Abstract
The phenomenon of multi-generational caregiving, often embodied by individuals termed ‘sandwich carers,’ is intensifying globally due to demographic shifts characterized by increasing longevity and declining fertility rates. This report transcends the conventional focus on practical challenges like financial strain and logistical hurdles, instead delving into the intricate psychosocial landscape experienced by these caregivers. It explores the ways in which the simultaneous demands of child-rearing and eldercare impact caregivers’ sense of identity, their negotiation of familial roles, and their ability to maintain personal well-being. Furthermore, this report critically examines the adequacy and accessibility of existing support structures, highlighting gaps in provision and proposing nuanced policy recommendations that move beyond simple financial or respite solutions. The analysis incorporates insights from sociological theories of care ethics, feminist perspectives on gendered labor, and psychological frameworks related to stress and coping mechanisms. Ultimately, the report argues for a holistic approach to understanding and supporting multi-generational caregivers, one that recognizes the profound personal and societal implications of their labor.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
1. Introduction
The landscape of caregiving is undergoing a significant transformation, shaped by converging demographic trends: an aging global population, increasing life expectancy, and declining birth rates (United Nations, 2019). This confluence of factors is leading to a rise in what is commonly referred to as “sandwich carers” – individuals, predominantly women, who simultaneously juggle the responsibilities of raising children and caring for aging parents or other elderly relatives (Brody, 1981). While the immediate practical challenges faced by these caregivers, such as financial strain, time constraints, and logistical difficulties, are well-documented, a deeper understanding of the multifaceted psychosocial experiences of multi-generational caregivers remains imperative.
This report aims to move beyond a purely problem-focused perspective, delving into the complex ways in which the demands of caring for both children and elderly relatives impact caregivers’ sense of self, their negotiation of familial roles, and their overall well-being. We posit that multi-generational caregiving is not simply a practical challenge to be overcome but a profound life experience that shapes caregivers’ identities, relationships, and perspectives on aging, illness, and mortality. Furthermore, the report will critically analyze the existing support systems designed to assist caregivers, identifying gaps in provision and proposing policy recommendations that address the deeper psychosocial needs of this population.
This exploration will draw upon a variety of theoretical frameworks, including care ethics (Gilligan, 1982; Noddings, 1984), which emphasize the importance of relationships and responsiveness in ethical decision-making; feminist perspectives on gendered labor (England, 2005; Hochschild, 1983), which highlight the disproportionate burden of care work borne by women; and psychological models of stress and coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984), which provide insights into the individual and environmental factors that influence caregivers’ ability to manage the demands of their roles.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
2. The Prevalence and Demographics of Multi-Generational Caregiving
Determining the precise prevalence of multi-generational caregivers is challenging due to variations in definitions, data collection methods, and cultural contexts. However, several studies have provided valuable insights into the scope of this phenomenon.
In the United Kingdom, research indicates a significant proportion of adults are involved in some form of caregiving, and a substantial subset of these individuals are simultaneously caring for both children and elderly relatives. The Carers Trust (2023) estimates that millions of individuals in the UK are unpaid carers, and while precise figures for sandwich carers are difficult to ascertain, anecdotal evidence and smaller-scale studies suggest their numbers are growing.
Demographic analyses consistently reveal that women are disproportionately represented among multi-generational caregivers (Colombo et al., 2011). This reflects societal expectations and gendered norms that often assign women primary responsibility for both child-rearing and eldercare. Furthermore, caregivers often belong to specific socioeconomic groups. Factors such as income level, employment status, and access to resources significantly influence the ability to manage the demands of multi-generational caregiving (Penning & Wu, 2016). Individuals with lower incomes, limited access to healthcare, and precarious employment are particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of this role.
Importantly, the cultural context also shapes the experience of multi-generational caregiving. In some cultures, it is considered a normative and expected role, while in others, it may be viewed as a burden or a deviation from societal norms (Yeung & Fung, 2009). These cultural differences influence the availability of support, the level of social stigma associated with seeking assistance, and the ways in which caregivers perceive their own experiences.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
3. The Psychosocial Impact of Multi-Generational Caregiving
The demands of caring for both children and elderly relatives can have profound effects on caregivers’ mental, emotional, and social well-being. This section explores the key psychosocial challenges faced by multi-generational caregivers.
