Non-Immersive Virtual Reality in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Analysis of Technical Implementations, Applications, Efficacy, and Future Directions

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

Non-Immersive Virtual Reality (NIVR) has rapidly emerged as a highly accessible and versatile transformative tool within the healthcare landscape. Distinguished from its immersive counterparts by its reliance on readily available computing devices rather than specialized head-mounted displays, NIVR delivers compelling therapeutic experiences across a broad spectrum of medical domains. This comprehensive report meticulously explores the foundational technical implementations and diverse platform architectures underpinning NIVR systems. It delves into its expansive applications in healthcare, extending significantly beyond elder care to encompass intricate facets of neurorehabilitation, sophisticated pain management strategies, and advanced cognitive therapy interventions. Furthermore, the report presents an in-depth analysis of detailed clinical studies, scrutinizing their findings on NIVR’s efficacy and critically examining factors influencing user adoption rates across varied patient populations. Finally, it addresses the persistent challenges inherent in developing and deploying tailored NIVR content, proposing best practices to ensure inclusivity and effectiveness while catering to a wide range of cognitive and physical abilities.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction: The Evolving Landscape of Virtual Reality in Healthcare

Virtual Reality (VR) represents a paradigm shift in human-computer interaction, offering simulated environments that can profoundly enhance human experience and learning. Its revolutionary potential has permeated numerous sectors, with healthcare emerging as a particularly fertile ground for innovation. Within the broader VR ecosystem, Non-Immersive Virtual Reality (NIVR) has carved a distinct niche, primarily due to its inherent accessibility, ease of integration, and reduced hardware demands, making it exceptionally well-suited for diverse patient populations, including vulnerable groups such as older adults, pediatric patients, and individuals with specific physical or cognitive limitations.

Unlike fully immersive VR (IVR) which typically necessitates specialized head-mounted displays (HMDs) that can induce motion sickness or present logistical barriers in clinical settings, NIVR systems are designed to operate on standard, ubiquitous computing devices. These commonly include personal computers (PCs), laptops, tablets, and smartphones. This fundamental difference eliminates the need for expensive, specialized headsets or complex motion-tracking devices, thereby lowering the barrier to entry significantly. The inherent simplicity of NIVR hardware and software facilitates broader adoption, streamlines integration into existing healthcare infrastructures, and enables widespread deployment in diverse clinical and home-based care environments. The confluence of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and therapeutic versatility positions NIVR as a critical enabler for democratizing advanced digital health interventions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Technical Implementations and Platform Architectures of NIVR Systems

NIVR systems are fundamentally characterized by their user-friendly interfaces, minimal hardware footprint, and robust software architectures. The technical framework of a typical NIVR solution comprises several interconnected components, each playing a crucial role in delivering a seamless and effective therapeutic experience.

2.1. Core Computing Devices

The primary platforms for delivering NIVR experiences are conventional computing devices, chosen for their widespread availability and sufficient processing capabilities to render and execute virtual environments without requiring dedicated graphics processing units (GPUs) typically found in high-end gaming PCs. These devices include:

• Personal Computers (PCs) and Laptops: These offer the most flexibility in terms of processing power, screen size, and connectivity options. They can host complex NIVR applications, support external peripherals like advanced motion-tracking cameras, and facilitate data storage and analysis. Their larger screens often provide a more expansive view of the virtual environment.
• Tablets: Offering a balance of portability and screen real estate, tablets are ideal for bedside use, home therapy, and situations where a smaller, self-contained unit is beneficial. Their touch-screen interfaces enable intuitive interaction, and their integrated sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes) can be leveraged for basic motion tracking.
• Smartphones: As the most ubiquitous computing device, smartphones provide unparalleled accessibility. While their smaller screens might offer a less expansive view, their portability makes them excellent for ‘on-the-go’ interventions, quick therapeutic sessions, or home-based exercises. Modern smartphones possess considerable processing power and integrated sensors suitable for many NIVR applications.

