Nonunion: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies Across Skeletal Fractures

Abstract

Nonunion, the failure of a fractured bone to heal within the expected timeframe, represents a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery. While the specific etiology and management strategies vary depending on the bone involved, common underlying principles govern the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of nonunion across different skeletal sites. This review provides a comprehensive overview of nonunion, encompassing the biological and biomechanical factors that contribute to its development, advanced diagnostic modalities for accurate assessment, and contemporary surgical and non-surgical approaches for achieving fracture union. We explore the complexities of bone healing biology, focusing on impaired angiogenesis, inadequate cellular differentiation, and compromised mechanical stability as key contributors to nonunion. The review also examines the role of systemic factors, such as nutritional deficiencies, smoking, and certain medications, in inhibiting bone regeneration. Furthermore, we delve into advanced imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bone scintigraphy, for evaluating the extent of nonunion and guiding treatment planning. Finally, we discuss surgical techniques, including bone grafting, internal and external fixation, and biological augmentation strategies like bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), along with rehabilitation protocols, emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches to optimize patient outcomes and restore function.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Fracture healing is a complex biological process that normally culminates in the restoration of skeletal integrity and function. However, in a significant number of cases, the healing process is disrupted, leading to delayed union or, more severely, nonunion. Nonunion is defined as a fracture that has failed to heal within a period exceeding the expected healing time for that particular fracture site and patient population, and shows no evidence of progressing towards healing. While the precise timeframe can vary depending on the specific bone and patient factors, a consensus definition often considers a period of 6-9 months without radiographic signs of progression as indicative of nonunion [1].

The consequences of nonunion are profound, impacting patient quality of life, functional capacity, and healthcare costs. Chronic pain, instability, deformity, and impaired limb function are common sequelae, often necessitating multiple surgical interventions and prolonged rehabilitation. The prevalence of nonunion varies depending on the fracture location, severity, and patient characteristics. While some fractures, such as those of the tibia and scaphoid, are inherently at higher risk of nonunion due to factors like poor vascularity or complex biomechanical environments, any fracture can potentially progress to nonunion under unfavorable conditions [2].

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of nonunion across various skeletal fractures, focusing on the underlying pathophysiology, advanced diagnostic modalities, and contemporary treatment strategies. By integrating current scientific evidence and clinical experience, we seek to enhance understanding of this challenging orthopedic condition and facilitate improved patient outcomes.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Pathophysiology of Nonunion

The development of nonunion is a multifactorial process involving intricate interplay between biological and biomechanical factors. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.

2.1. Biological Factors

The biological processes essential for fracture healing, including inflammation, angiogenesis, callus formation, and bone remodeling, can be disrupted at various stages, leading to nonunion. Key biological factors contributing to nonunion include:

• Impaired Angiogenesis: Adequate blood supply is critical for delivering essential nutrients, oxygen, and growth factors to the fracture site, promoting cell proliferation and bone formation. Disruptions to angiogenesis, such as those caused by soft tissue injury, smoking, or vascular disease, can impair the healing process and increase the risk of nonunion [3]. Inadequate vascularization can lead to a hypoxic environment, hindering the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts and impairing the deposition of new bone matrix. Furthermore, poor blood supply reduces the delivery of inflammatory mediators, growth factors, and other molecules required for the initial stages of healing.

• Inadequate Cellular Differentiation: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a vital role in fracture healing by differentiating into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts, contributing to bone and cartilage formation. Deficiencies in MSC recruitment, proliferation, or differentiation can compromise the healing process. Factors such as aging, diabetes, and certain medications can impair MSC function, leading to reduced bone formation and increased risk of nonunion [4]. Furthermore, the local microenvironment at the fracture site, including the presence of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, significantly influences MSC differentiation. An imbalance in these factors can skew MSC differentiation towards non-osteogenic lineages, such as fibrocartilage, resulting in fibrous nonunion.

• Inflammation Imbalance: The inflammatory response following a fracture is a critical initial step in the healing cascade. However, persistent or excessive inflammation can disrupt the delicate balance required for successful bone regeneration. Chronic inflammation can lead to the production of catabolic factors that inhibit osteoblast activity and promote bone resorption [5]. Conversely, an insufficient inflammatory response can impair the recruitment of immune cells and growth factors necessary for initiating the healing process. Therefore, a balanced and well-regulated inflammatory response is essential for optimal fracture healing.

