A Vulnerable Legacy: Third-Party Breach and Missing MFA in the British Library Cyber-Attack

Summary

The British Library’s 2023 cyber-attack, a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in legacy systems and third-party dependencies, exposed critical data and disrupted services. This incident underscores the increasing threat of ransomware attacks targeting organizations with complex infrastructures and the crucial role of multi-factor authentication (MFA) in bolstering cybersecurity. The library’s transparent response offers valuable lessons for organizations grappling with similar challenges.

Are outdated storage systems putting your patient data at risk? Learn about TrueNASs robust security.

Main Story

The Rhysida ransomware attack on the British Library back in October 2023, it really should be a wake-up call for all of us, especially those of us working with older systems. You know, it’s a stark reminder that cyber threats are just getting more aggressive. This wasn’t some minor thing either; 600GB of their data, including personal information from staff and users, was stolen and then published. The whole incident really exposed some big vulnerabilities, particularly concerning third-party access and the lack of proper multi-factor authentication, or MFA.

Let’s talk about how it all happened. Because the exact entry point isn’t public knowledge, we can only guess, but the British Library’s system was a complex mix of old and new technology. This kind of complexity? Well it can create a lot of openings for attackers. Keeping security tight across all platforms in a situation like this, its a huge challenge. And it’s not just about their internal systems, third-party breaches are becoming way too common. You see, these happen when attackers find a weak spot in a supplier’s systems and use that as a back door into the client’s network. Since most businesses now rely so heavily on outside vendors, it’s a growing problem. Maybe it was a vendor, that’s how Rhysida got in at the British Library. We just don’t know. What we DO know, is that if they had used stronger MFA everywhere, across the board, this whole mess might have been contained, if not completely stopped. MFA, for those that might not know, requires several verification methods, not just one password. Its an added layer of security that just makes it harder to break through.

The aftermath of the attack was pretty terrible. The library was forced to shut down many of its services, including its website, online registration and, even access to their digital collections. The financial damage? A staggering £7 million. A HUGE chunk of the library’s reserve budget just vanished. On top of that, the damage to their reputation and the loss of user trust is going to be something they’ll be dealing with for a long time.

But, it’s not all doom and gloom. Actually, the way the British Library handled the situation gives us some valuable lessons we can all learn from. This incident really emphasizes how important these things are:

  • Enhanced Network Monitoring: Constantly keeping an eye on everything, including those old systems, is vital for spotting anything suspicious. Think of it like security guards constantly patrolling your building, day and night.
  • External Security Experts: Having some on-call cybersecurity specialists at the ready makes a huge difference. When things go wrong, you need to know how to react fast and mitigate the damage, right?
  • Comprehensive MFA: You should make sure you’ve implemented MFA across all external access points, and I mean all of them, even for third-party vendors. It can be a bit of a hassle at first, but it’s worth it in the long run.
  • Regular Security Reviews: You can’t just set up security and forget about it. You need regular reviews to help find potential vulnerabilities before they become a problem.
  • Network Segmentation: Divide your network into sections, so that if something does get through, they’re limited in what they can access. Like having firewalls inside your building, not just the outside.
  • Business Continuity Planning: Plan ahead for system outages. Regularly run tests. You need to make sure your business can function if everything just stops working one day. You know, for instance, one time, I was working on a project that was suddenly wiped out. The company hadn’t run tests on their backup plan, so we were dead in the water.
  • Cyber Risk Management: Really, you need to maintain a full, top to bottom, view of your cyber risks. This will allow you to prioritize where you invest in your security. You can’t be penny-wise and pound foolish with this.

Looking to the future, what does this all mean? Well, with increasing reliance on third-party vendors and the growth in sophistication of cyber attacks, solid security isn’t optional anymore, it is, quite simply, essential. Robust security measures like MFA are paramount to safeguarding sensitive data, and, just as importantly, keeping business running. Ransomware is only getting worse, and they are going to keep targeting older systems, and exploiting weak third-party access, for now at least. The British Library certainly learnt a costly lesson, but we can, and should, learn from their mistakes. So, really, investing in cybersecurity, its not just a cost. It’s investing in your business, and it’s an essential step to protecting your future. As of today, January 30, 2025, this information is current and may be subject to change in the future.

5 Comments

  1. So, a cyber attack, you say? Did the attackers check out any overdue books while they were rifling through the data? Asking for a librarian… maybe they know my address?

    • That’s a great point about the potential for accessing library user data. The risk is very real, and highlights how data breaches can expose sensitive personal information, not just what’s on file for staff. It’s definitely something to be mindful of!

      Editor: MedTechNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  2. So, they lost 7 million pounds and that’s just what they know about? I wonder how many late fees that would have covered… Maybe they should have offered a discount on fines as an apology?

    • That’s a fun way to look at it! The financial impact is certainly significant, and you’re right, it does put things into perspective. Perhaps a discount on late fees would have been a great way to rebuild some trust with library users after all this.

      Editor: MedTechNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  3. Given the reliance on third-party vendors, what specific security protocols should organizations mandate to mitigate risks originating from their partners?

Leave a Reply to Gracie Parsons Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*