These devices operate on standard operating systems such as Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, enabling developers to create cross-platform applications that maximize reach and compatibility.

2.2. Software Architectures and Development Frameworks

The robustness and therapeutic efficacy of NIVR applications are heavily dependent on their underlying software architectures. Key software platforms and development kits are instrumental in creating and delivering NIVR content:

• Game Engines (Unity and Unreal Engine): These powerful development environments are frequently employed to design and implement NIVR applications due to their versatility, extensive libraries of assets, sophisticated physics engines, and cross-platform compilation capabilities. Unity, in particular, is a popular choice for medical applications due to its comprehensive documentation and a large developer community. These engines allow for the creation of rich 3D environments, complex interactive elements, and realistic simulations, all rendered in real-time on standard displays.
• Software Development Kits (SDKs) for Body Tracking: For applications requiring movement analysis and physical interaction, specialized SDKs are integrated. The Nuitrack SDK, for instance, combined with depth cameras like the Intel RealSense D435i or Azure Kinect, enables highly accurate, real-time skeletal tracking. This capability allows the system to recognize and interpret human body movements without the need for wearable sensors. Other open-source alternatives like OpenPose or MediaPipe also offer markerless pose estimation, facilitating interactive rehabilitation exercises where a user’s movements directly control an avatar or interact with virtual objects.
• Cloud-Based Platforms and Data Analytics: Many modern NIVR solutions incorporate cloud computing for content delivery, secure data storage, and advanced analytics. This allows for personalized adaptive experiences, remote monitoring of patient progress, and data-driven insights into intervention efficacy. Cloud integration also facilitates seamless updates and maintenance of the software.

2.3. User Interaction Devices and Input Methods

The method by which users interact with NIVR environments is critical for engagement, accessibility, and therapeutic effectiveness. The choice of input device is often tailored to the specific application and the user’s cognitive and physical capabilities:

• Standard Input Devices: Keyboards and mice provide precise control for navigation and interaction within virtual environments, particularly for applications requiring fine motor skills or text input.
• Touchscreens: Prevalent on tablets and smartphones, touchscreens offer an intuitive and direct manipulation interface. Users can tap, swipe, and pinch to interact with virtual objects, making them highly accessible for a wide range of users, including those with limited mobility in their hands.
• Motion-Tracking Systems (Camera-Based): As mentioned, depth cameras and associated SDKs enable markerless motion tracking. This means users do not need to wear any sensors; their natural body movements are captured by the camera and translated into virtual actions. This is particularly beneficial for rehabilitation, allowing for natural execution of exercises without cumbersome equipment. Examples include virtual mirrors for posture correction or interactive games controlled by limb movements.
• Voice Recognition: Integrating voice commands offers an additional layer of accessibility, allowing users with motor impairments to navigate or interact with the environment verbally.
• Specialized Controllers: While less common than in IVR, some NIVR systems might utilize simplified game controllers or custom-designed input devices tailored for specific therapeutic tasks, offering tactile feedback or simplified button layouts.
• Biofeedback Sensors: For advanced applications, NIVR systems can integrate biofeedback sensors (e.g., heart rate variability, galvanic skin response) to monitor physiological responses. This data can be used to adapt the virtual environment in real-time (e.g., calming visuals for high anxiety) or provide users with immediate feedback on their physiological state, enhancing mindfulness or relaxation therapies.

2.4. Content Creation Pipeline

The development of compelling NIVR content involves a multi-disciplinary pipeline. This includes 3D modeling for virtual environments and objects, character animation, scripting for interactive logic, sound design for auditory feedback, and user interface (UI) design for intuitive navigation. Content developers work closely with healthcare professionals to ensure that the virtual experiences are not only engaging but also clinically relevant and therapeutically beneficial.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Diverse Applications of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality in Healthcare

NIVR’s versatility has led to its successful application across an expanding array of healthcare domains, demonstrating significant promise as both a primary and adjunctive therapeutic modality.

