The Environmental Footprint of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Towards a Sustainable Future

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a profoundly transformative force in healthcare, offering unparalleled advancements in diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment paradigms, operational streamlining, and the overarching improvement of patient outcomes. However, the pervasive integration and escalating sophistication of AI technologies are intrinsically linked to significant environmental implications. This detailed report critically examines the multifaceted environmental footprint of AI in the healthcare sector, focusing on key areas such as substantial energy consumption, associated carbon emissions, considerable electronic waste generation, and escalating water usage for computational infrastructure. It proposes a comprehensive suite of strategies designed to foster environmental stewardship, including the development and deployment of energy-efficient algorithms, optimization of underlying hardware infrastructure, implementation of robust sustainable data management practices, aggressive adoption of renewable energy sources, and the integration of circular economy principles. Furthermore, the report delves into essential policy and regulatory frameworks necessary to cultivate a sustainable trajectory for AI in healthcare, ensuring that its powerful advancements contribute positively and enduringly to both human health and the indispensable well-being of our planet.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction: The Dual Mandate of AI in Healthcare

The advent and rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the fabric of healthcare have ushered in an era of unprecedented innovation and potential. From sophisticated diagnostic imaging analysis and the creation of highly personalized treatment plans to the automation of administrative tasks and the predictive analytics that anticipate disease outbreaks, AI applications are fundamentally reshaping how medical care is delivered and researched globally. This technological revolution promises to alleviate burdens on healthcare systems, enhance the precision of medical interventions, accelerate drug discovery, and ultimately improve the quality and accessibility of patient care across diverse populations [1, 2]. The capacity of AI to process vast, complex datasets at speeds and scales far beyond human capabilities has positioned it as an indispensable tool in modern medicine.

Despite these profound and undeniable benefits, the burgeoning proliferation and increasing complexity of AI technologies have concurrently cast a spotlight on their significant and often overlooked environmental footprint. The ethical framework surrounding AI has largely focused on issues of bias, fairness, privacy, and accountability [3]. However, an equally critical, though less explored, dimension pertains to the ecological costs associated with the computational demands of AI. The substantial energy consumption required for the training, validation, and deployment of complex AI models, particularly deep learning architectures, translates directly into considerable greenhouse gas emissions. This challenge is compounded by the rapid lifecycle and disposal of specialized hardware, contributing to a growing global electronic waste crisis, and the intensive water demands of cooling large-scale data centers [4, 5].

The healthcare sector itself, recognized for its substantial carbon footprint globally, has a unique imperative to pursue sustainable practices. As healthcare increasingly relies on AI, it becomes paramount to reconcile the transformative potential of these technologies with the urgent need for environmental sustainability. Failing to address these ecological implications risks undermining the very goal of improving human health, as climate change and environmental degradation pose significant threats to global public health [6].

This report embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the environmental impact of AI within the healthcare domain. It aims to dissect the principal components of this footprint, offering an in-depth analysis of energy consumption, carbon emissions, electronic waste, and water usage. Critically, it will then propose actionable strategies and policy considerations aimed at mitigating these adverse effects. The overarching objective is to advocate for a ‘Sustainable AI’ or ‘Green AI’ paradigm in healthcare, where technological progress is harmonized with ecological responsibility, ensuring that AI advancements contribute positively to both human well-being and planetary health for generations to come.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. The Multifaceted Environmental Footprint of AI in Healthcare

The environmental impact of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare is not a singular phenomenon but rather a complex interplay of various factors stemming from the entire lifecycle of AI systems, from their conception and development to their deployment and eventual obsolescence. Understanding these facets is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies.

2.1 Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: The Invisible Cost of Computation

The computational demands of modern AI, particularly those employing deep learning techniques, are astronomically high. Training sophisticated AI models, especially large language models (LLMs) and complex neural networks used in image recognition or genomic analysis, requires immense processing power over extended periods. This translates directly into substantial electricity consumption, primarily due to the intense operations of Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and other specialized accelerators like Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) [7].

2.1.1 The Computational Landscape

• Training vs. Inference: The most energy-intensive phase is typically model training, where algorithms learn from vast datasets. This process often involves billions or trillions of calculations and iterations. For instance, training a large transformer model like BERT has been estimated to consume as much energy as a car’s entire lifecycle, including manufacturing [8]. More recent models like GPT-3 or even larger proprietary models have an exponentially higher energy footprint for their training phase, often leveraging thousands of GPUs over weeks or months. Inference, the process of using a trained model to make predictions or decisions, is generally less energy-intensive per query but can accumulate significant energy consumption when deployed at scale, such as in real-time diagnostic systems or virtual health assistants that process millions of requests daily.
• Model Complexity and Hyperparameter Tuning: The relentless pursuit of higher accuracy and performance often leads to the development of increasingly complex models with more layers, parameters, and sophisticated architectures. Each increase in complexity typically demands more computational resources. Furthermore, the iterative process of hyperparameter tuning, where multiple model versions are trained and evaluated to find optimal configurations, multiplies the energy cost. Researchers may run dozens or hundreds of experiments, each consuming significant power, before settling on a final model.
• Data Volume in Healthcare: Healthcare generates an astonishing amount of data. Billions of medical images (X-rays, MRIs, CT scans), electronic health records (EHRs), genomic sequences, and sensor data from wearables are generated annually. Storing, transmitting, and processing this ‘big data’ for AI training and deployment contributes significantly to the overall energy footprint [9]. The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) has highlighted this, noting that AI models consume vast amounts of energy and generate enormous training datasets, which healthcare institutions must store alongside the billions of medical images produced annually [10].

