Mastering the Microcosm: An In-Depth Analysis of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Its Transformative Future

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) represents a paradigm shift in modern surgical practice, moving away from extensive incisions towards techniques that significantly reduce physiological trauma, accelerate patient recovery, and enhance cosmetic outcomes. This comprehensive report delves into the intricate historical trajectory of MIS, tracing its evolution from rudimentary endoscopic explorations to sophisticated robotic-assisted procedures. It provides an exhaustive exposition of current methodologies, meticulously details their established benefits, and critically examines the persistent challenges inherent in their widespread adoption and application. Furthermore, the report ventures into the frontier of surgical innovation, scrutinizing the transformative potential of nascent technologies, including magnetic millirobots, artificial intelligence, and advanced imaging modalities, to redefine the landscape of minimally invasive interventions and usher in a new era of surgical precision and patient-centric care.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS), often colloquially referred to as keyhole surgery, embodies a diverse spectrum of sophisticated surgical techniques designed to achieve therapeutic objectives with the least possible disruption to the human body. Unlike traditional open surgery, which typically necessitates large incisions to grant direct visual and manual access to internal organs, MIS leverages small percutaneous punctures, specialized elongated instruments, and advanced high-definition imaging systems to enable surgeons to visualize, manipulate, and operate on internal structures remotely. This innovative approach has profoundly reshaped surgical paradigms since its widespread adoption, shifting the emphasis towards expedited recovery, diminished postoperative morbidity, and an overarching commitment to patient-centered outcomes and operational efficiency within healthcare systems. The profound impact of MIS extends across virtually every surgical subspecialty, from general surgery and gynecology to urology, cardiothoracic surgery, and orthopedics, offering patients a less arduous journey through diagnosis, treatment, and recuperation. This report is meticulously structured to provide an exhaustive and nuanced overview of MIS, systematically dissecting its compelling historical genesis, elaborating on its current sophisticated methodologies, articulating its demonstrable benefits, critically assessing its inherent challenges, and projecting the pivotal role that cutting-edge and future-forward technologies are poised to play in sculpting its inevitable evolution and expansion.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Historical Development of Minimally Invasive Surgery

The conceptual genesis of minimally invasive surgery predates the modern era, with foundational explorations into internal visualization emerging long before the advent of contemporary optics and illumination. The quest to peer inside the human body without extensive dissection has captivated medical pioneers for centuries, laying the intellectual groundwork for what would eventually become MIS.

2.1 Early Endoscopic Explorations: The Dawn of Internal Visualization

The very earliest precursors to endoscopy can be traced to the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Philip Bozzini, a German physician, is often credited with designing the ‘Lichtleiter’ (light conductor) in 1806, an instrument intended to examine internal bodily orifices using an external light source. While rudimentary and fraught with technical limitations, Bozzini’s invention represented a foundational step towards visualizing internal structures. Further significant advancements occurred in the mid-19th century with Antonin Jean Desormeaux, a French urologist, who utilized an endoscope in 1853 to examine the urethra and bladder, effectively coining the term ‘endoscope’. His device, though still relying on an external lamp and mirrors, marked a practical application in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

The true turning point for modern endoscopy arrived with the integration of electric light. Max Nitze, a German urologist, developed the first cystoscope in 1879, incorporating a platinum wire heated by electricity for internal illumination. This innovation drastically improved visualization within the bladder, making the procedure more practical and less traumatic. Simultaneously, the concept of exploring other body cavities began to emerge. Georg Kelling, a German surgeon, performed the first documented human laparoscopy (then called ‘celioscopy’) in 1901, observing the abdominal cavity of a dog using a cystoscope and creating a pneumoperitoneum by filtering air through a trocar. Shortly thereafter, in 1910, Hans Christian Jacobaeus, a Swedish physician, conducted the first human thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, using a cystoscope to inspect the pleura and peritoneum, respectively. These pioneering efforts, while limited by rigid scopes, poor illumination, and reliance on direct observation, unequivocally established the feasibility of internal body cavity exploration through small punctures, laying the essential groundwork for future MIS techniques.

2.2 The Laparoscopic Revolution of the 1980s

The latter half of the 20th century witnessed a transformative leap in minimally invasive techniques, primarily driven by advancements in fiber optics and video technology. The 1980s heralded a pivotal era, marked by the widespread adoption and refinement of laparoscopic surgery. While sporadic laparoscopic procedures, particularly gynecological diagnostic explorations, had been performed since the 1950s, the true revolution began with the integration of video cameras onto laparoscopes. This crucial innovation allowed surgeons to view the operative field on a monitor, freeing them from the need to peer directly into the scope and enabling the entire surgical team to observe the procedure simultaneously. This collaborative viewing environment significantly enhanced safety, improved training capabilities, and catalyzed broader acceptance.

However, the definitive moment that propelled laparoscopic surgery into the mainstream was the performance of the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal). Philippe Mouret in Lyon, France, performed this groundbreaking procedure in 1987, followed shortly by others, most notably Eddie Joe Reddick and William Saye in the United States in 1988. The immediate and obvious benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—significantly reduced pain, shorter hospital stays (often overnight versus several days), and a quicker return to normal activities compared to the highly invasive traditional open cholecystectomy—led to its rapid and enthusiastic adoption. Despite initial skepticism from some quarters of the surgical community regarding safety and efficacy, the overwhelming patient preference and demonstrable clinical advantages spurred a rapid proliferation of laparoscopic techniques across various surgical specialties. This included general surgery (appendectomy, hernia repair, colon resection), gynecology (hysterectomy, ectopic pregnancy), and urology (nephrectomy). The period from the late 1980s through the 1990s was characterized by a rapid learning curve, refinement of instruments, and the establishment of best practices, solidifying laparoscopy as a cornerstone of modern surgical practice.