3.1. Rehabilitation: Restoring Function and Enhancing Recovery

NIVR has shown profound promise in rehabilitating patients with a variety of neurological and orthopedic conditions, leveraging principles of neuroplasticity, motor learning, and patient engagement.

3.1.1. Neurological Rehabilitation

• Stroke Rehabilitation: Post-stroke deficits often include impaired upper and lower limb function, balance issues, and cognitive impairments. NIVR applications provide engaging platforms for repetitive, task-specific training. A pilot study highlighted high usability and movement accuracy in stroke patients using NIVR exercises for upper limb rehabilitation, indicating potential for enhancing motor skills and cognitive functions. This approach leverages gamification to motivate patients to perform repetitive movements that are crucial for motor relearning and neuroplasticity (mdpi.com). NIVR can offer diverse virtual environments that mimic real-world scenarios, promoting transfer of learned skills.
• Parkinson’s Disease (PD): Individuals with PD often suffer from balance instability, gait disturbances, and increased risk of falls. Systematic reviews encompassing multiple studies have consistently found that NIVR interventions lead to significant improvements in both static and dynamic balance among patients with Parkinson’s disease (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Exercises often involve interactive balance games, virtual obstacle courses, or stepping tasks, providing immediate feedback on performance and encouraging corrective movements. Furthermore, NIVR has been explored for cognitive benefits in PD, with comparative studies examining its effects on anxiety and cognition (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Multiple Sclerosis (MS): NIVR can address symptoms such as gait ataxia, balance deficits, and cognitive fatigue in MS patients. Interactive exercises focusing on coordination, reaction time, and balance can be tailored to individual needs, allowing for progression at a comfortable pace.
• Cerebral Palsy (CP): For pediatric patients with CP, NIVR offers playful yet therapeutically robust environments to practice gross and fine motor skills, improve range of motion, and enhance motor control. The engaging nature of NIVR games often improves adherence in a population that might find traditional therapy monotonous.

3.1.2. Orthopedic Rehabilitation

• Post-Surgical Recovery: Patients recovering from orthopedic surgeries (e.g., total knee arthroplasty, hip replacement, rotator cuff repair) require consistent exercise to restore range of motion and strength. NIVR applications can provide structured exercise protocols, guiding patients through movements, tracking their performance, and providing visual feedback. This can be particularly useful for home-based therapy, reducing the need for frequent clinic visits.
• Injury Recovery: For sprains, strains, and fractures, NIVR can facilitate active rehabilitation, encouraging movement within pain-free limits. Biofeedback mechanisms within NIVR can ensure patients are performing exercises correctly, minimizing the risk of re-injury.

3.1.3. Cardiac Rehabilitation

NIVR has demonstrated significant utility in cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that NIVR active video games, when incorporated into cardiac rehabilitation, significantly improved aerobic capacity and cardiovascular endurance compared to conventional methods. Crucially, these NIVR interventions were also associated with reduced anxiety levels among participants, highlighting the psychological benefits of engaging digital therapies (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). These programs often involve virtual cycling, running, or interactive movement-based games that progressively challenge the cardiovascular system while keeping patients engaged and motivated.

3.2. Pain Management: A Non-Pharmacological Adjunct

NIVR has emerged as a compelling non-pharmacological intervention for both acute and chronic pain management, primarily through mechanisms of cognitive distraction, relaxation induction, and altered pain perception.

3.2.1. Acute Procedural Pain

• Pediatric Oncology: In pediatric oncology, NIVR applications have proven highly effective in reducing pain and anxiety during distressing medical procedures such as venipuncture, chemotherapy infusions, or wound care. By immersing patients in engaging virtual environments, such as interactive games or calming nature scenes, NIVR serves as a powerful cognitive distraction, thereby mitigating the perception of pain and anxiety. This distraction mechanism operates by diverting attentional resources away from nociceptive stimuli and towards the engaging virtual world (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Other Medical Procedures: NIVR can be similarly applied during dental procedures, vaccinations, or minor wound dressings, offering a non-invasive way to improve patient comfort and cooperation.