2.1.2 Data Center Infrastructure

The majority of AI model training and deployment occurs in data centers, which are the backbone of modern digital infrastructure. These facilities are massive consumers of electricity, not just for powering servers but also for crucial cooling systems. The efficiency of a data center is often measured by its Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) ratio, where a PUE of 1.0 indicates perfect efficiency (all power goes to computing equipment). While modern data centers are striving for lower PUEs (e.g., 1.1-1.2), significant energy is still expended on non-computational tasks like cooling, power distribution, and lighting [11].

• Cooling Systems: Servers generate substantial heat, requiring sophisticated cooling mechanisms. These can range from traditional air conditioning to more advanced liquid cooling systems, all of which consume considerable amounts of electricity. The choice of cooling technology can have a direct impact on the data center’s energy and water footprint.
• Energy Sources: A critical factor determining the carbon emissions associated with AI is the energy mix of the grid powering these data centers. If data centers primarily draw electricity from grids dominated by fossil fuels (coal, natural gas), the carbon footprint of AI operations will be substantial. Even with advancements in renewable energy adoption, many regions still rely heavily on non-renewable sources, contributing to increased greenhouse gas emissions [12]. The transition to renewable energy sources is paramount for decarbonizing AI.

Quantifying the exact carbon footprint of a specific AI model or healthcare application is challenging due to the variability in hardware, data center efficiency, and grid energy mix. However, estimates for training large-scale models range from hundreds to thousands of kilograms of CO2 equivalent, comparable to transatlantic flights or the annual emissions of several cars [8]. This ‘invisible cost’ of computation demands greater transparency and accountability.

2.2 Electronic Waste (E-waste): The Digital Aftermath

The relentless pace of technological advancement, particularly in the AI hardware sector, inevitably leads to a significant increase in electronic waste (e-waste). AI computation is highly dependent on specialized hardware like high-performance GPUs, custom ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), and TPUs. The rapid generational improvements in these components often render older hardware obsolete long before its mechanical end-of-life, driven by the demand for higher processing power and efficiency [13].

2.2.1 The Lifecycle of Hardware and Obsolescence

• Manufacturing Impact: The production of AI hardware is resource-intensive, requiring significant amounts of energy, water, and various raw materials, including rare earth metals, precious metals (gold, silver), and hazardous substances (lead, mercury, cadmium). Mining these materials often has severe environmental and social impacts, including habitat destruction, pollution, and unethical labor practices.
• Rapid Obsolescence: The ‘AI race’ incentivizes frequent hardware upgrades. New chip architectures, increased core counts, and improved memory bandwidth can offer significant performance gains (e.g., 2x or more per generation). This often means that hardware purchased even a few years ago is deemed insufficient for cutting-edge AI research or large-scale model deployment. This rapid turnover directly contributes to the accumulation of e-waste.
• Healthcare-Specific E-waste: Beyond data center hardware, AI integration in healthcare also involves specialized medical devices embedded with AI capabilities, smart diagnostic tools, and new IT infrastructure within hospitals. The lifespan of these devices, too, contributes to the e-waste problem. For instance, advanced medical imaging equipment, while not solely AI-driven, is becoming increasingly integrated with AI components that may require separate upgrades or replacements.

2.2.2 Risks of Improper E-waste Management

E-waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally. Improper disposal, particularly in informal recycling sectors in developing countries, poses severe environmental and health risks:

• Hazardous Materials: Many electronic components contain toxic chemicals that can leach into soil and water, contaminating ecosystems and entering the food chain. Lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and brominated flame retardants are common examples, posing risks of neurological damage, kidney disease, cancer, and developmental disorders [14].
• Resource Depletion: E-waste represents a significant loss of valuable resources that could otherwise be recovered and reused. Recycling rates for e-waste remain low globally, meaning that vast amounts of potentially reusable materials are lost to landfills.
• Energy Intensity of New Production: Each new piece of hardware manufactured from virgin materials carries a substantial embodied energy cost. Maximizing the lifespan of existing hardware and facilitating responsible recycling reduces the demand for new production, thereby mitigating manufacturing-related energy consumption and pollution. The Journal of Education and Health Promotion discusses the potential of sustainable materials in AI technology to improve patient-centric healthcare solutions by reducing energy consumption and limiting environmental impact, advocating for a shift towards circularity [5].