2.3 Evolution into the 21st Century: Robotics and Beyond

The turn of the millennium witnessed the next major leap in MIS with the introduction of robotic-assisted surgical systems. The da Vinci Surgical System, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000 for general laparoscopic surgery, revolutionized the surgeon-machine interface. This technology provided surgeons with enhanced three-dimensional visualization, improved dexterity through articulated ‘wristed’ instruments, and tremor filtration, overcoming some of the inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopy, such as a two-dimensional view and loss of natural hand movements. Robotic assistance initially found strong traction in urology for prostatectomy, then expanded rapidly into gynecology, general surgery, and cardiothoracic procedures, offering unparalleled precision for complex dissections and intricate suturing.

Concurrent with robotic advancements, the pursuit of ‘scarless’ or even less invasive surgery led to the development of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) or Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) in the early 2000s, attempting to perform procedures through a single access point, typically the umbilicus, for improved cosmetic outcomes. Further pushing the boundaries of non-invasiveness, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) emerged as a highly experimental concept, aiming to access the peritoneal cavity or other surgical sites through natural body openings like the mouth, anus, or vagina, thereby eliminating external skin incisions entirely. While NOTES remains largely investigational, its conceptual audacity highlights the continuous drive within surgical innovation towards ever-diminishing invasiveness and enhanced patient recovery. This ongoing evolution underscores MIS not as a static set of techniques, but as a dynamic, continuously advancing frontier in surgical science.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Current Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Minimally Invasive Surgery encompasses a sophisticated array of techniques, each tailored to specific surgical contexts and offering distinct advantages. These methodologies are characterized by their reliance on advanced imaging, specialized instrumentation, and refined surgical skills, fundamentally altering the way complex procedures are performed.

3.1 Laparoscopic Surgery

Laparoscopic surgery, often considered the progenitor of modern MIS, involves performing surgical procedures within the abdominal or pelvic cavities through several small incisions, typically ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 centimeters in length. The procedure commences with the creation of a pneumoperitoneum, where carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is insufflated into the abdominal cavity to lift the abdominal wall away from the organs, creating a working space. This controlled distension is crucial for visualization and instrument maneuverability. A small incision is made, usually at the umbilicus, through which a trocar (a cannula with a sharp obturator) is inserted. A laparoscope—a slender telescope equipped with a high-definition camera (either CCD or CMOS based) and a powerful fiber-optic light source—is then introduced through this primary port, transmitting a magnified, two-dimensional image of the internal anatomy to external video monitors.

Subsequent small incisions are made in strategic locations, guided by the laparoscopic view, to introduce additional trocars. These secondary ports serve as conduits for specialized elongated instruments such as graspers, scissors, dissectors, needle holders, and energy devices (e.g., electrosurgical instruments, ultrasonic shears like the Harmonic Scalpel, or bipolar vessel sealing devices like Ligasure). Surgeons operate by manipulating these instruments externally, relying on the visual feedback from the monitor. This requires a unique set of skills, including excellent hand-eye coordination, the ability to operate in a 2D environment (lacking depth perception), and adaptation to the ‘fulcrum effect’ where instrument tips move in the opposite direction to the surgeon’s hand movements.

Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard for a vast array of common procedures. These include, but are not limited to, cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal), appendectomy, hernia repair (inguinal, ventral, hiatal), colectomy (partial or total colon removal for cancer or inflammatory bowel disease), gastrectomy, fundoplication for reflux, bariatric procedures (sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass), nephrectomy (kidney removal), adrenalectomy, splenectomy, and a multitude of gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy, myomectomy (fibroid removal), oophorectomy (ovary removal), and treatment of endometriosis or ectopic pregnancies. Its widespread adoption is attributable to its significant advantages, including reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery times when compared to traditional open surgery.

3.2 Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Robotic-assisted surgery represents an advanced evolution of minimally invasive techniques, leveraging sophisticated robotic platforms to enhance the surgeon’s capabilities beyond what is achievable with conventional laparoscopy. The most widely adopted system globally is the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.). This system operates on a ‘master-slave’ principle, where the surgeon sits at a console, typically located a few feet away from the patient, and remotely controls robotic arms that perform the surgery on the patient. The system consists of three main components:

1. Surgeon’s Console: This is the control center where the surgeon sits. It features stereoscopic viewers that provide a high-definition, magnified (10-15x), three-dimensional (3D HD) view of the operative field, offering unparalleled depth perception. The surgeon manipulates master controls (joysticks) with their hands and feet, which translate their natural hand and wrist movements into precise movements of the robotic instruments inside the patient’s body.
2. Patient-Side Cart (or Robotic Arms): This unit is positioned alongside the patient and houses several robotic arms (typically three or four) that hold the surgical instruments and the endoscope. These arms pivot at the incision sites, minimizing tissue trauma.
3. Vision System: This component houses the 3D camera and image processing unit, providing the immersive visual feedback to the surgeon’s console.

The key advantages of robotic-assisted surgery stem from its unique features. The system offers ‘EndoWrist’ instruments, which mimic and even exceed the dexterity of the human wrist, providing seven degrees of freedom. This allows for intricate maneuvers, precise dissection, and highly accurate suturing in confined anatomical spaces that would be extremely challenging or impossible with rigid laparoscopic instruments. The system also filters out natural human tremor, enhances precision through scaled motion (e.g., a 1 cm movement by the surgeon’s hand can be translated into a 1 mm movement by the instrument tip), and provides ergonomic benefits for the surgeon, reducing fatigue during long and complex procedures by allowing them to operate from a comfortable seated position. The superior 3D visualization and enhanced dexterity are particularly beneficial for complex procedures requiring fine dissection and extensive suturing.

Robotic assistance has found widespread application across numerous surgical specialties. It has become a standard approach for radical prostatectomy in urology, partial nephrectomy, and pyeloplasty. In gynecology, it is commonly employed for complex hysterectomies, myomectomies, sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse, and endometriosis excision. In general surgery, robotic platforms are increasingly utilized for colorectal resections, foregut surgery (e.g., hiatal hernia repair, gastrectomy), and pancreatic or liver resections. It is also gaining traction in cardiothoracic surgery for lobectomies and certain cardiac procedures. While offering significant advantages in precision and maneuverability, robotic surgery is associated with higher initial capital costs, ongoing maintenance expenses, and requires specialized, extensive training for the surgical team.