3.2.2. Chronic Pain Management

• Fibromyalgia, Neuropathic Pain, Low Back Pain: For individuals suffering from chronic pain conditions, NIVR can offer a safe, controlled environment to practice pain coping strategies. Virtual relaxation scenes, guided mindfulness exercises, or simple interactive games can help reduce the cognitive rumination often associated with chronic pain. The distraction provided by NIVR can interrupt the pain-anxiety cycle, leading to a temporary reduction in perceived pain intensity and improving pain tolerance. Some applications focus on teaching pain self-management techniques in a gamified format.

3.3. Cognitive Therapy: Enhancing Brain Function and Mental Well-being

NIVR has been extensively employed in cognitive therapy, particularly for patients with diverse cognitive impairments and mental health conditions. Its interactive nature makes it an ideal platform for cognitive training and behavioral interventions.

3.3.1. Cognitive Remediation

• Stroke Patients: Beyond motor rehabilitation, NIVR can target specific cognitive deficits post-stroke, such as attention, memory, executive functions, and spatial neglect. Applications might involve virtual shopping tasks to improve planning, memory games, or reaction-time challenges to enhance attention.
• Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): NIVR offers structured cognitive stimulation activities designed to engage various cognitive domains. Reminiscence therapy, for example, can be facilitated by presenting familiar historical scenes or objects, stimulating memory recall and conversation. Virtual puzzles, navigation tasks, or pattern recognition games can help maintain cognitive function and delay decline. The engaging nature of NIVR can reduce apathy and increase participation in cognitive exercises.
• Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): NIVR environments can be designed to train sustained attention, selective attention, and executive functions like impulse control and planning. Gamified tasks require focus and strategic thinking, providing a structured yet engaging way to practice these skills.
• Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): For individuals recovering from TBI, NIVR can assist in rehabilitation of cognitive functions, including problem-solving, decision-making, and memory, in a progressive and adaptive manner.

3.3.2. Mental Health and Behavioral Interventions

• Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: While IVR is often preferred for exposure therapy, NIVR can still be effective for desensitization in milder cases or as a preparatory step. Users can be gradually exposed to anxiety-provoking stimuli (e.g., virtual public speaking scenarios, virtual heights) in a controlled, less immersive environment, allowing them to practice coping mechanisms. Relaxation and mindfulness applications in NIVR, featuring calming virtual environments and guided meditations, are also highly effective for generalized anxiety and stress reduction.
• Depression: NIVR can combat social isolation and anhedonia by offering engaging, positive virtual experiences that promote behavioral activation. Interactive games, virtual social scenarios, or even virtual pet care can provide a sense of achievement and connection, helping to alleviate symptoms of depression.
• Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): NIVR can provide a safe and controlled environment for social skills training, emotional recognition practice, and reducing sensory sensitivities. Virtual scenarios can simulate social interactions, allowing individuals with ASD to practice conversational turns, interpret facial expressions, and navigate complex social cues without the pressures of real-world interactions.

3.4. Medical Education and Training

Beyond direct patient care, NIVR also holds significant potential in medical education. It can be used for patient education, helping individuals understand complex medical conditions, procedures, or medication regimens through interactive visual explanations. For medical students and healthcare professionals, NIVR can offer simplified simulations of anatomical structures, physiological processes, or even basic procedural steps, serving as a valuable supplementary learning tool without requiring expensive, high-fidelity simulators.