• Growth Factor Deficiencies: Growth factors, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), play critical roles in stimulating bone formation, angiogenesis, and cell differentiation. Deficiencies in these growth factors can impair fracture healing and increase the risk of nonunion. BMPs, in particular, are potent osteoinductive agents that promote the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts and stimulate new bone formation [6]. Delivery of BMPs to the fracture site has shown promise in promoting healing in nonunion cases, particularly in cases with compromised biological potential.

2.2. Biomechanical Factors

Mechanical stability is a crucial determinant of fracture healing. Excessive or inappropriate mechanical loading can disrupt the healing process and lead to nonunion. Key biomechanical factors include:

• Instability: Excessive motion at the fracture site can disrupt the formation of a stable callus, preventing bony union. Instability can be caused by inadequate fixation, delayed or non-compliance with immobilization protocols, or underlying bone defects [7]. Movement at the fracture site can disrupt the delicate vasculature required for healing, hindering the formation of a bony bridge. Furthermore, instability can lead to the differentiation of MSCs into chondrocytes rather than osteoblasts, resulting in the formation of fibrocartilage and a persistent gap at the fracture site.

• Inadequate Fixation: Improper fixation techniques, such as inadequate screw placement or improper plate contouring, can lead to instability and increased stress concentrations at the fracture site. Inadequate fixation can also compromise blood supply to the fracture fragments, further impairing the healing process. The choice of fixation method should be carefully considered based on the fracture pattern, bone quality, and patient characteristics to ensure adequate stability and promote optimal healing.

• Stress Shielding: Overly rigid fixation can shield the fracture site from physiological loading, inhibiting bone remodeling and delaying union. Stress shielding can occur when the fixation device bears the majority of the load, preventing the fracture fragments from experiencing the mechanical stimuli necessary for bone formation. Stress shielding can lead to bone resorption around the fracture site and a weakening of the surrounding bone. Flexible fixation techniques or staged removal of fixation devices may be considered to minimize stress shielding and promote more physiological loading of the fracture site.

2.3. Systemic Factors

Systemic factors can also significantly influence fracture healing and contribute to nonunion. These factors include:

• Smoking: Smoking has been consistently associated with impaired fracture healing and increased risk of nonunion. Nicotine and other toxins in cigarette smoke impair angiogenesis, reduce bone formation, and inhibit osteoblast activity [8]. Smoking also reduces the availability of oxygen to the fracture site, further compromising the healing process. Patients who smoke should be strongly advised to quit smoking before undergoing fracture treatment to improve their chances of successful healing.

• Nutritional Deficiencies: Deficiencies in essential nutrients, such as vitamin D, calcium, and protein, can impair bone formation and increase the risk of nonunion. Vitamin D is essential for calcium absorption and bone mineralization, while calcium is a key component of bone matrix. Protein is required for the synthesis of collagen, the primary structural protein in bone. Patients with nutritional deficiencies should receive appropriate supplementation to optimize their nutritional status and support fracture healing [9].

• Diabetes Mellitus: Diabetes mellitus is associated with impaired fracture healing and increased risk of nonunion. Hyperglycemia can impair angiogenesis, reduce bone formation, and inhibit osteoblast activity. Diabetic patients often have impaired microvascular circulation, which further compromises blood supply to the fracture site. Tight glycemic control is essential for optimizing fracture healing in diabetic patients. In addition, the use of advanced wound care techniques and growth factors may be considered to promote healing in diabetic patients with nonunion.

• Medications: Certain medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids, can impair fracture healing. NSAIDs can inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, which is important for bone formation. Corticosteroids can suppress inflammation and inhibit osteoblast activity. Patients taking these medications should be closely monitored, and alternative pain management strategies should be considered if possible [10].

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Diagnostic Modalities

Accurate diagnosis and assessment of nonunion are crucial for guiding treatment planning and predicting outcomes. A comprehensive evaluation typically involves a combination of clinical assessment and imaging studies.

3.1. Clinical Assessment

A thorough clinical examination should include a detailed history of the injury, previous treatments, and any underlying medical conditions. The clinician should assess the patient’s pain level, functional limitations, and any signs of instability, deformity, or infection. Palpation of the fracture site may reveal tenderness, crepitus, or abnormal mobility. Neurovascular examination is also essential to rule out any nerve or vascular compromise. The presence of soft tissue defects, skin breakdown, or drainage should be noted, as these may indicate infection or underlying bone loss.