2.3 Water Usage: The Thirst of Data Centers

Data centers, critical infrastructure for AI operations, are not only prodigious consumers of electricity but also significant users of freshwater, primarily for cooling their equipment. This often overlooked environmental impact can have profound local and regional consequences, particularly in water-stressed areas [15].

2.3.1 Cooling Technologies and Water Demand

• Evaporative Cooling: Many large data centers employ evaporative cooling systems, which use water to dissipate heat from servers. While highly energy-efficient in terms of electricity, these systems consume vast quantities of water through evaporation. For instance, a medium-sized data center can evaporate millions of liters of water annually, comparable to the water usage of tens of thousands of homes.
• Chiller Systems: Other data centers use chiller systems that circulate chilled water through heat exchangers. While some systems are closed-loop, others require a constant supply of freshwater for make-up water or discharge, especially for ‘once-through’ cooling or to replace evaporated water from cooling towers.
• Water Scarcity and Local Impact: The demand for water by data centers can strain local freshwater resources, especially in regions already facing water scarcity. This can lead to competition for water between data centers, agriculture, industry, and residential needs, potentially exacerbating social and economic tensions. The environmental and societal consequences of AI data centers’ water consumption are significant, affecting both local communities and global water resources [15].
• Water Footprint Concept: The ‘water footprint’ of a product or process accounts for both direct and indirect water use. For AI, this includes the water used for manufacturing hardware, generating electricity for operations (especially from thermoelectric power plants), and directly cooling data centers. A comprehensive understanding requires assessing the blue (surface/groundwater), green (rainwater), and grey (polluted water) water components [16].

Major cloud providers have acknowledged their substantial water usage. For example, reports have indicated that large tech companies operate data centers that collectively consume billions of liters of water annually, equivalent to the water consumption of small cities [17]. As AI continues to expand, so too will the demand for computational infrastructure, placing increased pressure on water resources if sustainable cooling practices are not widely adopted.

2.4 Data Storage and Transmission: The Energy of Persistent Information

The sheer volume of data generated and utilized by AI in healthcare also carries an often-underestimated environmental cost related to storage and transmission.

• Data Storage: Medical imaging, electronic health records (EHRs), genomic data, and sensor data require vast storage capacities. While ‘cold storage’ (for infrequently accessed data) is generally less energy-intensive than ‘hot storage’ (for frequently accessed data), the cumulative energy required to power storage infrastructure, including hard drives, solid-state drives (SSDs), and tape libraries, is substantial. This includes not only the energy for the devices themselves but also for the cooling and power supply of the storage arrays [9]. The necessity of retaining historical patient data for regulatory compliance, longitudinal studies, and future AI training further exacerbates this issue.
• Data Transmission: Moving large datasets between healthcare facilities, research institutions, and cloud-based AI services consumes significant energy. Data travels across local networks, national fiber optic lines, and undersea cables, each hop requiring energy from routers, switches, and other network infrastructure. As AI models become more distributed (e.g., federated learning) or as remote access to AI diagnostics increases, the energy cost of data transmission will grow [18]. The burgeoning trend of telehealth and remote patient monitoring, while offering accessibility benefits, also increases data transmission needs.

2.5 Rebound Effect and Ethical Intersections: Unintended Consequences

An often-overlooked environmental impact is the ‘rebound effect,’ sometimes referred to as Jevons Paradox. This occurs when efficiency gains in a technology lead to an increase in its overall usage, potentially negating or even surpassing the initial environmental benefits. For AI in healthcare, improving the energy efficiency of an AI model or hardware might lead to its more widespread and intensive deployment, resulting in a net increase in energy consumption and environmental footprint [19]. For example, if AI makes diagnostic imaging significantly cheaper and faster, the volume of imaging performed might increase dramatically, leading to higher overall energy consumption despite per-scan efficiency gains.

Furthermore, the environmental impact intersects with broader ethical considerations in AI. The development and deployment of environmentally unsustainable AI disproportionately affect vulnerable populations who are often at the front lines of climate change impacts and who may lack access to the benefits of AI-powered healthcare [20]. Ethical AI must therefore encompass environmental justice, ensuring that the pursuit of technological advancement does not exacerbate existing inequalities or create new environmental burdens for marginalized communities.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Strategies for Sustainable AI in Healthcare: Towards Green AI Principles

Mitigating the environmental footprint of AI in healthcare requires a multi-pronged approach that integrates ‘Green AI’ principles across the entire lifecycle of AI systems, from algorithmic design to hardware deployment and policy frameworks. This involves deliberate choices at various levels of abstraction, from fundamental research to operational practices.

3.1 Development of Energy-Efficient Algorithms: Software Optimization

The most direct way to reduce AI’s environmental impact is to make the algorithms themselves inherently more energy-efficient. This involves optimizing computational complexity without sacrificing performance or accuracy, especially in safety-critical healthcare applications [21].

