The United States Healthcare Workforce Crisis: An In-Depth Analysis of Shortages, Training, Recruitment, and Policy Imperatives

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

The United States is currently navigating a profound and multifaceted healthcare workforce crisis, manifesting as critical shortages across virtually every sector, including but not limited to geriatrics, nursing, primary care, behavioral health, and direct care services. This comprehensive report offers an exhaustive examination of the underlying factors exacerbating these shortages, delves into the efficacy and limitations of existing training models and certification programs, meticulously explores evidence-based strategies for recruitment and retention, and articulates a series of robust policy recommendations indispensable for cultivating a sustainable, highly skilled, and appropriately compensated healthcare workforce. The findings unequivocally highlight the imperative for radical and interconnected reforms, not merely incremental adjustments, to ensure the consistent delivery of high-quality, equitable, and accessible care to an increasingly aging, diverse, and complex patient population across all geographic and socioeconomic strata.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The healthcare workforce in the United States is at a critical juncture, confronting unprecedented challenges that threaten the stability and capacity of the entire healthcare ecosystem. Chronic shortages, pervasive across a multitude of disciplines and regions, have reached alarming levels, casting a long shadow over the nation’s ability to meet escalating healthcare demands. While the original article briefly mentioned geriatrics, nursing, and primary care, it is crucial to understand that the crisis extends to a broader array of professions, including mental health specialists, allied health professionals, and the critical direct care workforce. These shortages are not merely statistical anomalies; they represent a fundamental erosion of the human capital upon which a functioning healthcare system relies, impacting everything from preventative care to complex surgical interventions.

Historically, workforce planning in healthcare has often been reactive rather than proactive, struggling to keep pace with dynamic demographic shifts, epidemiological transitions, and technological advancements. The current crisis is a culmination of decades of underinvestment, systemic vulnerabilities, and emerging pressures that have now reached a tipping point. Addressing these profound challenges demands a holistic and integrated approach. This involves not only a nuanced understanding of the myriad contributing factors but also a critical evaluation of the current landscape of professional education and credentialing, the development and rigorous implementation of effective recruitment and retention strategies, and, fundamentally, the enactment of transformative policy reforms at both federal and state levels. This report aims to provide such a comprehensive framework, emphasizing the interconnectedness of these components in forging a resilient and responsive healthcare workforce for the future.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Factors Contributing to Healthcare Workforce Shortages

The current healthcare workforce crisis is not attributable to a single cause but rather to a complex interplay of demographic, economic, educational, and systemic factors. Understanding these drivers is paramount to developing effective interventions.

2.1 Aging Population and Increased Demand

The demographic transition sweeping across the United States stands as a primary and undeniable catalyst for the healthcare workforce crisis. The Baby Boomer generation, comprising approximately 73 million individuals, is rapidly entering its senior years; by 2030, all Baby Boomers will be at least 65 years old. This unprecedented demographic shift is poised to dramatically escalate the demand for healthcare services across the continuum of care (eldercareworkforce.org).

Beyond sheer numbers, an aging population presents a more complex set of healthcare needs. Older adults typically experience higher rates of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, and dementia. They also often manage multiple co-morbidities (multimorbidity), requiring more complex, coordinated, and resource-intensive care. This includes frequent doctor visits, specialized diagnostic procedures, polypharmacy management, long-term care services, and an increasing need for palliative and end-of-life care. The growth in demand is not uniformly distributed; it places particular strain on specialties like geriatrics, primary care, home healthcare, and skilled nursing facilities. The increased longevity of the population, while a triumph of modern medicine, also means individuals live longer with chronic conditions, necessitating prolonged and often more intensive healthcare interventions throughout their extended lifespans.

2.2 Retirement of Experienced Professionals

Compounding the surge in demand is the simultaneous exodus of a substantial segment of the current healthcare workforce due to retirement. This phenomenon, often termed the ‘silver tsunami’ of the healthcare workforce, signifies not only a quantitative loss of personnel but also a qualitative loss of invaluable experience, institutional knowledge, and mentorship capacity. For instance, projections indicate that over 30% of nurses in developed nations, including the U.S., are nearing retirement age, with similar trends observed across physician specialties and allied health professions (healthcarereaders.com).