3.3 Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) / Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS)

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS), also known as Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS), represents a further attempt to reduce the invasiveness and improve the cosmetic outcome of laparoscopic procedures by consolidating all instrument entry points into a single, typically larger, incision. This incision is most commonly made within the umbilicus (belly button) to effectively hide the resulting scar within the natural folds of the navel, rendering the surgery virtually ‘scarless’ from a visible perspective.

Instead of multiple separate trocars, SILS procedures utilize a specialized multi-port device that is inserted through a single incision. This device typically contains multiple channels for the camera (laparoscope) and various instruments. To overcome the inherent challenges of operating through a single point of access—namely, instrument clashing, limited triangulation (the optimal angle for instrument manipulation), and a restricted range of motion—SILS often employs specialized, pre-bent, or articulating instruments. Flexible endoscopes are also sometimes utilized to provide better visualization around instruments that would otherwise obstruct the view. The surgeon must develop proficiency in maneuvering instruments in parallel and compensating for the lack of triangulation that is standard in conventional multi-port laparoscopy.

The primary advantages of SILS include superior cosmetic outcomes, as the scar is either concealed or minimized. There is also a theoretical reduction in incisional pain and fewer potential port-site complications such as incisional hernias or nerve damage associated with multiple puncture sites. SILS has been successfully applied to a variety of procedures, including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, gastric banding (as noted in reference 8), colectomy, and nephrectomy. However, despite its cosmetic appeal, SILS generally presents a steeper learning curve for surgeons due to the technical challenges of instrument crowding and loss of optimal working angles. Its suitability is often dependent on patient factors, such as body habitus, and the complexity of the specific pathology, making careful patient selection paramount.

3.4 Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is arguably the most radical departure from traditional surgical access, representing the ultimate quest for scarless surgery. The core principle of NOTES is to gain access to the abdominal cavity or other anatomical spaces through existing natural body openings, thereby completely eliminating external skin incisions. This concept aims to significantly reduce postoperative pain, minimize the risk of wound infections and hernias, and potentially accelerate recovery even further than conventional MIS techniques.

NOTES procedures typically involve advancing a flexible endoscope, similar to those used in diagnostic endoscopy (e.g., colonoscopy or gastroscopy), through an orifice such as the mouth (transgastric, transesophageal), anus (transcolonic, transrectal), vagina (transvaginal), or urethra (transurethral). Once inside the lumen, a small incision is made in the wall of the organ (e.g., stomach, colon, vagina) to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Surgical maneuvers are then performed using instruments passed through the endoscope’s working channels. Upon completion of the procedure, the incision in the organ wall must be meticulously closed to prevent leakage of contents and subsequent infection (e.g., peritonitis).

While the theoretical benefits of NOTES are compelling—including no visible scars, potentially reduced pain, and rapid recovery—the technique faces significant practical and safety challenges, which have largely limited its widespread clinical adoption. These challenges include:

• Infection Risk: The inherent risk of infection from contaminating the sterile peritoneal cavity with luminal contents (e.g., from the gastrointestinal tract).
• Organ Wall Closure: Secure and reliable closure of the visceral incision is technically challenging and critical to prevent life-threatening leaks.
• Orientation and Instrument Manipulation: Surgeons face difficulties with precise orientation and triangulation in a flexible endoscopic environment, making complex dissection and suturing extremely challenging.
• Specialized Instrumentation: The need for highly specialized, flexible, and miniaturized instruments that can pass through narrow endoscope channels and perform complex tasks.
• Safety and Efficacy: Long-term safety and efficacy are still under rigorous investigation, and the risk-benefit profile for most NOTES procedures has yet to conclusively demonstrate superiority over established laparoscopic or robotic approaches.

Despite these hurdles, certain NOTES procedures have seen limited clinical application, such as transvaginal cholecystectomy and appendectomy, particularly in female patients. Research continues into developing advanced endoscopic platforms, better closure devices, and hybrid approaches (e.g., endo-laparoscopic, where a single laparoscopic port assists a natural orifice approach) to overcome current limitations. NOTES remains primarily an investigational technique, emblematic of the continuous drive towards less invasive and scarless surgery.

3.5 Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

While not strictly ‘surgery’ in the traditional sense involving external incisions, EMR and ESD are advanced endoscopic techniques that blur the lines with MIS by enabling the curative removal of early-stage gastrointestinal cancers and pre-malignant lesions without external incisions or full surgical resection. These procedures are performed entirely through a flexible endoscope introduced via natural orifices (mouth or anus).

• Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR): This technique involves injecting a fluid (e.g., saline with methylene blue) into the submucosal layer beneath the lesion to lift it away from the muscular layer. The raised lesion is then resected using a snare and electrosurgery through the endoscope. EMR is typically used for smaller, superficial lesions confined to the mucosa, commonly found in the esophagus (e.g., Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia), stomach, or colon.
• Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): ESD is a more advanced and technically demanding procedure designed for larger and more complex superficial lesions, including those that might extend into the submucosal layer but have a low risk of lymph node metastasis. After submucosal injection, a specialized electrocautery knife is used to precisely dissect the lesion circumferentially and then underneath, removing it en bloc. This en bloc resection allows for more accurate pathological assessment of the margins, crucial for determining curative resection. ESD is particularly prevalent in East Asia for early gastric and colorectal cancers.

Both EMR and ESD offer significant advantages over surgical resection for appropriate lesions, including avoiding laparotomy, reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, preservation of organ function, and faster recovery. They represent a significant advancement in the minimally invasive management of early gastrointestinal neoplasms, requiring highly specialized endoscopic skills.

3.6 Advanced Instrumentation: Energy Devices and Vision Systems

The success and safety of modern MIS techniques heavily rely on the continuous development of sophisticated instrumentation and enhanced vision systems. Beyond basic graspers and scissors, energy devices are critical for dissection and hemostasis (stopping bleeding).