3.1. Identity and Role Negotiation
Multi-generational caregiving necessitates a constant negotiation of multiple and often conflicting roles. Caregivers must balance their responsibilities as parents, children, spouses/partners, employees, and individuals with their own needs and aspirations. This can lead to a sense of role overload, where the demands of each role encroach upon the others, leaving caregivers feeling stretched thin and unable to adequately fulfill any of them (Marks, 1977).
Furthermore, the experience of caring for both children and elderly relatives can challenge caregivers’ sense of identity. They may struggle to maintain a coherent sense of self amidst the competing demands of their various roles. The constant focus on the needs of others can lead to a neglect of their own personal goals and interests, resulting in a diminished sense of self-worth and a loss of identity (Erikson, 1968).
The concept of “filial piety,” prevalent in many cultures, can further complicate the role negotiation process. While filial piety emphasizes the importance of honoring and caring for one’s parents, it can also create a sense of obligation and guilt, particularly when caregivers are struggling to meet the demands of their other roles (Hamilton & Chang, 2008). Balancing the cultural expectation of filial piety with the realities of modern life can be a significant source of stress for multi-generational caregivers.
3.2. Emotional and Mental Health
Research consistently demonstrates a strong association between caregiving and increased rates of depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2003). The emotional toll of witnessing the decline of an elderly relative, coupled with the constant demands of child-rearing, can be overwhelming. Caregivers may experience feelings of grief, loss, anger, guilt, and resentment.
The lack of time for self-care and leisure activities exacerbates these emotional challenges. Caregivers often report feeling isolated and disconnected from their social networks, as they have limited opportunities to engage in activities outside of their caregiving responsibilities. This social isolation can further contribute to feelings of loneliness and depression (Gallagher-Thompson et al., 2000).
Burnout, a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by prolonged or excessive stress, is a common experience among multi-generational caregivers (Maslach et al., 2001). Burnout is characterized by feelings of cynicism, detachment, and a sense of ineffectiveness. It can manifest in a variety of physical and psychological symptoms, including fatigue, irritability, sleep disturbances, and difficulty concentrating.
3.3. Social Relationships and Support
Multi-generational caregiving can strain relationships with spouses/partners, children, and other family members. The increased stress and time constraints can lead to conflict and resentment within the family. Caregivers may feel unsupported or misunderstood by their loved ones, leading to feelings of isolation and alienation (Pearlin et al., 1990).
The availability of social support is a critical factor in determining caregivers’ ability to cope with the demands of their roles. Social support can take many forms, including emotional support, practical assistance, and informational resources. Caregivers who have strong social networks and access to support services are better equipped to manage the challenges of multi-generational caregiving (Cohen & Wills, 1985).
However, accessing and maintaining social support can be difficult for many caregivers. They may feel reluctant to ask for help, or they may lack the time or resources to participate in social activities. Furthermore, some caregivers may experience a sense of shame or stigma associated with seeking assistance, particularly if they feel they should be able to handle the caregiving responsibilities on their own.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
4. Existing Support Structures and Their Limitations
A range of support services are available to assist caregivers, including government programs, non-profit organizations, and private providers. These services typically include financial assistance, respite care, counseling, and educational resources.
However, the availability and accessibility of these services are often limited. Many caregivers are unaware of the resources that are available to them, or they may encounter barriers to accessing them, such as long waiting lists, complex application processes, and transportation difficulties (Schulz & Eden, 2016).
Furthermore, many existing support services are not tailored to the specific needs of multi-generational caregivers. For example, respite care services may be designed primarily for caregivers of elderly individuals or caregivers of children with disabilities, but not for those who are simultaneously caring for both groups. Similarly, financial assistance programs may not adequately address the unique financial challenges faced by multi-generational caregivers, such as the costs of childcare, eldercare, and housing modifications.
The inadequacy of existing support structures reflects a broader societal failure to recognize and value the contributions of caregivers. Caregiving is often viewed as a private responsibility, rather than a public good. This lack of recognition translates into insufficient funding for support services and a lack of policies that support caregivers’ ability to balance their caregiving responsibilities with their work and personal lives.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
5. Policy Recommendations
To better support multi-generational caregivers, a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach is needed. This section outlines several policy recommendations that address the key challenges identified in this report.
5.1. Enhanced Financial Assistance
- Expand eligibility for existing financial assistance programs: Current income thresholds and eligibility criteria for many financial assistance programs are often too restrictive, excluding many caregivers who are in need of support. Expanding eligibility criteria to include more caregivers would provide much-needed financial relief.