This trend is particularly acute among nurses, where the average age continues to rise. The loss of experienced clinicians can have far-reaching consequences: it diminishes the pool of preceptors for new graduates, strains remaining staff with heavier workloads, and can negatively impact patient outcomes due due to reduced clinical expertise on the front lines. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated these retirement trends, with many seasoned professionals opting for early retirement, unwilling or unable to continue under the immense physical and psychological pressures of the crisis. This ‘brain drain’ creates a significant gap that newly trained professionals, despite their enthusiasm, may take years to fill in terms of experience and nuanced judgment.

2.3 Educational and Training Constraints

The pipeline for producing new healthcare professionals is severely constricted, struggling to meet the rising demand. The capacity of educational institutions to train the next generation of doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals is limited by a confluence of factors, creating bottlenecks at various stages. One of the most significant constraints is the persistent shortage of qualified faculty. For example, nursing schools annually turn away tens of thousands of qualified applicants, not due to a lack of student interest, but primarily due to insufficient faculty, clinical sites, and classroom space. In 2022 alone, over 80,000 qualified nursing school applicants were denied admission, a stark illustration of this systemic bottleneck (hcm4hro.com).

The faculty shortage in nursing, medicine, and other health professions is often attributed to several factors: lower academic salaries compared to clinical practice, lack of PhD-prepared individuals willing to enter academia, and the demanding nature of academic roles. Furthermore, securing sufficient clinical training sites and preceptors for students has become increasingly challenging. Hospitals and clinics are often stretched thin, making it difficult to allocate resources for student supervision. The limited availability of residency slots for medical graduates, particularly in primary care and certain specialties, further restricts the influx of new physicians. The high cost of education and the substantial student loan debt incurred by graduates also act as disincentives, steering potential candidates away from lower-paying but high-need specialties like primary care or geriatrics.

2.4 Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction

The demanding nature of healthcare work, characterized by high workloads, emotionally taxing situations, and increasing administrative burdens, significantly contributes to widespread burnout and job dissatisfaction among healthcare workers. This phenomenon fuels high turnover rates and discourages new entrants into the profession. Surveys consistently reveal alarming statistics: nearly 60% of healthcare employees report experiencing feelings of burnout, and only about 40% express genuine job satisfaction (pulivarthigroup.com).

Burnout is a syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization (a cynical attitude toward patients), and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment. Beyond the inherent stress of critical care, systemic issues exacerbate burnout. These include inadequate staffing ratios, leading to excessive workloads and compromised patient safety; the burden of electronic health record (EHR) documentation, which often diverts time from direct patient care; and the increasing prevalence of workplace violence, which compromises the physical and psychological safety of staff. Many healthcare professionals also experience moral injury, defined as the psychological distress resulting from actions, or lack thereof, that violate one’s moral or ethical beliefs, often arising when systemic constraints prevent them from delivering the quality of care they believe patients deserve. The cumulative trauma from the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly deepened these issues, leaving many professionals emotionally depleted and questioning their career choices.

2.5 Other Contributing Factors

Beyond the primary drivers, several other systemic and structural issues contribute to the persistent healthcare workforce shortages.

2.5.1 Geographic Imbalances

The distribution of healthcare professionals in the U.S. is highly uneven. While urban and suburban areas may experience shortages, rural and frontier communities face profound deficits across virtually all specialties. This maldistribution is driven by factors such as limited economic opportunities, lack of amenities, professional isolation, and insufficient infrastructure in rural areas, making it challenging to recruit and retain practitioners. Patients in these regions often face significant travel burdens, extended wait times, or complete absence of specialized care.

2.5.2 Specialty Imbalances

Even within areas that are relatively well-staffed, critical specialty shortages persist. Primary care physicians remain in short supply, a situation exacerbated by a compensation structure that often favors highly specialized procedures over comprehensive, longitudinal patient management. Similar shortages are observed in behavioral health (psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers), public health, and certain allied health professions like physical therapists, occupational therapists, and medical laboratory scientists. This imbalance skews the healthcare system towards episodic, specialist-driven care rather than preventive, holistic approaches.