3.1.1 Model Optimization Techniques

• Pruning: This technique involves removing redundant or less important connections (weights) or neurons within a neural network. By identifying and eliminating these non-essential components, the model becomes ‘sparser,’ requiring fewer computations during inference and potentially during training, leading to reduced memory usage and faster execution [22]. For instance, a medical image classification model could be pruned to maintain high accuracy while significantly reducing its computational load.
• Quantization: Deep learning models typically use high-precision floating-point numbers (e.g., 32-bit or 16-bit) for calculations. Quantization involves reducing the precision of these numbers (e.g., to 8-bit integers or even binary). This dramatically decreases memory footprint and computational requirements, as integer operations are much faster and more energy-efficient than floating-point operations. While it can introduce a slight drop in accuracy, techniques like quantization-aware training can minimize this impact, making quantized models highly viable for many healthcare applications [22].
• Knowledge Distillation: This involves training a smaller, simpler ‘student’ model to mimic the behavior of a larger, more complex ‘teacher’ model. The student model learns from the outputs (logits) of the teacher model rather than directly from the raw data. The resulting compact student model retains much of the teacher’s performance but requires significantly less computational power for inference, making it suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices or for real-time applications in clinics [23].
• Efficient Architectures: Designing neural network architectures that are inherently more parameter-efficient and computationally light, such as MobileNets or EfficientNets, can achieve high performance with fewer resources. These architectures are specifically engineered for mobile and edge devices, making them ideal for integration into medical IoT or portable diagnostic tools.

3.1.2 Algorithm Design and Lifecycle Assessment

• Explainable AI (XAI) and Interpretable Models: While not directly an energy-saving technique, XAI can indirectly contribute to sustainability. By building more transparent and interpretable models, developers can gain insights into why a model makes certain predictions, potentially identifying areas where data collection or processing could be more targeted, reducing the need for excessively large or complex models. Furthermore, XAI can foster trust and reduce the need for multiple, redundant validation runs [24].
• Federated Learning: Instead of centralizing all healthcare data for AI training, federated learning allows models to be trained locally on decentralized datasets (e.g., within individual hospitals or clinics). Only model updates (weights) are shared and aggregated, not the raw data. This approach significantly reduces the energy footprint associated with data transmission and storage, while also enhancing data privacy and security [25]. It is particularly well-suited for healthcare where data privacy is paramount.
• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for AI Models: Incorporating LCA principles from the outset of AI model development can guide decisions towards sustainability. This involves considering the energy and resource consumption across the entire model lifecycle: data collection, preprocessing, training, validation, deployment, and maintenance. Establishing metrics to track and optimize these aspects is crucial [21].
• Hyperparameter Tuning Optimization: Instead of brute-force grid searches, using more efficient techniques like Bayesian optimization or evolutionary algorithms can significantly reduce the number of training runs required to find optimal hyperparameters, thereby saving considerable energy during the development phase.
• TinyML and Edge AI: Deploying AI models directly on edge devices (e.g., smart sensors, wearable health monitors, embedded systems in medical devices) with minimal computational resources reduces the need to send all data to the cloud for processing, saving energy on data transmission and centralized data center operations [26]. This localized intelligence can also provide faster insights for time-critical medical interventions.

3.2 Optimization of Hardware and Infrastructure: The Physical Foundation

Beyond algorithmic efficiency, the underlying hardware and infrastructure play a pivotal role in the environmental impact of AI. Optimizing these physical components is essential for sustainable AI in healthcare [27].

3.2.1 Energy-Efficient Hardware

• Specialized AI Accelerators: While GPUs are powerful, custom-designed AI accelerators like TPUs (Google) or NPUs (various vendors) are often more energy-efficient for specific AI workloads. These chips are optimized for tensor operations, which are fundamental to deep learning, allowing them to perform more computations per watt than general-purpose CPUs or even some older GPUs. Healthcare organizations should prioritize hardware that offers the best performance-to-power ratio for their specific AI tasks.
• Low-Power Processors: For inference tasks on edge devices, low-power microcontrollers and embedded systems are crucial. Advances in chip design are continuously yielding more powerful yet energy-efficient processors that can handle complex AI models locally, reducing the reliance on cloud infrastructure.
• Hardware Lifecycle Management: Extending the lifespan of existing hardware through proper maintenance, repairs, and strategic upgrades (e.g., upgrading RAM or specific processing units rather than replacing an entire server) can significantly reduce the demand for new manufacturing and thus the associated environmental footprint. Implementing robust inventory management systems for IT assets can aid in this process.