- Provide targeted financial assistance for multi-generational caregivers: Recognize the unique financial burdens faced by these caregivers by creating targeted financial assistance programs that address the costs of childcare, eldercare, and housing modifications.
- Increase funding for respite care services: Respite care provides caregivers with temporary relief from their caregiving responsibilities, allowing them to take a break and recharge. Increasing funding for respite care services would make them more accessible and affordable for caregivers.
5.2. Flexible Work Arrangements
- Promote flexible work arrangements: Encourage employers to offer flexible work arrangements, such as telecommuting, flextime, and job sharing, to enable caregivers to better balance their work and caregiving responsibilities.
- Provide paid family leave: Implement paid family leave policies that allow caregivers to take time off work to care for their children or elderly relatives without jeopardizing their employment or income.
- Offer tax credits for employer-provided caregiving benefits: Incentivize employers to offer caregiving benefits, such as on-site childcare or eldercare facilities, by providing tax credits for these expenses.
5.3. Improved Access to Support Services
- Increase awareness of available support services: Conduct public awareness campaigns to inform caregivers about the support services that are available to them.
- Streamline the application process for support services: Simplify the application process for support services to reduce the administrative burden on caregivers.
- Provide transportation assistance to access support services: Offer transportation assistance to caregivers who have difficulty accessing support services due to transportation barriers.
- Develop specialized support programs for multi-generational caregivers: Create support groups, counseling services, and educational programs specifically tailored to the needs of multi-generational caregivers.
5.4. Addressing Social Isolation and Promoting Well-being
- Invest in community-based programs: Support community-based programs that provide opportunities for caregivers to connect with others, engage in social activities, and access support services.
- Promote caregiver self-care: Encourage caregivers to prioritize their own health and well-being by engaging in regular exercise, healthy eating, and stress-reduction techniques.
- Combat stigma associated with seeking assistance: Challenge the social stigma associated with seeking assistance for caregiving responsibilities by promoting a culture of support and understanding.
5.5. Future Research Directions
This report highlights the urgent need for further research in several key areas:
- Longitudinal studies: Conduct longitudinal studies to track the long-term effects of multi-generational caregiving on caregivers’ health, well-being, and economic security.
- Qualitative research: Employ qualitative research methods, such as in-depth interviews and focus groups, to gain a deeper understanding of caregivers’ lived experiences and perspectives.
- Cross-cultural comparisons: Conduct cross-cultural comparisons to examine the variations in caregiving experiences and support systems across different cultural contexts.
- Intervention studies: Develop and evaluate interventions designed to improve the health and well-being of multi-generational caregivers.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
6. Conclusion
Multi-generational caregiving is a complex and demanding role that has profound implications for caregivers’ health, well-being, and economic security. The existing support structures are often inadequate and inaccessible, leaving many caregivers feeling overwhelmed and unsupported. To address this challenge, a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach is needed, one that includes enhanced financial assistance, flexible work arrangements, improved access to support services, and strategies to combat social isolation and promote well-being. By recognizing the value of caregivers’ contributions and providing them with the support they need, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.
Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.
References
Brody, E. M. (1981). “Women in the middle” and family help to older people. The Gerontologist, 21(5), 471–480.
Carers Trust. (2023). About us. Retrieved from https://carers.org/about-us
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing.
England, P. (2005). Separating ideology from material constraints: Why do women do so much housework?. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), 173-187.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
Gallagher-Thompson, D., Areán, P. A., Coon, D., Menendez, A., & Takagi, K. (2000). Development and evaluation of psychosocial interventions for caregiver distress. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(3), 275–296.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Hamilton, E. K., & Chang, K. (2008). Filial piety and caregiving: A comparison of Chinese Americans and European Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 23(4), 297-310.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 921-936.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. University of California Press.
Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30(5), 583-594.
Penning, M. J., & Wu, Z. (2016). Caregiving and social inequalities: A life course perspective. Journal of Aging and Health, 28(4), 563-585.
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 250–267.
Schulz, R., & Eden, J. (Eds.). (2016). Families caring for an aging America. National Academies Press.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423).
Yeung, W. J., & Fung, H. H. (2009). The role of culture in family caregiving: A comparison of Chinese and American families. Gerontology, 55(2), 156-167.
Be the first to comment