2.5.3 Lack of Diversity and Cultural Competence

The healthcare workforce often does not reflect the racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity of the patient population it serves. This lack of diversity can hinder culturally competent care, lead to communication barriers, and perpetuate health disparities. Patients from underrepresented groups may feel less trusting or understood by providers who do not share similar backgrounds or experiences. Efforts to diversify the workforce are essential not only for equity but also for improving patient outcomes and public health, particularly in a multicultural society.

2.5.4 Regulatory Barriers and Scope of Practice Issues

Outdated regulatory frameworks and restrictive scope of practice laws for advanced practice providers (APPs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs), limit their ability to practice to the full extent of their education and training in many states. These restrictions can impede access to care, particularly in underserved areas, by preventing highly qualified professionals from autonomously providing services they are competent to deliver. Additionally, interstate licensure portability issues create unnecessary hurdles for healthcare professionals wishing to relocate or practice across state lines, further limiting workforce mobility and responsiveness to regional needs.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Evaluation of Training Models and Certification Programs

Effective training models and robust certification programs are foundational to building a competent healthcare workforce. However, current systems often fall short in preparing enough professionals for high-demand specialties and in adapting to evolving patient needs.

3.1 Geriatrics Training and Certification

The shortage of geriatricians in the U.S. is a critical and worsening problem. With fewer than 7,300 board-certified geriatricians serving a population of over 56 million older adults, the ratio stands at approximately one geriatrician per 10,000 individuals aged 65 and over (beckershospitalreview.com). This deficit is particularly alarming given the complex healthcare needs of older adults. Several factors contribute to this pronounced shortage.

Historically, geriatrics has struggled to attract medical students and residents. Perceived lower compensation compared to other medical specialties, the complexity of managing multimorbidity and functional decline, and limited exposure to robust geriatric care models during core medical training often deter prospective trainees. Many medical schools and residency programs lack dedicated geriatrics rotations or integrate geriatric principles insufficiently across the curriculum, leading to a general lack of understanding or interest in the field.

Beyond specialized geriatricians, there is a profound need for all healthcare professionals – including nurses, social workers, physical therapists, and pharmacists – to possess core competencies in geriatrics. This interdisciplinary approach is essential for delivering comprehensive care to older adults. Initiatives aim to integrate geriatric principles across all healthcare curricula and promote interprofessional geriatric teams. Certification in geriatrics, offered by boards such as the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), ensures specialized knowledge, but increasing the numbers pursuing this certification remains a significant challenge. Programs like the Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) funded by HRSA aim to improve the quality of healthcare for older adults by developing a healthcare workforce that maximizes patient and family engagement and integrates geriatrics with primary care.

3.2 Nursing Education and Workforce Diversity

Nursing education pathways are diverse, ranging from Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) and Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) to Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). There is a growing consensus and movement to advance the BSN as the entry-level standard for professional nursing practice, as research suggests a correlation between a higher proportion of BSN-prepared nurses and improved patient outcomes. However, expanding BSN programs requires significant investment in faculty and clinical placements.

Efforts to enhance workforce diversity are integral to addressing nursing shortages and improving culturally competent care. Programs like the Nursing Workforce Diversity-Eldercare Enhancement (NWD-E2) initiative are specifically designed to increase educational opportunities for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, including underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities, and those from rural areas (bhw.hrsa.gov). By intentionally recruiting and supporting diverse students, these programs not only expand the overall nursing pipeline but also ensure that the workforce better reflects the diversity of the patient population. A diverse nursing workforce has been shown to improve patient engagement, reduce health disparities, and enhance the cultural competence of care delivery, which is especially critical in an aging and increasingly diverse nation.

Challenges remain, including creating more accessible educational pathways, providing financial support to students, and developing faculty diversity to serve as mentors and role models. Moreover, bridging the gap between associate and baccalaureate degree holders through ‘BSN in 10’ or similar initiatives is vital to elevating the overall educational preparedness of the nursing workforce.