3.2.2 Green Data Center Practices

• Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) Optimization: Continuously striving for lower PUE values (closer to 1.0) is fundamental. This involves optimizing power delivery systems, utilizing more efficient cooling technologies, and reducing parasitic loads. Advanced PUE monitoring allows for real-time adjustments to maximize efficiency.
• Advanced Cooling Technologies: Moving beyond traditional air cooling, techniques like liquid cooling (direct-to-chip or immersion cooling) are far more energy-efficient and can drastically reduce the energy required for heat dissipation. These systems can also enable higher server densities, optimizing space utilization. Furthermore, leveraging ambient conditions through ‘free cooling’ where external air or water is used can significantly reduce energy consumption in appropriate climates [11].
• Server Virtualization and Consolidation: Virtualizing servers allows multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server, maximizing hardware utilization and reducing the total number of physical servers required. Consolidating workloads onto fewer, more powerful, and energy-efficient servers minimizes idle power consumption and overall energy draw.
• Renewable Energy Integration: Powering data centers directly with on-site renewable energy (solar, wind) or through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with renewable energy providers is a cornerstone of decarbonizing AI operations. This shifts the energy source away from fossil fuels, drastically reducing associated carbon emissions [12].
• Geographic Optimization: Strategically locating data centers in regions with abundant renewable energy sources (e.g., hydroelectric power in certain northern regions, robust wind/solar grids) and naturally cooler climates can minimize the environmental impact. This requires careful consideration of data locality and latency requirements for healthcare applications.

3.3 Sustainable Data Management: Responsible Data Stewardship

The vast amounts of data generated and used in healthcare AI necessitate sustainable data management practices to reduce their environmental footprint [27].

• Data Minimization: The principle of ‘collect only what is necessary’ should be applied rigorously. Avoiding the collection and storage of redundant or irrelevant data reduces storage needs, processing power, and transmission energy. Implementing strict data governance policies to define data retention periods and automated deletion schedules for unnecessary data is crucial.
• Data Compression and Deduplication: Employing advanced data compression techniques (e.g., lossless compression for medical images) and deduplication across storage systems significantly reduces the physical storage footprint, thereby lowering energy consumption for storage and associated cooling. This also speeds up data transmission, further saving energy.
• Intelligent Data Tiering: Implementing tiered storage strategies allows for optimization. Frequently accessed, critical data can reside on faster, more energy-intensive storage, while archival, less frequently accessed data can be moved to slower, more energy-efficient ‘cold storage’ or even offline tape libraries. This ensures that energy is expended only when necessary for active data.
• Data Lifecycle Management (DLM): Establishing clear DLM policies, from data creation to archiving and deletion, can ensure that data is managed efficiently throughout its existence. Regular audits of stored data to identify and remove unnecessary or obsolete datasets are vital. This aligns with principles of ‘data hygiene’ and responsible data stewardship.
• Decentralized and Edge Data Processing: As mentioned in Section 3.1, processing data closer to its source (edge computing) reduces the need for large-scale data transfers to centralized cloud data centers, saving network energy and reducing the load on central infrastructure. This is particularly relevant for real-time patient monitoring and localized diagnostic AI systems.

3.4 Adoption of Renewable Energy Sources: Decarbonizing the Grid

The most impactful strategy for reducing the carbon emissions associated with AI in healthcare is transitioning to renewable energy sources for powering computational infrastructure. This applies both to dedicated data centers and to the broader IT infrastructure within healthcare facilities [28].

• Direct Procurement and On-site Generation: Healthcare providers and cloud companies can invest in their own on-site renewable energy generation (e.g., rooftop solar panels, wind turbines) or procure renewable energy directly from dedicated off-site facilities. This offers direct control over the energy source.
• Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Entering into long-term PPAs with renewable energy project developers is a common strategy. These agreements guarantee a supply of renewable energy, often allowing organizations to claim carbon neutrality for their electricity consumption.
• Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs): While less direct than PPAs, purchasing RECs allows organizations to fund renewable energy projects and claim environmental attributes, contributing to the growth of renewable energy markets. However, the efficacy of RECs in driving new renewable energy capacity is a subject of ongoing debate.
• Cloud Provider Selection: Healthcare organizations leveraging cloud computing for AI should prioritize providers with explicit commitments to 100% renewable energy and transparent reporting on their environmental performance. Many leading cloud providers have ambitious sustainability goals and offer tools to monitor the environmental impact of cloud usage [28]. Selecting server regions powered by high percentages of clean energy is a practical step.
• Grid Modernization and Smart Grids: Investing in and advocating for a modernized, smart electricity grid that can efficiently integrate and manage variable renewable energy sources is a broader, systemic solution that benefits all sectors, including AI-powered healthcare.

3.5 Implementation of Circular Economy Principles for IT Hardware: Beyond Linear Consumption

The traditional linear ‘take-make-dispose’ economic model is unsustainable for AI hardware. A shift towards circular economy principles is essential to minimize e-waste, conserve resources, and reduce the embodied energy and carbon footprint of IT equipment [29].