3.2. Imaging Studies

• Radiography: Radiographs are the initial imaging modality for evaluating fracture healing. Serial radiographs can be used to assess the progression of healing over time. Signs of nonunion on radiographs include persistent fracture lines, sclerosis of the fracture margins, absence of callus formation, and bone resorption [11]. However, radiographs may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle signs of nonunion, particularly in early stages.

• Computed Tomography (CT): CT scans provide more detailed images of the bone structure compared to radiographs. CT scans are useful for assessing the extent of bone defects, the presence of bridging bone, and the alignment of the fracture fragments. CT scans can also be used to evaluate the quality of the bone at the fracture site and to identify any signs of infection or hardware failure [12].

• Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): MRI is a valuable imaging modality for evaluating soft tissue injuries and bone marrow edema. MRI can be used to assess the vascularity of the fracture site and to identify any signs of inflammation or infection. MRI can also be used to evaluate the integrity of the ligaments and tendons surrounding the fracture site, which may contribute to instability and nonunion [13].

• Bone Scintigraphy: Bone scintigraphy, also known as a bone scan, is a nuclear medicine imaging technique that uses a radioactive tracer to detect areas of increased bone turnover. Bone scans can be used to assess the metabolic activity at the fracture site and to differentiate between viable and non-viable bone. Bone scans are particularly useful for detecting early signs of nonunion and for assessing the response to treatment [14]. However, bone scans are relatively nonspecific and may not be able to differentiate between different causes of increased bone turnover.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Treatment Strategies

The treatment of nonunion aims to achieve fracture union, alleviate pain, restore function, and prevent further complications. Treatment strategies typically involve a combination of surgical and non-surgical approaches.

4.1. Non-Surgical Management

Non-surgical management may be considered for certain types of nonunion, particularly those with minimal symptoms or in patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. Non-surgical options include:

• Activity Modification: Avoiding activities that exacerbate pain and instability can help to reduce stress on the fracture site and promote healing. Weight-bearing restrictions may be necessary to allow the fracture to heal without undue stress.

• Orthotics and Bracing: Orthotics and bracing can provide support and stability to the fracture site, reducing pain and improving function. Custom-made orthotics may be necessary to accommodate deformities or limb length discrepancies.

• Electrical Stimulation: Electrical stimulation has been shown to promote bone healing in some cases of nonunion. Electrical stimulation can be delivered through invasive or non-invasive methods. Invasive methods involve the implantation of electrodes directly into the fracture site, while non-invasive methods use external electrodes to deliver electrical currents to the fracture site. The mechanism of action of electrical stimulation is not fully understood, but it is thought to stimulate bone formation by increasing calcium deposition and promoting angiogenesis [15].

4.2. Surgical Management

Surgical intervention is often necessary to achieve fracture union in cases of established nonunion. Surgical options include:

• Debridement and Resection: Debridement involves the removal of non-viable tissue, such as fibrous tissue, scar tissue, and necrotic bone, from the fracture site. Resection may be necessary to remove segments of bone that are severely damaged or infected. Debridement and resection create a more favorable environment for bone healing by removing barriers to bone formation and improving blood supply [16].

• Bone Grafting: Bone grafting is a common surgical technique used to promote bone healing in cases of nonunion. Bone grafts can be obtained from various sources, including autograft (bone harvested from the patient’s own body), allograft (bone harvested from a cadaver), and bone substitutes. Autograft is considered the gold standard for bone grafting due to its osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and osteogenic properties. However, autograft harvest can be associated with donor site morbidity. Allograft provides a readily available source of bone but lacks osteogenic potential and carries a risk of disease transmission. Bone substitutes, such as synthetic calcium phosphate materials, provide a scaffold for bone ingrowth and can be combined with growth factors to enhance their osteoinductive properties [17].

• Internal Fixation: Internal fixation involves the use of plates, screws, rods, or wires to stabilize the fracture fragments and promote bone healing. The choice of fixation method depends on the fracture pattern, bone quality, and patient characteristics. Compression plating can be used to provide compression at the fracture site, promoting bone formation. Locking plates provide angular stability and are useful for treating osteoporotic fractures or fractures with poor bone quality. Intramedullary nails are used to stabilize long bone fractures and provide rotational stability [18].

• External Fixation: External fixation involves the use of external pins and frames to stabilize the fracture fragments. External fixation is often used for treating open fractures, infected nonunions, or fractures with significant bone loss. External fixation allows for staged reconstruction and provides access to the wound for debridement and soft tissue coverage [19].