3.3 Direct Care Worker Training

Direct care workers (DCWs), including certified nursing assistants (CNAs), home health aides (HHAs), and personal care aides (PCAs), form the backbone of long-term care for older adults and individuals with disabilities. Their roles are profoundly intimate and essential, involving assistance with daily living activities, medication reminders, mobility support, and companionship. Despite their critical importance, this workforce is severely undervalued, underpaid, and often lacks adequate training and career advancement opportunities.

Organizations such as the Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute (PHI) have been instrumental in advocating for and implementing strategies to improve the job quality of direct care workers (en.wikipedia.org). PHI focuses on enhancing wages, benefits, and working conditions, alongside providing comprehensive training. Effective training for DCWs extends beyond basic care tasks; it includes specialized modules on dementia care, palliative care, communication skills, cultural sensitivity, and recognizing signs of distress. Such training empowers DCWs to provide higher quality, person-centered care and enhances their professional identity and job satisfaction. However, the fragmented nature of the long-term care system, inconsistent training standards across states, and persistent low reimbursement rates for services continue to pose significant barriers to professionalizing and stabilizing this indispensable workforce. The development of portable credentials and clear career ladders for DCWs is vital to retaining them and attracting new entrants into this demanding yet rewarding field.

3.4 Primary Care Training and Innovation

Primary care is the cornerstone of a high-performing healthcare system, providing comprehensive, continuous, and coordinated care. However, the U.S. has faced a persistent shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs) for decades, alongside an uneven distribution of existing PCPs. Factors contributing to this include the allure of higher compensation and perceived prestige in specialty fields, which often overshadow the comprehensive and intellectual demands of primary care.

Training models are evolving to address this. Medical education is increasingly emphasizing exposure to primary care settings earlier in the curriculum, promoting integrated behavioral health training, and encouraging interprofessional education. Innovations in primary care delivery, such as the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), prioritize team-based care, care coordination, and a holistic approach to patient management. These models leverage the full capabilities of diverse professionals, including Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), who are increasingly vital in providing comprehensive primary care services, especially in underserved areas. Policies that support residency slots for primary care, incentivize rural practice, and expand the scope of practice for APPs are crucial for strengthening this foundational component of the healthcare system.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Recruitment and Retention Strategies

Attracting and retaining a skilled healthcare workforce requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses both financial motivations and the quality of the professional experience. Mere recruitment is insufficient without robust retention mechanisms.

4.1 Financial Incentives

Financial incentives remain a powerful tool for attracting individuals to high-need specialties and underserved geographic areas. These incentives include:

• Competitive Salaries: Ensuring compensation is commensurate with the demanding nature and specialized skills required in healthcare professions, particularly in fields historically undervalued like geriatrics and direct care.
• Student Loan Forgiveness and Repayment Programs: High educational debt is a significant barrier. Programs like the National Health Service Corps (NHSC) offer loan repayment for healthcare professionals who commit to working in underserved communities. State-specific programs also exist to encourage practice in rural or low-income areas.
• Scholarships and Grants: Providing financial aid to students pursuing degrees in high-demand fields, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds or those committing to serve specific populations.
• Sign-on and Retention Bonuses: Lump-sum payments offered upon hiring or after a certain tenure to attract and keep staff, particularly in critical shortage areas.
• Housing and Relocation Assistance: Subsidies for housing or moving expenses can be particularly effective in recruiting professionals to high cost-of-living areas or remote rural settings.

The Eldercare Workforce Alliance, for instance, consistently advocates for increased investments in training the geriatrics health professions and direct-care workforce, recognizing that financial support is a critical component of building a stable pipeline (eldercareworkforce.org). While essential, financial incentives alone are often not sufficient for long-term retention; they must be coupled with other strategies that enhance job satisfaction and professional fulfillment.