• Design for Longevity and Repairability: Manufacturers should design AI hardware with durability, modularity, and easy repairability in mind. This includes using standardized, easily replaceable components, providing access to spare parts, and offering repair manuals. This contrasts with practices that lead to planned obsolescence.
• Refurbishment and Reuse: Establishing robust programs for refurbishing and reusing AI hardware, both within healthcare systems and through specialized recycling partners, can significantly extend the useful life of devices. Servers, networking equipment, and even specialized accelerators can often be repurposed for less demanding tasks or for deployment in environments where cutting-edge performance isn’t strictly necessary. This also applies to medical devices integrated with AI.
• Responsible Recycling and Material Recovery: When hardware reaches its end-of-life, it must be sent to certified e-waste recyclers who can safely dismantle components, recover valuable materials (precious metals, rare earth elements), and properly dispose of hazardous substances. This reduces the need for virgin material extraction and prevents pollution. Collaboration with organizations committed to energy-efficient Green AI architectures that support circular economies is crucial [30].
• Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) Models: Shifting from outright ownership of IT hardware to subscription-based ‘hardware-as-a-service’ models can incentivize manufacturers to design more durable and recyclable products, as they retain ownership and responsibility for the product’s entire lifecycle. This aligns with circular economy goals by promoting resource efficiency and reducing waste.
• Supply Chain Transparency and Ethical Sourcing: Ensuring that raw materials for AI hardware are sourced ethically and sustainably, without exploiting labor or causing undue environmental damage, is a critical component of a circular economy approach. Transparency in the supply chain allows for accountability and promotes responsible practices from mining to manufacturing.

3.6 Fostering a Culture of Sustainability in Healthcare AI Development

Beyond technical strategies, a fundamental shift in mindset and culture within the healthcare AI community is required.

• Education and Training: Equipping AI developers, data scientists, and healthcare IT professionals with knowledge about the environmental impact of their work and ‘Green AI’ best practices is crucial. This should include training on energy-efficient coding, model optimization, and sustainable hardware choices.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Bringing together AI experts, environmental scientists, sustainability officers, and healthcare professionals can foster holistic solutions that consider both clinical efficacy and ecological responsibility.
• Metrics and Reporting Tools: Developing and adopting standardized tools and metrics to measure, monitor, and report the environmental footprint of AI projects (e.g., energy consumption, CO2 emissions, water usage per model run or per patient outcome) can drive accountability and continuous improvement. This will allow for benchmarking and identification of inefficiencies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Policy and Regulatory Considerations: Shaping the Future of Sustainable AI

To effectively steer the development and deployment of AI in healthcare towards sustainability, robust policy and regulatory frameworks are indispensable. These frameworks can provide guidance, incentives, and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that technological progress aligns with environmental protection [21, 31].

4.1 Development of Environmental Standards and Certifications

• Industry-Wide Standards for AI: Governments and international bodies should work with industry stakeholders to establish clear, measurable environmental performance standards specifically for AI systems in healthcare. These standards should cover key metrics such as energy consumption per unit of computation (e.g., per inference, per training epoch), associated carbon emissions, and e-waste generation over the product lifecycle [32].
• ‘Green AI’ Certifications: Developing certification schemes, similar to Energy Star or LEED ratings, for AI models, software, and hardware could guide organizations and consumers towards more sustainable options. A ‘Green AI’ label could indicate adherence to best practices in energy efficiency, resource use, and ethical sourcing.
• Standardized Methodologies for Impact Assessment: Creating universally accepted methodologies for calculating the carbon, energy, and water footprint of AI models and infrastructure is crucial for comparability and accountability. Without consistent measurement, it is difficult to track progress or enforce standards. This could draw upon existing life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks adapted for AI systems.
• Data Center Efficiency Benchmarks: Mandating and regularly updating minimum efficiency standards (e.g., PUE targets) for data centers that host healthcare AI operations can drive innovation in sustainable infrastructure.

4.2 Incentivization and Funding for Sustainable AI

• Financial Incentives for Green AI: Governments and regulatory bodies can implement policies that incentivize the adoption of sustainable AI practices in healthcare. This could include tax credits, grants, or subsidies for organizations investing in energy-efficient hardware, developing ‘green AI’ algorithms, or migrating to renewable energy-powered infrastructure [27].
• Public Procurement Policies: Government healthcare systems and public research institutions can adopt procurement policies that prioritize AI solutions and services from vendors who demonstrate strong commitments to environmental sustainability and transparently report their environmental footprint. This can create market demand for ‘Green AI’ products.
• Research and Development Funding: Directing government funding towards research in energy-efficient AI algorithms, sustainable hardware design, and novel cooling technologies for data centers specifically tailored for healthcare applications can accelerate innovation in this area.
• Carbon Pricing and Emissions Trading: Implementing carbon pricing mechanisms or emissions trading schemes that apply to the IT sector, including data centers, can internalize the environmental cost of carbon emissions, incentivizing organizations to reduce their footprint.