• Biological Augmentation: Biological augmentation involves the use of growth factors, such as BMPs and PRP, to stimulate bone healing. BMPs are potent osteoinductive agents that promote the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts and stimulate new bone formation. PRP is a concentrated solution of platelets that contains growth factors and cytokines that promote tissue healing. Biological augmentation can be used in combination with bone grafting and internal fixation to enhance bone healing in cases of nonunion [20].

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Rehabilitation and Post-Operative Care

Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in restoring function and optimizing outcomes following treatment for nonunion. A comprehensive rehabilitation program should be tailored to the individual patient’s needs and goals. Rehabilitation typically involves a combination of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and pain management. Physical therapy focuses on improving range of motion, strength, and endurance. Occupational therapy focuses on improving functional activities, such as activities of daily living and work-related tasks. Pain management strategies may include medications, injections, and alternative therapies [21].

Post-operative care is also essential for ensuring successful outcomes following surgical treatment for nonunion. Patients should be closely monitored for signs of infection, wound complications, and hardware failure. Weight-bearing restrictions may be necessary to allow the fracture to heal without undue stress. Patients should be instructed on proper wound care and hygiene. Regular follow-up appointments are necessary to monitor fracture healing and to adjust the rehabilitation program as needed [22].

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

Nonunion represents a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery. Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies for nonunion is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. A comprehensive approach to nonunion management involves addressing both biological and biomechanical factors, utilizing advanced imaging techniques for accurate assessment, and employing contemporary surgical and non-surgical techniques to achieve fracture union. Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies for preventing and treating nonunion and to improve our understanding of the complex biological processes involved in fracture healing. The use of novel biological agents and innovative surgical techniques holds promise for improving outcomes in patients with nonunion. The orthopedic community must strive to improve the quality of life for patients suffering from the debilitating effects of nonunion. The role of AI in predicting and guiding rehabilitation from complex fracture treatment is also worthy of further research [23].

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. Enhancement of fracture healing with the diamond concept: solutions for nonunions. Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1191-202.

[2] Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD, et al. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of radiographic fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov;84(8):1181-4.

[3] Moore WR, Graves DT, Nabavi N, et al. The effect of smoking on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):239-48.

[4] Pountos I, Panteli M, Jones E, et al. Biological factors affecting bone healing. Injury. 2012 Nov;43 Suppl 2:S3-69.

[5] Mountziaris PM, Mikos AG. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2006 Sep;7(9):2558-69.

[6] Dimitriou R, Tsiridis E, Giannoudis PV. Bone morphogenetic proteins: application in fracture healing. Injury. 2005 Nov;36 Suppl 4:S20-31.

[7] Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choice of implants and implants systems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Nov;81(6):1093-6.

[8] Glaeske L, Platen P, Mühlbacher AC, et al. Association between smoking and non-union in long bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 20;22(1):1049.

[9] Willson T, Jeffery E, MacDermott J, et al. Nutrition and bone health. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 1;187(11):793-800.

[10] Bhattacharyya T, Levin R, Rozental T. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of nonunion after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 6;92(13):2275-82.

[11] Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen DJ, et al. Radiographic union score for tibial fractures: a validation study. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Feb;24(2):76-80.

[12] Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, et al. The influence of fracture healing assessment by CT scan on clinical decision-making. Injury. 2010 Jun;41(6):623-7.

[13] Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Maldague BE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone stress injuries. Skeletal Radiol. 1997 Mar;26(3):171-85.

[14] Matin P. Clinical utility of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 1988 Apr;18(2):89-112.

[15] Mollon B, Kang W, Huber JE, et al. Nonunion. Open Orthop J. 2010 Oct 14;4:17-29.

[16] Hollinger JO, Schmitz JP, McKay WF, et al. Combination bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Dec;(381):323-33.

[17] Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury. 2007 Nov;38 Suppl 4:S3-6.

[18] Rüedi TP, Murphy WM. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme; 2000.

[19] Marsh JL, Nepola JV, Wuest TK, et al. Unilateral fixators for severe open tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(3):241-8.

[20] Calori GM, Tagliabue L, Gala L, et al. Platelet-rich plasma vs. bone morphogenetic proteins in the treatment of osseous defects: a meta-analysis. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 Sep;8(3):53-63.

[21] Brosseau L, Rahman P, Poitras S, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003780.

[22] Anderson DD, Brown TD, Marsh JL. Postoperative weightbearing influences the mechanical environment of tibial fractures stabilized with external fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Aug;9(4):324-30.

[23] Zhang, X., Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation robotics: a systematic review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2023.