4.2 Professional Development

Investing in continuous professional development is key to retaining healthcare professionals by fostering growth, competence, and job satisfaction. This includes:

• Continuing Education and Specialized Certifications: Providing opportunities for staff to acquire new skills, maintain certifications, and stay abreast of the latest medical advancements. This could include specialized training in areas like wound care, palliative care, or specific technological proficiencies.
• Mentorship Programs: Establishing formal and informal mentorship relationships where experienced professionals guide and support newer practitioners. This not only aids in skill development but also helps integrate new staff into the organizational culture and reduces feelings of isolation.
• Clear Career Advancement Pathways: Creating transparent routes for promotion, increased responsibility, and diversification of roles. For example, a staff nurse might progress to a charge nurse, clinical educator, or specialist role, or pursue advanced practice nursing. For direct care workers, this could mean pathways to becoming certified medication aides or licensed practical nurses.
• Leadership Development Programs: Identifying and nurturing leadership potential among healthcare staff, preparing them for supervisory and management roles. This empowers staff and ensures a strong leadership pipeline.

Programs like NICHE (Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders) exemplify this approach, offering resources to improve care for older adults and simultaneously supporting nursing staff in their professional growth through education and best practice implementation (nicheprogram.org). Such initiatives not only enhance the quality of care but also foster a sense of value and purpose among staff.

4.3 Work Environment Improvements

Creating supportive, safe, and engaging work environments is paramount for retaining healthcare professionals and mitigating burnout. This involves addressing systemic issues that contribute to dissatisfaction:

• Appropriate Staffing Levels: Implementing evidence-based patient-to-staff ratios to ensure manageable workloads, reduce stress, and improve patient safety. Adequate staffing directly impacts the quality of care and the well-being of providers.
• Work-Life Balance Initiatives: Offering flexible scheduling options, remote work opportunities where feasible (e.g., telehealth, administrative roles), and generous paid time off. Promoting policies that respect personal time helps prevent burnout and fosters a healthier workforce.
• Addressing Workplace Violence: Implementing robust security measures, de-escalation training, and clear reporting mechanisms to protect healthcare workers from physical and verbal abuse. A zero-tolerance policy for violence creates a safer environment.
• Reducing Administrative Burden: Optimizing electronic health record (EHR) systems to be more user-friendly, reducing unnecessary documentation, and leveraging technology (e.g., AI for transcription) to free up clinician time for direct patient care.
• Promoting a Culture of Psychological Safety: Encouraging open communication, recognizing achievements, providing constructive feedback, and ensuring leaders are approachable and supportive. A culture that values employee input and well-being contributes significantly to retention.
• Wellness Programs: Offering access to mental health support, stress management resources, mindfulness training, and employee assistance programs. Proactively supporting the mental and emotional well-being of staff is crucial in a high-stress environment.

By systematically addressing these environmental factors, healthcare organizations can create workplaces where professionals feel valued, supported, and empowered to deliver their best care.

4.4 Community-Based Recruitment

‘Growing your own’ healthcare workforce is an increasingly vital strategy, particularly for rural and underserved communities. This approach focuses on building a talent pipeline from within the community itself:

• Pipeline Programs: Establishing partnerships between healthcare organizations, local high schools, and community colleges to expose students to healthcare careers early on. This can include mentorship, internships, and dual enrollment programs.
• Recruitment from Underrepresented Groups: Actively targeting and supporting individuals from racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds that are underrepresented in healthcare. These individuals are often more likely to return to and serve their home communities, reducing geographic disparities.
• Rural-Track Programs: Developing specific medical and nursing school tracks that train students in rural settings, fostering an understanding and appreciation for rural practice, and increasing the likelihood they will choose to practice in these areas post-graduation.
• Community Health Worker (CHW) Programs: Investing in the training and deployment of CHWs, who are trusted members of their communities and can serve as vital links between healthcare systems and populations facing barriers to care. CHW roles can also serve as entry points into other healthcare professions.

These strategies not only address immediate shortages but also foster long-term community health resilience by cultivating a workforce deeply embedded in and committed to serving its local population.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Policy Recommendations

Addressing the complex healthcare workforce crisis necessitates a robust and coordinated policy response at all levels of government. These recommendations aim to create systemic changes that support the growth, distribution, and well-being of the healthcare workforce.