3.5. Wellness and Prevention

NIVR can promote general health and well-being. This includes virtual exercise programs for fitness, stress reduction applications with guided meditation and calming environments, and educational modules on healthy lifestyle choices. Its accessibility makes it an ideal tool for large-scale public health initiatives.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Efficacy and User Adoption: A Dual Perspective

The ultimate success and widespread integration of NIVR interventions in healthcare hinge on two critical factors: demonstrable efficacy through rigorous clinical validation and high rates of user adoption. While research is ongoing, significant insights have been gained into both aspects.

4.1. Measuring Efficacy: Clinical Outcomes and Methodological Rigor

The efficacy of NIVR interventions is typically assessed through a variety of quantitative and qualitative metrics, often within the framework of robust clinical trial designs such as Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews with meta-analyses.

4.1.1. Quantitative Metrics

• Physical Function: For rehabilitation, efficacy is measured by improvements in standardized physical assessment scales. This includes validated tools for balance (e.g., Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test), gait parameters (e.g., stride length, velocity), upper and lower limb motor function (e.g., Fugl-Meyer Assessment), and aerobic capacity (e.g., 6-minute walk test). Studies on cardiac rehabilitation, for instance, specifically noted improved aerobic capacity and cardiovascular endurance with NIVR intervention (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Pain Levels: For pain management, efficacy is often assessed using subjective pain scales (e.g., Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Rating Scale) and objective measures of analgesic consumption. The reported reduction in pain and anxiety during pediatric oncology procedures underscores NIVR’s efficacy in this domain (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Cognitive Performance: In cognitive therapy, standardized neuropsychological tests are used to measure changes in specific cognitive domains such as memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed.
• Psychological Well-being: Standardized questionnaires assess levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and overall quality of life. The observed reduction in anxiety among cardiac rehabilitation participants is a prime example of such a psychological benefit (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Adherence and Engagement: Metrics such as session completion rates, duration of engagement, and frequency of use provide insights into patient compliance and interest in the intervention.

4.1.2. Qualitative Feedback and Study Designs

Qualitative data, gathered through patient interviews and feedback surveys, provides crucial insights into perceived benefits, user experience, and areas for improvement. While some studies report significant improvements across various domains, others highlight the need for further research to establish long-term benefits, optimal intervention protocols (e.g., dosage, frequency, duration), and the generalizability of findings across diverse patient populations. Methodological rigor, including blinding (where possible), appropriate control groups, and sufficient sample sizes, is essential for generating high-quality evidence.

4.2. User Adoption and Engagement: Facilitators and Barriers

User adoption of NIVR is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, encompassing technological, psychological, and social dimensions. Understanding these factors is key to successful implementation.

4.2.1. Facilitators of Adoption

• Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness: The fundamental advantage of NIVR lies in its low barrier to entry. Its reliance on widely available and affordable devices (PCs, tablets, smartphones) makes it significantly more accessible than IVR, particularly in low-resource settings or for home-based therapy. This financial accessibility is a major driver for adoption.
• Ease of Use and Setup: NIVR systems typically require minimal setup, often involving simply launching an application. The intuitive interfaces (e.g., touchscreens, standard input) reduce the learning curve, making them approachable for users with varying levels of technological literacy, including older adults. Studies have indicated that older adults find NIVR exercises enjoyable and motivating, leading to increased physical activity levels and sustained engagement (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
• Perceived Effectiveness and Benefits: When users experience tangible improvements in their condition or perceive the intervention as beneficial (e.g., reduced pain, improved mobility), their motivation to adopt and adhere to NIVR programs significantly increases. Positive word-of-mouth and testimonials play a crucial role.
• Engagement and Motivation (Gamification): The inherent gamified nature of many NIVR applications makes therapeutic exercises more enjoyable and less tedious. Features like points, levels, leaderboards, and immediate feedback on performance transform monotonous repetitions into engaging challenges, fostering greater adherence and intrinsic motivation. This ‘fun factor’ is particularly powerful for pediatric patients and older adults.
• Reduced Discomfort: Unlike some IVR experiences, NIVR typically does not induce motion sickness, disorientation, or eye strain, making it a more comfortable option for prolonged use or for sensitive individuals.