4.3 Public Reporting, Transparency, and Accountability

• Mandatory Environmental Disclosure: Requiring organizations that develop and deploy large-scale AI in healthcare to publicly disclose their environmental impact metrics (e.g., annual energy consumption, carbon emissions, water usage associated with their AI operations) can promote transparency and accountability [33]. This would allow stakeholders, including patients, regulators, and investors, to make informed decisions.
• Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs): For major AI projects or infrastructure developments (e.g., building a new data center to support a regional AI healthcare initiative), mandating comprehensive EIAs can ensure that potential environmental harms are identified and mitigated before deployment.
• Auditing and Verification: Establishing independent auditing and verification processes for environmental impact reports can ensure the accuracy and credibility of disclosed data. This builds trust and prevents ‘greenwashing.’
• Data Privacy and Security in Context: While sustainability is crucial, it must not undermine data privacy and security. Policies need to ensure that sustainable data management practices (e.g., data minimization, federated learning) are implemented in a way that fully complies with healthcare data protection regulations (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR).

4.4 International Cooperation and Global Frameworks

• Harmonization of Standards: Given the global nature of AI development and healthcare challenges, international cooperation is essential to harmonize environmental standards for AI. This facilitates cross-border collaboration and prevents regulatory fragmentation.
• Sharing Best Practices: International forums and organizations can serve as platforms for sharing best practices, research findings, and successful strategies for sustainable AI in healthcare, accelerating collective progress.
• Global Targets: Aligning AI sustainability efforts with broader global climate goals (e.g., Paris Agreement) can ensure that the healthcare AI sector contributes meaningfully to achieving net-zero emissions targets.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges and Future Outlook

While the path towards sustainable AI in healthcare is clear, it is not without significant challenges. Navigating these complexities will require continuous innovation, robust policy, and a commitment from all stakeholders.

5.1 Complexity of Measurement and Trade-offs

Accurately quantifying the environmental footprint of specific AI models or healthcare applications remains challenging. The total impact depends on numerous factors, including hardware specifics, data center efficiency, energy grid mix, and the model’s lifecycle stage (training vs. inference). Developing standardized, granular metrics and tools for measurement is an ongoing effort [21]. Furthermore, there are often inherent trade-offs between AI model performance (e.g., accuracy, speed) and its environmental impact. Achieving optimal diagnostic accuracy might require a more complex, energy-intensive model. Balancing these competing objectives, particularly in critical healthcare scenarios, requires careful ethical and practical consideration.

5.2 Rapid Evolution of AI and Scalability of Green Solutions

The field of AI is evolving at an astonishing pace, with new architectures, algorithms, and applications emerging constantly. This rapid innovation makes it challenging for sustainability efforts to keep pace. Solutions developed for current AI models might quickly become obsolete with the advent of next-generation technologies. Ensuring that ‘Green AI’ principles are integrated into the design philosophy of new AI paradigms, rather than being an afterthought, is crucial. Moreover, the scalability of many green solutions, such as deploying bespoke liquid cooling systems or securing 100% renewable energy for every facility, needs to be addressed as AI adoption in healthcare continues to expand globally.

5.3 Bridging the Gap: Ethical AI and Green AI Synergy

The intersection of AI ethics and environmental sustainability presents both challenges and opportunities. Ethical concerns like bias, fairness, and privacy must be considered alongside environmental impact. For instance, while federated learning is more sustainable, it also brings complexities regarding data governance and model aggregation fairness. A holistic approach that integrates ethical AI principles with environmental ones from the outset, ensuring that solutions address both human and planetary well-being, is essential [3].

5.4 The Promise of AI for Climate Solutions

Despite its own environmental footprint, it is important to acknowledge that AI also holds immense potential to accelerate solutions to climate change and broader environmental issues, including those that impact human health. AI can optimize energy grids, predict extreme weather events, model climate change impacts, enhance resource management, and accelerate materials science research for sustainable technologies [34]. In healthcare, AI could optimize supply chains to reduce waste, improve preventative care to lessen the burden on high-emission acute care, and design more efficient medical devices. Harnessing this positive potential of AI while mitigating its inherent footprint is the ultimate goal.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into healthcare presents a paradigm shift, promising unprecedented advancements in diagnostic precision, personalized treatment, and operational efficiency. However, this transformative potential is shadowed by a significant and growing environmental footprint, encompassing substantial energy consumption, associated carbon emissions, the proliferation of electronic waste, and considerable water usage for computational infrastructure. Ignoring these ecological costs would undermine the very mission of healthcare to improve human well-being, as environmental degradation poses direct threats to global public health.

To ensure a truly sustainable future for AI in healthcare, a concerted and multi-faceted approach is imperative. This involves a fundamental shift towards ‘Green AI’ principles across the entire lifecycle of AI systems. Key strategies include the development of inherently energy-efficient algorithms through techniques like pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation; the optimization of hardware and data center infrastructure with a focus on specialized accelerators, advanced cooling, and high PUE; the implementation of sustainable data management practices such as data minimization, compression, and intelligent tiering; and a pervasive adoption of renewable energy sources to power all AI operations. Furthermore, embracing circular economy principles for IT hardware, emphasizing design for longevity, reuse, and responsible recycling, is crucial to curb electronic waste.