• Electrosurgery: Monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical units are ubiquitous. Monopolar energy cuts and coagulates by passing current through the patient to a return electrode, while bipolar energy confines the current between two electrodes on the instrument tips, offering safer and more precise coagulation, especially near delicate structures.
• Ultrasonic Devices: Instruments like the Harmonic Scalpel utilize high-frequency ultrasonic vibrations to simultaneously cut and coagulate tissue. They generate less heat than electrosurgery, minimizing thermal spread and preserving adjacent tissue, which is particularly advantageous near nerves or blood vessels.
• Vessel Sealing Devices: Technologies such as LigaSure utilize controlled bipolar energy and pressure to create permanent, strong seals on vessels up to 7mm in diameter, often eliminating the need for sutures or clips, thereby streamlining procedures and reducing operative time.
• Advanced Vision Systems: Beyond the 3D HD vision in robotic systems, conventional laparoscopic cameras have evolved to offer better resolution, improved color rendition, and enhanced light sensitivity, providing clearer views in challenging surgical environments. The development of flexible tip laparoscopes and specialized angled scopes (e.g., 30-degree, 45-degree) also allows surgeons to ‘look around corners’ within the body, expanding their field of view and maneuverability. Additionally, some systems incorporate image enhancement technologies like virtual chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging to highlight specific tissue characteristics or vascular patterns, aiding in the identification of lesions or critical structures.

These technological advancements in instrumentation and visualization are continuous, driven by the imperative to make MIS safer, more efficient, and applicable to an even broader range of complex surgical scenarios.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Established Benefits of Minimally Invasive Surgery

The widespread adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery across diverse surgical disciplines is a direct consequence of its compelling and well-documented advantages over traditional open surgical approaches. These benefits collectively contribute to superior patient outcomes, reduced healthcare burdens, and an overall enhanced patient experience.

4.1 Reduced Trauma and Blood Loss

One of the most significant benefits of MIS is the substantial reduction in physiological trauma to the patient’s body. Traditional open surgery necessitates large incisions that transect multiple layers of muscle, fascia, and skin, leading to extensive tissue dissection and manipulation. In contrast, MIS employs small ‘keyhole’ incisions, typically just millimeters to a few centimeters in length, through which specialized instruments are inserted. This minimal disruption of the abdominal or thoracic wall musculature and connective tissues results in significantly less tissue damage.

Physiologically, this translates into a cascade of positive effects. Less tissue trauma leads to a diminished inflammatory response, characterized by lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. This reduced systemic stress response is crucial for patient recovery, as excessive inflammation can contribute to postoperative pain, fatigue, and organ dysfunction. Furthermore, the precise nature of MIS, coupled with excellent visualization (often magnified), allows surgeons to identify and cauterize or seal blood vessels more effectively, leading to considerably less intraoperative blood loss. For example, a laparoscopic colectomy typically involves significantly less blood loss compared to its open counterpart, thereby reducing the need for blood transfusions and their associated risks. This conservation of physiological reserves is particularly beneficial for elderly or comorbid patients, contributing to a more stable postoperative course and faster recuperation.

4.2 Decreased Postoperative Pain

The direct correlation between reduced tissue trauma and decreased postoperative pain is a hallmark advantage of MIS. Smaller incisions inherently cause less damage to somatic nerves and muscle fibers, which are primary sources of pain signals. Unlike open surgery where large incisions can lead to prolonged pain and discomfort requiring significant analgesic use, patients undergoing MIS often experience milder, more localized pain. This reduced pain intensity translates into several benefits:

• Lower Opioid Requirements: Patients require less potent and fewer opioid analgesics, thereby mitigating the risk of opioid-related side effects such as nausea, constipation, sedation, and the potential for prolonged opioid dependence.
• Earlier Ambulation: Less pain facilitates earlier mobilization and ambulation, which is vital for preventing postoperative complications like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and pneumonia. Early ambulation also stimulates bowel function, reducing the incidence of postoperative ileus.
• Improved Patient Comfort and Satisfaction: A more comfortable recovery directly contributes to higher patient satisfaction and a more positive overall surgical experience.

4.3 Shorter Hospital Stays and Faster Recovery

The confluence of reduced trauma, decreased pain, and lower complication rates directly contributes to a significantly accelerated recovery trajectory for MIS patients. Patients can often be discharged from the hospital much sooner than their open surgery counterparts, leading to shorter hospital stays. For instance, while a traditional open hysterectomy might necessitate a hospital stay of 3-5 days and a recovery period of 6 to 8 weeks, a minimally invasive hysterectomy can often reduce the hospital stay to 1-2 days and the recovery period to just 3 to 4 weeks, enabling a quicker return to normal activities and employment [2]. Similarly, patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy are frequently discharged within 24 hours and can resume light activities within a few days, a stark contrast to the week-long hospital stays and prolonged convalescence often associated with open procedures.

From a healthcare system perspective, shorter hospital stays translate into significant cost savings, freeing up hospital beds and resources. For patients, a faster recovery means a quicker return to their personal and professional lives, minimizing disruption and economic impact. This efficiency has become a critical factor in modern healthcare delivery, contributing to higher throughput and better resource utilization.

4.4 Improved Cosmetic Outcomes

For many patients, particularly those undergoing elective procedures, cosmetic outcomes are a significant consideration. MIS, with its reliance on small incisions, leaves behind significantly less noticeable scarring compared to the large, often prominent scars from open surgery. This is particularly relevant for procedures performed on visible areas or for younger patients.

Beyond aesthetics, smaller incisions are less prone to certain wound complications such as keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring. The psychological benefit of a minimal or concealed scar can profoundly enhance a patient’s self-image and quality of life post-surgery, contributing positively to their overall satisfaction with the surgical outcome.