4.2.2. Barriers to Adoption

• Digital Divide and Technological Literacy: Despite increasing access to technology, a significant portion of the population, particularly older adults or those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, may lack the necessary technological literacy or access to reliable internet connectivity. This ‘digital divide’ can hinder adoption.
• Lack of Personalization: Generic NIVR content may not adequately address the highly specific and evolving needs of individual patients. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach can lead to disengagement.
• Skepticism from Healthcare Providers: Some clinicians may be hesitant to adopt NIVR due to a lack of familiarity, insufficient evidence (in their view), or concerns about integration into existing workflows.
• Physical Limitations: While NIVR aims for accessibility, certain physical impairments (e.g., severe tremors impacting touchscreen use, visual impairments) can still pose challenges for some input methods.
• Data Security and Privacy Concerns: Patients and institutions may have legitimate concerns regarding the privacy and security of sensitive health data collected by NIVR applications.

Addressing these barriers requires a multi-faceted approach, encompassing accessible design, patient education, professional training, and robust data governance policies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges and Best Practices for NIVR Development and Implementation

Developing, deploying, and integrating effective NIVR content into mainstream healthcare practice presents a unique set of challenges that necessitate a strategic and collaborative approach. Overcoming these hurdles requires careful consideration of technical, clinical, and ethical dimensions.

5.1. Technical Challenges

• Performance Optimization: While NIVR relies on standard devices, ensuring smooth performance, low latency, and acceptable graphical fidelity across a wide range of hardware configurations can be challenging. Developers must optimize applications to run efficiently on devices with varying processing power and memory.
• Hardware Compatibility and Fragmentation: The diverse ecosystem of computing devices (various manufacturers, operating systems, screen sizes, input methods) creates a fragmentation challenge. Ensuring broad compatibility and consistent user experience across different devices requires significant development effort and rigorous testing.
• Data Security and Privacy: NIVR applications often collect sensitive patient data, including health metrics, performance data, and personal identifiers. Adhering to stringent data protection regulations such as HIPAA in the US or GDPR in Europe is paramount. This necessitates robust encryption, secure data storage, strict access controls, and transparent privacy policies.
• Connectivity and Bandwidth: For cloud-based NIVR solutions or those requiring remote monitoring, stable internet connectivity is crucial. In areas with limited bandwidth or unreliable connections, offline capabilities or optimized data transfer protocols are essential.

5.2. Content Development Challenges

• Tailoring Content to Varying Abilities: A major challenge lies in designing NIVR applications that genuinely accommodate a wide spectrum of cognitive and physical abilities. This requires:
  • Adjustable Difficulty Levels: Content must be scalable, starting from basic exercises and progressively increasing in complexity as the user improves. This adaptation should ideally be dynamic and algorithm-driven.
  • Customizable Interfaces: Options for larger text, simplified visual layouts, alternative input methods (e.g., voice, single-button presses), and color contrast adjustments enhance accessibility for users with sensory or motor impairments.
  • Clear and Concise Instructions: Instructions should be unambiguous, multi-modal (visual, auditory, textual), and provided at a pace suitable for the user’s cognitive processing speed.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Content should be culturally appropriate and avoid stereotypes, ensuring broad appeal and acceptance.
• Maintaining Engagement and Adherence: While gamification is powerful, sustaining long-term engagement requires more than just points and badges. Challenges include:
  • Novelty Fatigue: Users may lose interest once the initial novelty wears off.
  • Relevance and Progression: Content must remain therapeutically relevant and provide a clear path for progression.
  • Feedback Loops: Providing meaningful, actionable feedback on performance is crucial for learning and motivation.
• Clinical Validation and Evidence Generation: Developing clinically effective NIVR content necessitates close collaboration with healthcare professionals and researchers. The process involves:
  • Evidence-Based Design: Ensuring that the therapeutic principles embedded in the NIVR application are aligned with established clinical guidelines and research findings.
  • Rigorous Clinical Trials: Conducting well-designed studies to demonstrate efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in diverse patient populations.
  • Ethical Considerations: Obtaining informed consent, ensuring patient autonomy, and addressing potential psychological impacts of virtual environments.