5.1 Increased Funding for Education and Training

Substantial and sustained investment in healthcare education and training infrastructure is paramount to expanding the workforce pipeline. This includes:

• Enhanced Federal Funding for Health Professions Training Programs: Augmenting funding for Title VII (physician and dental training) and Title VIII (nursing education) programs, which support various initiatives from scholarships to faculty development. These programs are critical for increasing the number of graduates in high-need areas.
• Expansion of Graduate Medical Education (GME) Funding: Increasing the number of federally funded medical residency slots, particularly for primary care, geriatrics, and behavioral health specialties. The current cap on GME funding has severely limited the ability to train enough physicians to meet demand.
• Grants for Nursing Schools and Allied Health Programs: Providing financial support for nursing schools to expand enrollment capacity, hire more faculty, and develop innovative curricula, including simulation-based training. Similar investments are needed for allied health programs that are experiencing shortages.
• Support for Faculty Development: Funding programs that incentivize experienced clinicians to transition into academic roles, including loan forgiveness for faculty and grants for doctoral nursing education, which can directly address the faculty shortage bottleneck.
• Interprofessional Education (IPE) Initiatives: Investing in programs that promote collaborative learning among students from different health professions, preparing them for team-based care models essential for complex patient needs.

The Biden administration’s investment of approximately $206 million into geriatric care training programs is a significant step, signaling a commitment to addressing the growing shortage of geriatricians and other geriatric-focused professionals (axios.com). However, this must be scaled up and broadened to encompass the full spectrum of healthcare professions.

5.2 Support for Direct Care Workers

Elevating the status and improving the working conditions of direct care workers is a moral imperative and an economic necessity. Policies should focus on:

• Increasing Compensation and Benefits: Implementing policies that mandate competitive wages, paid time off, and access to health insurance and retirement plans for direct care workers. This includes increasing Medicaid reimbursement rates for home and community-based services, which directly impacts DCW wages.
• Standardizing and Professionalizing Training: Developing national or state-level standardized training curricula and certification requirements that are robust, competency-based, and lead to portable credentials. This would enhance skill sets and create clear career ladders within the direct care field.
• Occupational Safety and Health Protections: Ensuring that DCWs are protected from workplace hazards, including adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and training on safe patient handling techniques.
• Establishing Career Pathways: Creating clear advancement opportunities for DCWs to pursue further education and transition into other healthcare roles, such as licensed practical nurses or registered nurses, through tuition assistance and bridge programs.

Initiatives like the NWD-E2 program, which aims to strengthen the eldercare workforce in rural communities by expanding opportunities for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, are crucial examples of targeted support for this vital workforce (hrsa.gov).

5.3 Policy Advocacy and Regulatory Reform

Engaging in sustained policy advocacy is critical to driving systemic changes. Key areas for reform include:

• Expanding Scope of Practice: Advocating for state and federal policies that allow advanced practice providers (NPs, PAs, CRNAs, clinical pharmacists, etc.) to practice to the full extent of their education and training, especially in states with restrictive laws. This is a highly effective, immediate solution to expand access to care.
• Interstate Licensure Compacts: Promoting and adopting interstate licensure compacts for various health professions to facilitate mobility and enable professionals to practice across state lines without undue administrative burden, thereby improving workforce distribution and responsiveness to emergencies.
• Addressing Regulatory Burden: Streamlining licensing and credentialing processes and reducing unnecessary administrative tasks that contribute to clinician burnout and detract from patient care.
• Promoting Health Equity: Advocating for policies that address social determinants of health and support efforts to diversify the healthcare workforce, ensuring that care is culturally competent and accessible to all populations.

Organizations like the Eldercare Workforce Alliance play a vital role in advocating for quality elder care and increased federal funding for geriatrics workforce training, demonstrating the power of collective advocacy (eldercareworkforce.org).

5.4 Federal and State Collaboration

A unified approach involving both federal and state governments, alongside public and private entities, is essential for comprehensive workforce planning.