Beyond technological solutions, robust policy and regulatory frameworks are essential. Establishing clear environmental standards and certification schemes, incentivizing sustainable AI practices through grants and procurement policies, and mandating transparency through public reporting of environmental impact metrics will provide the necessary governance. International cooperation and the integration of ethical considerations alongside environmental ones will further solidify this commitment.

While challenges remain, including the complexity of measurement, the rapid evolution of AI, and the need to balance performance with sustainability, the imperative to act is clear. By proactively addressing the environmental challenges associated with AI technologies, the healthcare sector can harness the full potential of this powerful tool to advance human health, not at the expense of, but in harmony with, planetary well-being. This requires a collective responsibility from researchers, developers, policymakers, healthcare providers, and the public to foster a sustainable and responsible future for AI in medicine.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] Health Improve. (2025). Environmental Impacts Of AI In Healthcare. Retrieved from health-improve.org

[2] Radiological Society of North America. (2024). Researchers look at environmental impacts of AI tools. Radiology. Retrieved from rsna.org

[3] Wikipedia. (2025). Ethics of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org

[4] PubMed. (2025). Climate change and artificial intelligence in healthcare: Review and recommendations towards a sustainable future. Retrieved from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

[5] Journal of Education and Health Promotion. (2025). Sustainable materials for artificial intelligence. Retrieved from journals.lww.com

[6] The Lancet Planetary Health. (2024). Climate change and health: The Lancet Countdown 2023 report. Retrieved from [thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00223-2/fulltext]

[7] AI in Healthcare. (2025). Sustainable AI: 5 ways healthcare can do its part. Retrieved from aiin.healthcare

[8] Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650.

[9] Marr, B. (2021). Big Data: What Is Big Data And Why Is It Important? Forbes. Retrieved from [forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2021/04/16/big-data-what-is-big-data-and-why-is-it-important/]

[10] Radiological Society of North America. (2024). Researchers look at environmental impacts of AI tools. Retrieved from rsna.org

[11] Google Cloud. (2023). Sustainability in Google Cloud. Retrieved from [cloud.google.com/sustainability]

[12] Green City Times. (2025). Sustainable Healthcare AI. Retrieved from greencitytimes.com

[13] European Environmental Agency. (2020). Electronic waste. Retrieved from [eea.europa.eu/themes/waste/waste-management/electronic-waste]

[14] World Health Organization. (2021). Children and e-waste: A looming threat to health. Retrieved from [who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032612]

[15] Wikipedia. (2025). The water consumption of AI data centers. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org

[16] Wikipedia. (2025). Water footprint. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org

[17] The Verge. (2023). Microsoft is buying a lot of water. Retrieved from [theverge.com/2023/10/5/23903173/microsoft-water-data-centers-desalination]

[18] arXiv. (2023). Towards green AI-based software systems: an architecture-centric approach (GAISSA). Retrieved from [arxiv.org/abs/2307.09964]

[19] Jevons, W. S. (1865). The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines. Macmillan and Co.

[20] Nature. (2023). Climate change disproportionately harms communities of color. Retrieved from [nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03099-0]

[21] PubMed. (2025). Climate change and artificial intelligence in healthcare: Review and recommendations towards a sustainable future. Retrieved from [pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38918123/]

[22] IEEE Spectrum. (2021). The Race to Make AI More Efficient. Retrieved from [spectrum.ieee.org/the-race-to-make-ai-more-efficient]

[23] Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015). Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531.

[24] Samek, W., Montavon, G., Vedaldi, A., Hansen, L. K., & Müller, K. R. (2021). Explainable AI: From black box to interpretable models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00064.

[25] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

[26] TinyML. (2023). What is TinyML? Retrieved from [tinyml.org/what-is-tinyml/]

[27] AI in Healthcare. (2025). Sustainable AI: 5 ways healthcare can do its part. Retrieved from aiin.healthcare

[28] Green City Times. (2025). Sustainable Healthcare AI. Retrieved from greencitytimes.com

[29] Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2023). What is the circular economy? Retrieved from [ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/what-is-the-circular-economy]

[30] arXiv. (2025). Energy-Efficient Green AI Architectures for Circular Economies Through Multi-Layered Sustainable Resource Optimization Framework. Retrieved from [arxiv.org/abs/2506.12262]

[31] European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Retrieved from [eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206]

[32] ISO. (2023). ISO 14001 Environmental management. Retrieved from [iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html]

[33] The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2022). AI and Cybersecurity: The Green Perspective. Retrieved from [enisa.europa.eu/news/enisa-news/ai-and-cybersecurity-the-green-perspective]

[34] PwC. (2020). AI for the planet: How AI can tackle climate change. Retrieved from [pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and-analytics/artificial-intelligence/ai-for-the-planet.html]