4.5 Reduced Risk of Complications

While no surgical procedure is entirely risk-free, MIS techniques have demonstrably reduced the incidence of several common postoperative complications associated with open surgery. These include:

• Wound Infections: Smaller incisions are less susceptible to infection, primarily due to less exposure to environmental contaminants and reduced tissue devitalization. The reduced length of the incision also provides fewer opportunities for bacterial ingress.
• Incisional Hernias: Large abdominal incisions carry a considerable risk of developing incisional hernias post-operatively, requiring potential re-operation. The small, often meticulously closed, port sites in MIS significantly reduce this risk.
• Postoperative Ileus: The reduced manipulation of bowel loops during MIS, coupled with less systemic inflammation, often leads to earlier return of bowel function, minimizing the discomfort and delayed discharge associated with postoperative ileus.
• Respiratory Complications: With smaller abdominal incisions, patients experience less pain with deep breathing and coughing, which allows for better lung expansion and secretion clearance. This significantly reduces the risk of atelectasis and pneumonia, particularly in elderly or pulmonary-compromised patients.

These reductions in complication rates contribute to a safer surgical journey and a more predictable recovery for patients.

4.6 Enhanced Surgeon Visualization and Ergonomics (Robotic/Advanced Laparoscopy)

While traditional laparoscopy initially presented challenges with 2D visualization and ergonomic strain, advancements, particularly with robotic-assisted platforms, have transformed these aspects into significant benefits for the surgeon. Robotic systems provide a highly magnified (up to 15x), high-definition, three-dimensional view of the operative field. This immersive visualization dramatically enhances depth perception, allowing surgeons to differentiate tissue planes, identify delicate anatomical structures (like nerves and small vessels), and perform dissections with unprecedented precision. The ability to ‘see’ in 3D in a highly magnified field can surpass the limitations of the naked eye in open surgery.

Furthermore, robotic platforms offer significant ergonomic advantages. Surgeons operate from a comfortable, seated position at a console, eliminating the physical strain associated with standing for prolonged periods in awkward postures during open or even conventional laparoscopic surgery. The master controls are designed to mimic natural hand and wrist movements, reducing fatigue and musculoskeletal stress. This improved ergonomics can potentially extend a surgeon’s career longevity and enhance their focus and performance during lengthy and complex procedures, ultimately benefiting patient safety and outcomes. Even in conventional laparoscopy, continuous improvements in camera technology, monitor resolution, and instrument design have significantly enhanced the visual and tactile experience for the surgeon.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Challenges in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Despite the undeniable advantages and widespread adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery, its implementation and continued advancement are not without significant hurdles. These challenges span technical, economic, and logistical domains, demanding ongoing innovation, training, and strategic resource allocation.

5.1 Technical Complexity and Learning Curve

The transition from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques demands a fundamental shift in surgical skills and an often steep learning curve for surgeons. Unlike open surgery where surgeons directly visualize, palpate, and manipulate tissues with their hands, MIS requires a different set of competencies:

• Indirect Vision and Hand-Eye Coordination: Surgeons must operate while looking at a two-dimensional (in conventional laparoscopy) or three-dimensional (in robotic surgery) monitor, dissociating their hands from the operative field. This requires exceptional hand-eye coordination and the ability to interpret spatial relationships from a screen.
• Loss of Tactile Feedback (Haptics): In open surgery, tactile sensation allows surgeons to differentiate tissue textures, identify anatomical structures, feel the tension in sutures, and detect subtle abnormalities. MIS instruments, particularly rigid laparoscopic ones, transmit very little or no haptic feedback. Surgeons must compensate by relying heavily on visual cues and the perceived resistance of instruments, which can be challenging and increase the risk of inadvertent tissue damage or excessive force application.
• Fulcrum Effect and Dexterity: In traditional laparoscopy, instruments inserted through fixed ports pivot at the abdominal wall, meaning the tip of the instrument moves in the opposite direction to the surgeon’s hand externally (the ‘fulcrum effect’). This counter-intuitive motion requires significant adaptation. While robotic systems mitigate this with articulated instruments, the overall dexterity required for fine dissection, knot tying, and suturing in a confined space remains demanding.
• Specialized Training and Simulation: Acquiring proficiency in MIS requires dedicated training beyond conventional surgical residency. This often involves extensive simulator practice, animal lab experience, proctoring by experienced MIS surgeons, and gradual progression to more complex cases. Initial operative times for surgeons mastering these techniques can be longer, and there is an increased risk of complications during this learning phase [5].

5.2 Limited Availability and High Costs

The advanced equipment and sophisticated technology integral to MIS, particularly robotic-assisted systems, come with substantial financial implications, posing a significant barrier to equitable access and widespread adoption:

• High Capital Costs: Robotic surgical systems, such as the da Vinci platform, represent a multi-million-dollar capital investment for healthcare institutions. This initial outlay is often prohibitive for smaller hospitals or those in developing countries.
• Expensive Consumables and Maintenance: Beyond the initial purchase, there are significant ongoing costs. These include expensive disposable instruments (e.g., robotic instrument tips have a limited number of uses), specialized sutures, energy devices, and costly annual maintenance contracts. These recurring expenses contribute significantly to the overall cost per procedure.
• Training Costs: The specialized training required for surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nursing staff (often involving simulation labs, certification courses, and proctoring) adds another layer of financial burden for institutions.
• Resource Allocation: The high cost of MIS technology can strain healthcare budgets, potentially limiting investment in other critical areas of patient care or exacerbating existing healthcare disparities. While shorter hospital stays and reduced complications can offer long-term cost savings, the upfront investment and per-procedure costs can still be higher than open surgery, particularly for less complex cases [12]. This economic reality often limits the availability of advanced MIS techniques to larger, well-funded academic centers or private hospitals, thereby restricting access for a broader patient population [6, 7].

5.3 Patient Selection and Suitability

While MIS offers numerous advantages, it is not universally suitable for all patients or all surgical pathologies. Careful patient selection is crucial to ensure safety and optimize outcomes:

• Anatomical Challenges: Patients with extreme obesity may present technical difficulties due to a thick abdominal wall and excessive intra-abdominal fat, making trocar insertion challenging, limiting instrument reach, and obscuring visualization. Similarly, patients with extensive previous abdominal surgeries may have dense adhesions that make safe entry and dissection challenging, increasing the risk of visceral injury.
• Pathology Complexity: Very large tumors, extensive malignancy with significant local invasion, or diffuse inflammatory processes may preclude a minimally invasive approach due to the need for wide margins, extensive lymphadenectomy, or complex reconstruction that is more safely and efficiently performed via an open technique.
• Medical Comorbidities: Patients with severe cardiopulmonary compromise may tolerate the pneumoperitoneum (which can elevate intra-abdominal pressure, reduce venous return, and compromise respiratory function) poorly. Prolonged operative times, which can sometimes occur during complex MIS cases or during a surgeon’s learning curve, may also be less tolerated by fragile patients.
• Conversion to Open Surgery: Surgeons must always be prepared for the possibility of converting a minimally invasive procedure to an open one. Reasons for conversion include unforeseen anatomy, uncontrolled bleeding, injury to surrounding structures, inability to progress safely, or significant technical difficulties. While not a failure, conversion prolongs operative time, may negate some of the benefits of MIS, and can be associated with increased morbidity.