5.3. Implementation Challenges

• Integration with Clinical Workflows: Seamless integration of NIVR into existing healthcare delivery models and Electronic Health Records (EHR) is critical for widespread adoption. This includes developing interoperability standards and user-friendly interfaces for clinicians.
• Training for Healthcare Professionals: Clinicians and therapists require adequate training on how to use NIVR systems, integrate them into treatment plans, interpret data, and troubleshoot common issues. Lack of training can be a significant barrier to adoption.
• Reimbursement Models: Establishing clear and consistent reimbursement pathways for NIVR therapies is essential for their financial sustainability and widespread adoption by healthcare providers and insurers.
• Scalability: Deploying NIVR solutions across diverse healthcare settings—from large hospitals to rural clinics and individual homes—requires robust infrastructure, technical support, and scalable content delivery mechanisms.

5.4. Best Practices for Development and Deployment

To overcome these challenges and maximize the impact of NIVR in healthcare, several best practices should be adhered to:

• User-Centred Design (UCD): Involve end-users (patients, caregivers, clinicians) throughout the entire development lifecycle, from conceptualization to testing and refinement. This iterative process ensures the application meets real-world needs and preferences.
• Evidence-Based Practice: Ground NIVR content in strong scientific evidence and clinical guidelines. Collaborate with academic institutions and research bodies to conduct rigorous clinical trials and publish findings.
• Prioritize Accessibility: Design NIVR applications with universal design principles in mind, offering multiple input modalities, adjustable settings, and clear visual and auditory cues to accommodate diverse abilities.
• Robust Security and Privacy: Implement industry-leading encryption, data anonymization, and access control measures. Ensure compliance with all relevant health data privacy regulations.
• Iterative Development and Continuous Improvement: Deploy Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) for early feedback, and continuously refine and update the application based on user data, clinical outcomes, and emerging research.
• Comprehensive Training and Support: Provide extensive training materials, technical support, and clinical guidance for both patients and healthcare providers to ensure confident and effective use of the NIVR system.
• Interoperability Standards: Work towards common data standards (e.g., FHIR) to enable seamless integration with EHRs and other digital health platforms.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Future Directions and Conclusion

Non-Immersive Virtual Reality stands at the cusp of a significant expansion within healthcare, poised to become an indispensable tool in clinical practice and home-based care. Its inherent accessibility and versatility position it as a critical component in the ongoing digital transformation of health services.

6.1. Emerging Trends and Future Opportunities

• Integration with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML): Future NIVR systems will increasingly leverage AI/ML for adaptive content generation, personalized intervention delivery, and predictive analytics. AI can analyze user performance in real-time to adjust difficulty levels, provide personalized feedback, and even identify subtle patterns indicative of health changes, leading to highly customized and responsive therapeutic experiences.
• Enhanced Telehealth and Telerehabilitation Capabilities: NIVR is perfectly suited for remote healthcare delivery, facilitating telerehabilitation, virtual consultations, and remote patient monitoring. This will expand access to specialized care, reduce geographical barriers, and enhance continuity of care, particularly for chronic conditions or post-discharge recovery. The concept of ‘Virtual Reality in Telerehabilitation’ is rapidly gaining traction (Wikipedia – Virtual Reality in Telerehabilitation).
• Hybrid Models of Care: The future will likely see more hybrid models, combining NIVR interventions with traditional in-person therapies. This ‘blended care’ approach maximizes the benefits of both modalities, offering flexibility and optimized outcomes.
• Standardization and Regulation: As NIVR matures, there will be an increasing need for industry standards regarding content quality, technical specifications, and clinical validation. Regulatory bodies will likely develop specific guidelines for digital therapeutics incorporating NIVR, ensuring safety and efficacy.
• Broader Commercialization and Integration: With growing evidence of efficacy and improved reimbursement models, NIVR solutions are expected to become more widely adopted by healthcare systems, insurance providers, and direct-to-consumer markets, making these transformative therapies more readily available to the general public.
• Preventive and Wellness Applications: Beyond therapy, NIVR will see expanded use in preventive healthcare and general wellness, promoting healthy lifestyles, stress reduction, and cognitive fitness across all age groups.

