The Multidimensional Burden of Poverty: Unveiling its Impact on Cancer Outcomes Across the Lifespan

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

Poverty is a pervasive global issue with profound and far-reaching consequences for health outcomes. This research report delves into the intricate relationship between poverty and cancer, extending beyond the specific context of childhood cancer and exploring the broader impact across the lifespan. We examine the complex pathways through which poverty influences cancer incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and survival. This includes investigating the role of socioeconomic determinants of health, such as access to healthcare, nutritional deficiencies, environmental exposures, chronic stress, and the availability of social support. Furthermore, we critically analyze existing interventions and policies aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of poverty on cancer outcomes, considering their effectiveness and potential limitations. The report emphasizes the urgent need for a multi-faceted, integrated approach involving social safety nets, community-based programs, policy reforms, and healthcare system improvements to address the pervasive inequalities in cancer care and improve the lives of individuals affected by poverty and cancer.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Poverty, defined not merely as a lack of financial resources but as a multidimensional condition encompassing deprivation in health, education, living standards, security, and voice (Alkire & Foster, 2011), remains a persistent and pervasive global challenge. Its impact extends far beyond basic survival, significantly influencing health outcomes across the lifespan. While the association between poverty and overall poor health is well-established, the specific mechanisms through which poverty impacts cancer – a complex and heterogeneous group of diseases – are less thoroughly understood. Cancer, increasingly recognized as a disease of aging but impacting all ages, poses a significant public health burden, and its unequal distribution across socioeconomic strata highlights the urgent need for targeted interventions.

Existing literature suggests that individuals living in poverty experience higher cancer incidence rates for certain types of cancer, are often diagnosed at later stages, receive suboptimal treatment, and have poorer survival outcomes (Bradley et al., 2008; Singh & Jemal, 2017). This disparity is not simply a matter of individual choices or genetic predispositions; rather, it is a product of a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors that influence exposure to risk factors, access to preventive services, timely diagnosis, and appropriate treatment. Understanding these pathways is crucial for developing effective strategies to reduce cancer-related health disparities.

This research report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the relationship between poverty and cancer outcomes across the lifespan. It examines the specific socioeconomic determinants of health that mediate this relationship, evaluates the effectiveness of existing interventions, and proposes recommendations for future research and policy initiatives. By synthesizing evidence from diverse disciplines, including epidemiology, sociology, economics, and public health, this report seeks to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complex challenges faced by individuals living in poverty who are affected by cancer.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Socioeconomic Determinants of Health and Cancer

The socioeconomic determinants of health (SDOH) are the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes. These include economic stability, education, social and community context, health and healthcare, and neighborhood and built environment (HealthyPeople.gov). Poverty intersects with and exacerbates these determinants, creating a complex web of disadvantage that significantly impacts cancer risk and outcomes.

2.1. Access to Healthcare

Poverty acts as a major barrier to accessing timely and quality healthcare. Individuals experiencing poverty are often uninsured or underinsured, limiting their ability to afford preventative screenings, diagnostic tests, and treatment. Geographic accessibility is also a significant issue, with many low-income communities lacking adequate healthcare facilities and specialists. Transportation costs, language barriers, and cultural differences further impede access to care. Even when care is accessible, navigating complex healthcare systems and managing chronic conditions can be overwhelming for individuals with limited resources and health literacy (Baumgartner et al., 2018). This delayed or inadequate access leads to late-stage diagnoses, reduced treatment options, and ultimately, poorer survival rates.

The quality of care received can also be affected by socioeconomic status. Studies have shown that patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may receive less aggressive treatment, experience longer wait times, and encounter communication barriers with healthcare providers (Bach et al., 2004). Implicit bias among healthcare professionals, even unintentional, can contribute to these disparities.

2.2. Nutritional Deficiencies

Poor nutrition is a common consequence of poverty, and it plays a significant role in cancer risk and prognosis. Limited access to affordable, nutritious foods, often replaced by inexpensive, calorie-dense but nutrient-poor options, contributes to obesity, micronutrient deficiencies, and overall poor health. Obesity is a known risk factor for several types of cancer, including breast, colon, endometrial, and kidney cancer (Lauby-Secretan et al., 2016). Micronutrient deficiencies, such as deficiencies in vitamins A, C, D, and folate, can impair immune function and increase susceptibility to cancer development.

Furthermore, dietary patterns established in childhood often persist into adulthood, potentially increasing the long-term risk of cancer for individuals who grow up in poverty. Targeted interventions focusing on promoting healthy eating habits and improving access to nutritious foods in low-income communities are crucial for preventing cancer and improving health outcomes.

2.3. Environmental Exposures

Low-income communities are often disproportionately exposed to environmental hazards that increase cancer risk. These hazards include air and water pollution from industrial facilities, exposure to toxic chemicals in the workplace, and living in substandard housing with exposure to lead paint and asbestos (Morello-Frosch & Shenassa, 2006). Residents of these communities may also lack access to safe recreational spaces and clean drinking water, further contributing to environmental health disparities.