5.4 Risk of Complications Unique to or Exacerbated by MIS

Although MIS generally reduces overall complication rates, it introduces certain risks specific to the technique or exacerbates others due to its inherent nature:

• Visceral and Vascular Injury: Blind trocar insertion, particularly the initial entry, carries a risk of injury to underlying bowel or major blood vessels. While rare, these injuries can be severe, leading to significant hemorrhage or peritonitis if not promptly recognized and managed.
• Gas Embolism: The use of CO2 insufflation to create the working space carries a rare but serious risk of gas embolism if CO2 enters the bloodstream, potentially leading to cardiovascular collapse.
• Trocar-Site Hernias: While less common than incisional hernias after open surgery, hernias can still occur at the sites where trocars were inserted, particularly at larger port sites (>10mm).
• Thermal Injury: The use of electrosurgical or ultrasonic energy devices requires careful application. Misplaced energy or inadvertent contact with adjacent tissues can lead to thermal injury that may not be immediately apparent, potentially causing delayed perforations or fistulas.
• Lost Tactile Feedback Related Complications: As previously discussed, the lack of haptic feedback can increase the risk of inadvertently tearing fragile tissue, applying excessive tension during suturing, or missing subtle anatomical cues that an open surgeon would detect by touch.
• Specific Oncological Concerns: In certain oncological procedures, initial enthusiasm for MIS has been tempered by emerging evidence. For example, a landmark study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2018 (and highlighted by Time magazine [11]) demonstrated that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer was associated with lower rates of disease-free survival and overall survival compared to open radical hysterectomy. This finding, which challenged previous assumptions, underscored the critical importance of careful patient selection, meticulous technique (e.g., avoiding unintended tumor seeding), and ongoing rigorous evaluation of outcomes, especially in cancer surgery. It highlighted that ‘less invasive’ does not always equate to ‘better’ in all contexts and that the oncological principles must never be compromised.

These challenges underscore the need for rigorous surgeon training, meticulous surgical technique, and continuous re-evaluation of outcomes as MIS continues to evolve and expand into new applications.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Emerging Technologies in Minimally Invasive Surgery

The landscape of Minimally Invasive Surgery is in a state of continuous, rapid evolution, fueled by breakthroughs in engineering, robotics, artificial intelligence, and materials science. These emerging technologies promise to overcome existing limitations, enhance precision, broaden the scope of MIS, and ultimately usher in an era of even less invasive and more effective surgical interventions.

6.1 Magnetic Millirobots

Magnetic millirobots represent a groundbreaking frontier in MIS, offering the potential for unparalleled maneuverability and access within the human body, potentially even eliminating the need for traditional incisions altogether. These tiny, untethered devices are typically a few millimeters in size and are designed to navigate complex anatomical pathways under external magnetic control.

Concept and Mechanism: The fundamental principle involves manipulating ferromagnetic or magnetically responsive robots using external magnetic fields. These fields can be generated by large-scale electromagnetic coils (e.g., Helmholtz coils) or by smaller, more localized permanent magnets. By precisely controlling the strength and direction of these external fields, operators can dictate the robot’s movement, orientation, and even exert force at a distance. The potential for such remote control is transformative, enabling access to areas difficult or impossible to reach with current rigid or flexible instruments.

Capabilities and Potential Applications:

• Instrument Delivery: As demonstrated by Jeon et al. (2025), a ‘convoy’ of magnetic millirobots can be designed to transport endoscopic instruments through complex anatomical conduits to a target surgical site [1]. This could mean delivering a biopsy tool, a small camera, or even a therapeutic device to an area without requiring a large incision or multiple ports. This effectively turns the millirobots into intelligent, self-propelling ‘surgical porters’.
• Targeted Therapies: Millirobots could be engineered to carry and precisely deliver drugs (e.g., chemotherapy directly to a tumor), gene therapies, or even localized energy (e.g., for thermal ablation) to specific tissues, minimizing systemic side effects.
• Localized Diagnostics and Imaging: Equipped with miniature sensors or cameras, they could perform highly localized diagnostic imaging (e.g., in the gastrointestinal tract, blood vessels) or collect tissue samples (biopsy) from hard-to-reach lesions.
• Tissue Manipulation and Dissection: Future iterations might incorporate miniature grippers or cutting tools, enabling them to perform intricate tissue manipulation, retraction, or even dissection within confined spaces.
• Endoluminal Procedures: The ability to navigate through lumens (e.g., GI tract, vascular system, respiratory tree) without external incisions opens up vast possibilities for endoluminal surgery, diagnostics, and therapy.

Challenges: Despite their immense promise, magnetic millirobots face significant challenges, including precise navigation and control in complex, dynamic physiological environments (e.g., peristalsis, blood flow), power supply for internal functions, biocompatibility and safety, efficient force generation for surgical tasks, and regulatory hurdles for clinical translation. However, ongoing research is rapidly addressing these issues, positioning millirobots as a potentially revolutionary component of future minimally invasive interventions.

6.2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) into MIS is poised to fundamentally transform surgical precision, decision-making, and training. AI algorithms possess the capacity to analyze vast datasets, identify complex patterns, and make predictions or recommendations that can augment human surgical capabilities [7].