6.2. Conclusion

Non-Immersive Virtual Reality represents a profoundly promising avenue in modern healthcare. Its accessible and effective interventions span diverse medical domains, including complex rehabilitation, nuanced pain management, and sophisticated cognitive therapies. This underscores its remarkable versatility and substantial potential to augment or even revolutionize traditional care models. However, to fully realize the transformative benefits of NIVR, continuous and collaborative efforts are imperative. Ongoing research is vital to refine intervention protocols, firmly establish long-term efficacy through robust longitudinal studies, and meticulously develop and validate content that not only caters to the diverse and evolving needs of patients but also integrates seamlessly into existing healthcare infrastructures. By addressing these critical areas, NIVR can truly fulfill its promise as a cornerstone of accessible, engaging, and effective digital healthcare in the 21st century.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Cortés-Pérez, I., Sánchez-Alcalá, M., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., Castellote-Caballero, Y., Obrero-Gaitán, E., & Osuna-Pérez, M. C. (2021). Non-Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Therapy Applied in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sensors (Basel), 21(21), 7389. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38339621/
• Cortés-Pérez, I., Sánchez-Alcalá, M., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., Castellote-Caballero, Y., Obrero-Gaitán, E., & Osuna-Pérez, M. C. (2023). Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Can Increase Exercise in Older Adults Living in the Community and in Long-Term Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(8), 2467. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39931102/
• Cortés-Pérez, I., Sánchez-Alcalá, M., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., Castellote-Caballero, Y., Obrero-Gaitán, E., & Osuna-Pérez, M. C. (2024). Effects of Immersive and Non-Immersive Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease: A Comparative Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 123. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40325689/
• García-López, H., Obrero-Gaitán, E., Castro-Sánchez, A. M., Lara-Palomo, I. C., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., & Cortés-Pérez, I. (2021). Exercises Based on a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Upper Limb Rehabilitation. Biomedicines, 12(7), 726. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/7/726
• García-López, H., Obrero-Gaitán, E., Castro-Sánchez, A. M., Lara-Palomo, I. C., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., & Cortés-Pérez, I. (2021). Immersive and Non-Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety Management in Pediatric Patients with Hematological or Solid Cancer: A Systematic Review. Children, 8(11), 1012. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9913167/
• García-López, H., Obrero-Gaitán, E., Castro-Sánchez, A. M., Lara-Palomo, I. C., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., & Cortés-Pérez, I. (2021). Non-Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Balance and Reduce Risk of Falls in People Diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences, 11(11), 1435. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8615507/
• Mugisha, S., Job, M., Zoppi, M., Testa, M., & Molfino, R. (2024). Computer-Mediated Therapies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 15, 1234. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20260
• National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). (n.d.). An Overview of Clinical Applications of Virtual and Augmented Reality. In NCBI Bookshelf. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK596298/
• csbranch.com. (2024, November 24). Types of VR: Immersive vs. Non-Immersive. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://csbranch.com/index.php/2024/11/24/types-of-vr-immersive-vs-non-immersive/
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Virtual Reality Applications. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality_applications
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Virtual Reality in Telerehabilitation. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality_in_telerehabilitation
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Virtual Reality Therapy. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality_therapy