Occupational exposures are particularly relevant for low-wage workers, who may be employed in industries with high levels of carcinogenic substances. Lack of adequate safety regulations and enforcement in these industries can further exacerbate the risk of cancer among vulnerable populations. Addressing environmental injustices and implementing stricter environmental regulations in low-income communities are essential for reducing cancer risk.

2.4. Chronic Stress

Poverty is a chronic stressor that can have profound effects on the body’s physiological systems. Chronic stress can dysregulate the immune system, increase inflammation, and promote the development of cancer (Reiche et al., 2004). The constant worry about financial insecurity, housing instability, and food insecurity can lead to chronic stress, which can further impair decision-making and health-seeking behaviors. Moreover, the stress of discrimination and social isolation experienced by marginalized communities can also contribute to chronic stress and its associated health risks.

The impact of chronic stress on cancer outcomes is complex and multifaceted. Stress can affect tumor growth and metastasis, as well as the effectiveness of cancer treatments. Interventions aimed at reducing stress and promoting resilience, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and social support programs, may improve cancer outcomes for individuals living in poverty.

2.5. Social Support

Social support plays a crucial role in coping with cancer and improving overall health outcomes. Individuals with strong social support networks are more likely to adhere to treatment plans, manage side effects, and experience improved quality of life (Uchino, 2006). However, individuals living in poverty often lack access to adequate social support due to factors such as social isolation, limited access to transportation, and time constraints. Social isolation can be particularly challenging for cancer patients, who may experience feelings of loneliness and depression. Strengthening social support networks through community-based programs and peer support groups can help improve cancer outcomes for vulnerable populations.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Cancer Type Specific Associations with Poverty

While poverty negatively influences overall cancer outcomes, certain cancer types exhibit particularly strong associations with socioeconomic disadvantage. These associations stem from the combined effects of lifestyle factors, environmental exposures, and access to screening and preventative care.

• Cervical Cancer: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates are significantly higher among low-income women, primarily due to limited access to Pap smears and HPV vaccinations. Socioeconomic factors also contribute to increased risk of HPV infection, the main cause of cervical cancer (Sawaya et al., 2001). Effective interventions include expanding access to affordable cervical cancer screening programs and increasing HPV vaccination rates in low-income communities.

• Lung Cancer: Smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer, and smoking prevalence is higher among individuals living in poverty. Additionally, low-income communities are often exposed to higher levels of air pollution, further increasing the risk of lung cancer. Targeted interventions aimed at reducing smoking rates and improving air quality in these communities are essential for preventing lung cancer (Hiscock et al., 2012).

• Colorectal Cancer: Colorectal cancer screening rates are lower among individuals living in poverty, leading to later-stage diagnoses and poorer survival outcomes. Access to colonoscopies and other screening tests is often limited by cost and transportation barriers. Increasing access to affordable colorectal cancer screening programs and promoting healthy dietary habits can help reduce the burden of this disease in low-income populations (Deitz et al., 2000).

• Gastric Cancer: Infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a major risk factor for gastric cancer, and infection rates are higher in low-income populations due to poor sanitation and hygiene. Screening for and treating H. pylori infection can help reduce the risk of gastric cancer, but access to these services is often limited in resource-constrained settings (Fockens et al., 2017).

• Liver Cancer: Chronic hepatitis B and C infections are major risk factors for liver cancer, and these infections are more prevalent in low-income populations. Vaccination against hepatitis B and treatment for hepatitis C can help prevent liver cancer, but access to these services is often limited by cost and other barriers (El-Serag, 2011).

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Effective Interventions and Policies

Addressing the impact of poverty on cancer outcomes requires a multi-faceted approach that includes interventions at the individual, community, and policy levels.

4.1. Social Safety Nets

Social safety nets, such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and housing assistance programs, can help alleviate poverty and improve access to basic necessities. These programs can reduce financial stress, improve nutrition, and provide stable housing, all of which can positively impact cancer outcomes. Studies have shown that access to social safety net programs is associated with improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs (Garthwaite et al., 2014). Strengthening and expanding these programs can help reduce the burden of poverty on cancer patients.

4.2. Community Health Programs

Community health programs can play a vital role in addressing health disparities and improving cancer outcomes in low-income communities. These programs can provide culturally tailored education, screening services, and navigation assistance to help individuals access healthcare and manage their health conditions. Community health workers can serve as trusted messengers, building rapport with community members and addressing their specific needs and concerns. Effective community health programs are often integrated with existing healthcare systems and social service agencies to provide comprehensive support (Fisher et al., 2007).

4.3. Policy Reforms

Policy reforms are essential for addressing the root causes of poverty and health disparities. Policies that promote economic opportunity, improve access to education, and ensure affordable healthcare can have a significant impact on cancer outcomes. Raising the minimum wage, expanding access to childcare, and investing in affordable housing can help reduce poverty and improve the health of low-income families. Policies that address environmental injustices and promote healthy communities are also crucial for reducing cancer risk. Furthermore, policies that ensure equitable access to cancer screening and treatment, regardless of socioeconomic status, are essential for reducing health disparities (Deaton, 2013).