Potential Applications:

• Pre-operative Planning and Patient Selection: AI algorithms can analyze patient imaging (CT, MRI) to create highly accurate 3D anatomical models, map pathological lesions, identify critical structures (nerves, vessels), and predict surgical pathways. This enables surgeons to virtually ‘rehearse’ complex cases, optimize surgical approaches, and more precisely identify suitable candidates for MIS based on predictive analytics of outcomes and risks.
• Intra-operative Guidance and Real-Time Decision Support:
  • Image Analysis: AI can process live endoscopic or robotic video feeds to perform real-time anatomical recognition, identify anomalies (e.g., tumors, inflammation), and highlight critical structures (e.g., ureters during pelvic surgery) through augmented reality overlays.
  • Performance Monitoring: AI can analyze surgeon movements, instrument usage, and tissue interaction to provide real-time feedback, detect deviations from optimal technique, and even predict potential complications before they manifest.
  • Autonomous Tasks: While full autonomous surgery is still distant, AI could assist with specific, repetitive tasks such as automated suturing, knot tying, or tissue dissection under surgeon supervision, thereby reducing fatigue and increasing efficiency.
• Post-operative Care and Outcome Prediction: ML models can analyze postoperative patient data (vitals, lab results, activity levels) to predict recovery trajectories, identify patients at high risk for complications, and personalize recovery plans.
• Surgical Training and Education: AI-powered simulators can provide highly realistic and adaptive training environments, offering personalized feedback on technique, efficiency, and error rates, thereby accelerating the learning curve for new surgeons.
• Data-Driven Quality Improvement: By analyzing aggregated surgical data (operative videos, outcomes, complications), AI can identify best practices, uncover correlations between surgical technique and patient outcomes, and contribute to continuous quality improvement initiatives across healthcare systems.

6.3 Advanced Imaging Techniques

Continuous innovation in imaging science is critical for improving visualization, enhancing precision, and expanding the scope of MIS. Beyond standard high-definition cameras, new imaging modalities offer unparalleled insights during surgery.

• 3D Endoscopic Visualization: While robotic systems already offer 3D views, standalone 3D endoscopic systems are becoming more prevalent for conventional laparoscopy, providing depth perception crucial for intricate tasks, reducing surgeon fatigue, and potentially shortening the learning curve for specific procedures [9].
• Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR):
  • Augmented Reality (AR): AR systems overlay pre-operative imaging data (e.g., CT/MRI scans showing tumor boundaries, vascular maps, nerve pathways) onto the live surgical field, enhancing the surgeon’s perception of hidden or complex anatomy. This ‘X-ray vision’ can guide precise resections, minimize damage to vital structures, and facilitate navigation in challenging cases.
  • Virtual Reality (VR): VR is primarily used for immersive surgical training and rehearsal. Surgeons can practice complex procedures in a realistic virtual environment, refine their skills, and prepare for specific patient cases without risk.
• Fluorescence Imaging (e.g., Indocyanine Green – ICG): This technique involves injecting a fluorescent dye (ICG) into the patient, which then circulates and is selectively taken up by certain tissues or filtered by organs. When illuminated with specific wavelengths of light, the dye fluoresces, making structures visible that are otherwise difficult to discern. ICG is widely used for:
  • Vascular Assessment: To visualize blood supply to organs or anastomoses (surgical connections), ensuring adequate perfusion.
  • Lymphatic Mapping: Identifying sentinel lymph nodes in cancer surgery.
  • Biliary Tree Visualization: Highlighting bile ducts during cholecystectomy to prevent iatrogenic injury.
  • Tumor Delineation: Certain cancer types selectively take up ICG, allowing for better identification of tumor margins.
• Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Confocal Microscopy: These high-resolution imaging modalities can provide real-time, in-vivo histological information, allowing surgeons to differentiate between healthy and diseased tissue at a microscopic level without the need for traditional biopsy and ex-vivo pathology. This could guide more precise tumor resections and reduce the need for repeat operations.

6.4 Soft Robotics and Compliant Instruments

Traditional rigid MIS instruments, while effective, can be limited by their stiffness and straight design when navigating tortuous anatomies or operating in highly constrained spaces. Soft robotics offers a paradigm shift in instrument design, utilizing flexible, deformable materials that can conform to anatomical structures and potentially reduce tissue damage.

• Concept: Soft robots are typically made from silicone or other compliant materials, often actuated by pneumatic pressure. They can change shape, stiffness, and length, allowing for gentle manipulation of delicate tissues and navigation through winding lumens (e.g., blood vessels, bronchial tree).
• Continuum Robots (e.g., Surgical Snake Robots): These robots have multiple segments that can bend and articulate continuously, mimicking the movement of an elephant’s trunk. They can navigate around obstacles and reach targets that are inaccessible to rigid instruments. This enhanced dexterity and flexibility could open new avenues for single-port access or natural orifice approaches.
• Benefits: Reduced tissue trauma, improved reach and maneuverability in complex anatomies, enhanced safety, and potential for more ergonomic instrument design.

6.5 Haptics and Force Feedback Systems

Addressing the critical challenge of lost tactile feedback in robotic and even conventional laparoscopic surgery is a key area of research. Haptic feedback systems aim to restore the surgeon’s sense of touch, providing crucial information about tissue consistency, tension, and instrument interaction.

• Mechanism: These systems use various technologies (e.g., force sensors on instrument tips, haptic actuators at the surgeon’s console) to measure the forces exerted by the surgical instruments on tissues and translate these forces back to the surgeon’s hands, often through vibrations or resistance in the master controls.
• Benefits: Improved safety (preventing excessive force that could lead to tissue tearing), enhanced precision during dissection and suturing, more intuitive control, and a more natural surgical experience. Restoring haptics could significantly shorten the learning curve for complex MIS procedures and improve overall surgical outcomes by allowing surgeons to ‘feel’ the tissues they are operating on.

6.6 Tele-surgery and Remote Surgery

While not a new concept, tele-surgery is gaining renewed momentum with advancements in robotic systems and high-speed, low-latency telecommunications networks (e.g., 5G). This technology allows a surgeon to perform a procedure on a patient located hundreds or even thousands of miles away.