• National Healthcare Workforce Commission: Establishing a permanent national commission to monitor workforce trends, project future needs, and recommend data-driven policies to Congress and federal agencies.
• State-Level Workforce Initiatives: Supporting state-level task forces and commissions dedicated to identifying regional shortages, developing local solutions, and coordinating with federal programs. Many states have unique demographic and geographic challenges requiring tailored interventions.
• Public-Private Partnerships: Fostering collaborations between government, academic institutions, healthcare systems, and private industry to develop innovative training programs, share resources, and fund workforce development initiatives. This can include partnerships for simulation labs, clinical placements, and technology development.

5.5 Addressing Systemic Issues through Reimbursement and Prevention

Beyond direct workforce policies, broader systemic reforms are necessary to create a sustainable healthcare environment.

• Reimbursement Reform: Shifting payment models to better incentivize primary care, preventive services, and value-based care over fee-for-service, which often prioritizes specialist interventions. This can make primary care careers more financially attractive.
• Investment in Public Health Infrastructure: Strengthening public health systems to focus on prevention and population health management, which can ultimately reduce the demand on acute care services and promote overall community well-being.
• Telehealth Integration and Reimbursement: Permanently extending telehealth flexibilities and ensuring adequate reimbursement for virtual care services. Telehealth can improve access in underserved areas and enhance provider efficiency, potentially alleviating some workforce pressures.

These interconnected policy levers, when strategically deployed, have the potential to transform the U.S. healthcare workforce from a state of crisis to one of resilience and abundance.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

The healthcare workforce crisis in the United States is not a looming threat but a present reality, characterized by pervasive shortages across critical sectors and exacerbated by an aging population, an experienced workforce nearing retirement, educational pipeline constraints, and widespread burnout. This multifaceted issue demands a response that is equally comprehensive and deeply integrated, transcending disciplinary silos and short-term fixes.

As this report has detailed, sustainable solutions hinge upon a three-pronged approach: strengthening the educational and training pipeline, implementing robust recruitment and retention strategies, and enacting transformative policy reforms. This includes significantly increasing funding for health professions education and training, removing antiquated regulatory barriers that hinder professional practice, and, crucially, making substantial investments in the direct care workforce that forms the bedrock of long-term care. Furthermore, fostering supportive and safe work environments, offering meaningful professional development opportunities, and leveraging financial incentives are indispensable for attracting new talent and, more importantly, for retaining the dedicated professionals currently serving on the front lines.

Ultimately, the vision is to cultivate a healthcare workforce that is not only quantitatively sufficient but also highly skilled, resilient, diverse, and adequately compensated. Such a workforce is essential to deliver equitable, high-quality, and accessible care to all Americans, ensuring that the nation is well-prepared to meet the escalating and evolving health needs of its aging and diverse population for generations to come. The time for piecemeal solutions has passed; a coordinated, urgent, and visionary effort is required to safeguard the health and well-being of the nation.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Eldercare Workforce Alliance. (n.d.). Workforce Shortage. Retrieved from (eldercareworkforce.org)

• Pulivarthi Group. (2025). Understanding Healthcare Workforce Challenges in 2026. Retrieved from (pulivarthigroup.com)

• Human Capital Express. (2024). Healthcare’s Workforce Crisis: Projecting Shortages and Strategic Solutions by 2028. Retrieved from (hcm4hro.com)

• Becker’s Hospital Review. (2024). Geriatric Care Demand Outstrips Supply. Retrieved from (beckershospitalreview.com)

• Bureau of Health Workforce. (n.d.). Nursing Workforce Diversity (NWD). Retrieved from (bhw.hrsa.gov)

• Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)

• Eldercare Workforce Alliance. (n.d.). Workforce Shortage. Retrieved from (eldercareworkforce.org)

• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2024). Biden Administration Invests in Geriatric Care Training. Retrieved from (axios.com)

• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2020). Nursing Workforce Diversity-Eldercare Enhancement (NWD-E2) Program. Retrieved from (hrsa.gov)

• Eldercare Workforce Alliance. (n.d.). Workforce Shortage. Retrieved from (eldercareworkforce.org)