain-machine interface for robot control. Advanced Robotics, 26(1-2), 1-21.
• Malcolm, P., et al. (2018). Compliant exosuits for human movement augmentation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1-16.
• Bogue, R. (2009). Exoskeletons and robotic prosthetics: technology, design, and control. CRC press.
• Young, A. J., Ferris, D. P., & Remy, C. D. (2015). More than meets the eye: Current issues and future directions in the control of lower limb exoskeletons. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 12(1), 1-12.
• Contreras-Vidal, J. L., Borhani, A., & Francisco, G. E. (2016). Brain-machine interfaces for lower limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future directions. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 13(6), 543-553.
• de Looze, M. P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential contribution to the circular economy., Elsevier, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 806, 2022, 151050, ISSN 0048-9697,,
• Grabowski, A. M., & Dhaher, Y. Y. (2022). The potential benefits and limitations of lower limb exoskeletons. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 50(5), 599-612.