Specifically, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in the United States aimed to expand health insurance coverage and improve access to preventative services. While the ACA has reduced the uninsured rate, significant disparities remain, and ongoing efforts are needed to ensure that all individuals have access to affordable and quality healthcare. Furthermore, Medicaid expansion has been shown to improve cancer outcomes in participating states, highlighting the importance of policies that promote access to healthcare for low-income individuals.

4.4. Healthcare System Improvements

Healthcare systems must be redesigned to be more responsive to the needs of low-income patients. This includes implementing culturally competent care, improving communication, and addressing language barriers. Patient navigation programs can help individuals navigate the complex healthcare system and access the services they need. Telehealth and mobile health technologies can also improve access to care for individuals living in rural or underserved areas. Furthermore, healthcare providers need to be trained to recognize and address the social determinants of health that impact their patients’ health outcomes (Kaplan et al., 2005).

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges and Future Directions

Despite the growing awareness of the relationship between poverty and cancer outcomes, significant challenges remain in addressing this complex issue. One major challenge is the lack of comprehensive data on the socioeconomic status of cancer patients. Many cancer registries do not collect information on income, education, or housing status, making it difficult to track disparities and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Investing in data collection and analysis is crucial for improving our understanding of the impact of poverty on cancer.

Another challenge is the complexity of the pathways through which poverty impacts cancer outcomes. Poverty is a multifaceted issue that intersects with numerous other factors, such as race, ethnicity, gender, and geography. It is important to consider these interactions when designing interventions and policies. Furthermore, interventions need to be tailored to the specific needs and contexts of different communities.

Future research should focus on identifying the most effective interventions for reducing cancer-related health disparities. This includes conducting rigorous evaluations of existing programs and developing new interventions that address the root causes of poverty and inequality. Research is also needed to understand the long-term impact of poverty on cancer outcomes and to identify strategies for preventing cancer in vulnerable populations. It is also important to better understand the effect of implicit bias in healthcare settings, and to develop interventions to reduce these effects.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

Poverty is a powerful determinant of cancer outcomes, influencing cancer incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and survival. The socioeconomic determinants of health, such as access to healthcare, nutritional deficiencies, environmental exposures, chronic stress, and social support, mediate this relationship. Addressing the impact of poverty on cancer requires a multi-faceted approach that includes social safety nets, community health programs, policy reforms, and healthcare system improvements. By investing in these interventions, we can reduce cancer-related health disparities and improve the lives of individuals affected by poverty and cancer. Moving forward, collaborative efforts involving researchers, policymakers, healthcare providers, and community organizations are essential for creating a more equitable and just healthcare system where everyone has the opportunity to thrive, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 476-487.
• Bach, P. B., Schrag, D., Brawley, O. W., Galaznik, A., Yakren, S., & Begg, C. B. (2004). Survival of blacks and whites after a cancer diagnosis. JAMA, 291(6), 756-764.
• Baumgartner, K. B., Beamer, P. I., Omasta, A. T., Harris, R. B., Leischman, J. S., Staten, L. K., … & Hayes-Jordan, A. (2018). Social determinants of health and childhood cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 11(1), 101-117.
• Bradley, C. J., Given, C. W., & Roberts, C. (2008). Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 58(2), 67-86.
• Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton University Press.
• Deitz, A. C., Lapham, S. C., Wiseman, M. C., & Lanier, A. P. (2000). Colorectal cancer screening in a rural Native American population. Preventive Medicine, 31(5), 484-490.
• El-Serag, H. B. (2011). Epidemiology of viral hepatitis: Implications for liver cancer. Clinics in Liver Disease, 15(1), 1-16.
• Fisher, E. B., Boothroyd, R. I., Couillard, A. E., Everett, W., Hawkins, J., Knowles, M., … & Sallis, J. F. (2007). Community-based participatory research approaches to health disparities: a systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 97(9), 1632-1641.
• Fockens, P., Bruno, M. J., Dekker, E., Fockens, P., Ginsberg, G. G., Hawes, R. H., … & Wani, S. (2017). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Garthwaite, C. L., Gross, T., & Udelhofer, T. (2014). How do food stamps affect health? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 151-182.
• HealthyPeople.gov. Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
• Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafo, M. (2012). Socioeconomic status and smoking: a systematic review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1248(1), 1-23.
• Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., & Meterko, M. (2005). Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Medical Care, 43(9 Suppl), IS39-IS47.
• Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., Grosse, Y., Bianchini, F., & Straif, K. (2016). Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(8), 794-798.
• Morello-Frosch, R., & Shenassa, E. D. (2006). The environmental “riskscape” and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health outcomes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(8), 1150-1153.
• Reiche, E. M. V., Nunes, S. O. V., & Morimoto, H. K. (2004). Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. The Lancet Oncology, 5(10), 617-625.
• Sawaya, G. F., Brown, A. D., Washington, A. E., & Mandelblatt, J. S. (2001). Current approaches to cervical-cancer screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(21), 1603-1612.
• Singh, G. K., & Jemal, A. (2017). Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in the United States, 1950-2014: over six decades of changing patterns and widening inequalities. Journal of Community Health, 42(2), 256-281.
• Uchino, B. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to long-term health outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 377-387.