• Mechanism: A robotic surgical system is positioned with the patient at a remote location, while the expert surgeon operates from a master console connected via a secure, high-bandwidth network. The live video feed and instrument control signals are transmitted in real-time.
• Benefits: Expands access to highly specialized surgical expertise in remote or underserved areas, particularly beneficial for military applications or in regions with limited surgical specialists. It could also enable collaborative surgery with surgeons from different geographical locations.
• Challenges: Absolute reliance on network stability and speed to prevent latency, which could compromise patient safety. Regulatory and credentialing complexities across different jurisdictions, and cybersecurity concerns, remain significant hurdles.

These converging technologies are not merely incremental improvements but represent foundational shifts that will redefine the very nature of surgical intervention, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in the quest for ever-greater precision, safety, and minimally invasive patient care.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Future Directions and Conclusion

The trajectory of Minimally Invasive Surgery, from its rudimentary endoscopic beginnings to its current sophisticated manifestations and future projections, underscores a relentless pursuit of patient benefit through technological innovation. The field continues to be a vibrant crucible of research and development, with ongoing efforts focused on refining existing techniques, expanding their applications to an even wider spectrum of pathologies, and seamlessly integrating revolutionary new technologies.

Consolidation and Standardization: A critical future direction involves the further consolidation and standardization of established MIS techniques. As the learning curve for these complex procedures matures, there will be an emphasis on defining optimal protocols, refining training methodologies, and establishing clear guidelines for patient selection and risk stratification. This standardization aims to ensure consistent, high-quality outcomes across diverse surgical settings and reduce variability attributable to surgeon experience.

Personalized MIS: The era of ‘one size fits all’ surgery is gradually yielding to personalized medicine. In the context of MIS, this translates to tailoring surgical approaches based on an individual patient’s unique anatomy, physiological reserves, specific pathology (e.g., tumor characteristics), and genetic predispositions. AI and advanced imaging will play a pivotal role here, enabling hyper-personalized pre-operative planning and intra-operative adaptation, optimizing outcomes for each patient.

Integration of Technologies: The true transformative power of future MIS lies in the synergistic integration of the emerging technologies discussed. The convergence of AI for cognitive assistance, robotics for enhanced dexterity, advanced imaging for superior visualization, and micro- or milli-robotics for ultimate invasiveness reduction promises an era of unprecedented surgical precision. Imagine an AI-guided robotic system, equipped with haptic feedback, navigating magnetic millirobots through a patient’s natural orifice, precisely identifying a lesion with fluorescence imaging, and performing a microscopic resection—all while the surgeon supervises and intervenes only when necessary.

Training and Education Evolution: The rapid pace of technological advancement necessitates a continuous evolution of surgical training and education. Future surgeons will require extensive exposure to simulation, virtual reality environments, and AI-driven feedback systems to master these increasingly complex tools. Lifelong learning and adaptation will become even more critical to maintain proficiency and integrate new innovations responsibly. Furthermore, a focus on team-based training will be essential, as these advanced platforms often require highly coordinated efforts from the entire surgical team.

Addressing Global Disparities: A significant challenge for the future is to ensure that the benefits of advanced MIS are not limited to high-income regions. Strategies must be developed to make these technologies more accessible and affordable worldwide, potentially through modular, lower-cost systems, open-source development, and innovative financing models. Promoting local training initiatives and fostering partnerships will be crucial to bridge the current gap in access.

Patient Empowerment and Ethical Considerations: As MIS becomes increasingly sophisticated, patient involvement in decision-making will grow. Comprehensive counseling on the benefits, risks, and available technological options will empower patients to make informed choices about their care. Concurrently, ethical considerations surrounding the increasing autonomy of robotic systems, data privacy in AI-driven platforms, and the ultimate responsibility of the surgeon in an AI-augmented environment will require careful deliberation and the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks.

In conclusion, Minimally Invasive Surgery has already revolutionized surgical practice by significantly improving patient outcomes across a vast array of procedures. Its ongoing evolution, driven by pioneering research in areas such as magnetic millirobots, artificial intelligence, and advanced imaging, promises to further refine surgical precision, dramatically reduce invasiveness, and enhance recovery. However, the journey forward demands concerted effort to address persistent challenges related to technical complexity, high costs, equitable access, and continuous re-evaluation of outcomes. Through sustained collaboration among researchers, clinicians, engineers, and policymakers, Minimally Invasive Surgery is poised to continue its transformative trajectory, solidifying its role as a cornerstone of modern healthcare and ensuring that cutting-edge surgical care remains safe, effective, and increasingly accessible to patients globally.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

1. Jeon, M., Tan, X., Fischer, F., & Qiu, T. (2025). A convoy of magnetic millirobots transports endoscopic instruments for minimally-invasive surgery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19595. (arxiv.org)
2. Kernodle Clinic. (n.d.). 7 Benefits of Minimally Invasive Surgery. Retrieved from (kernodle.com)
3. Cleveland Clinic. (2023). Minimally Invasive Surgery: What It Is, Types, Benefits & Risks. Retrieved from (my.clevelandclinic.org)
4. HighSurgery. (n.d.). The benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Retrieved from (highsurgery.com)
5. Wesevich, V., & Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine. (n.d.). Overcoming challenges in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine. (gpm.amegroups.org)
6. OMICS International. (n.d.). Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques and Instruments. Journal of Medical Implants & Surgery. (omicsonline.org)
7. Los Angeles Times. (n.d.). Robotic Surgery: Benefits & Advances in Minimally Invasive Care. Retrieved from (latimes.com)
8. Wikipedia. (n.d.). SILS gastric banding. Retrieved from (en.wikipedia.org)
9. Canonica AI. (n.d.). Minimally Invasive Techniques. Retrieved from (canonica.ai)
10. PMC. (n.d.). A Comprehensive Review of Minimally Invasive Dermatosurgical Procedures. PMC. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
11. Time. (2018). Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Standard for Cervical Cancer. But A New Study Shows It’s Not Effective. Retrieved from (time.com)
12. Time. (2015). How to Surgically Reduce Health-Care Costs. Retrieved from (time.com)