Addressing the Looming Workforce Crisis in Geriatric Care: Challenges, Impacts, and Strategic Solutions

Abstract

The United States is confronting an escalating and critical workforce crisis within its geriatric care sector. This complex challenge is defined by a profound scarcity of specialized professionals, encompassing a broad spectrum of roles from geriatricians and geriatric-trained nurses to allied health therapists, social workers, and direct care workers. Current projections paint a stark picture, anticipating a deficit of nearly 30,000 geriatricians by 2025, a figure that serves as a salient indicator of the broader systemic inadequacies. This severe shortage not only strains existing healthcare infrastructure but also profoundly undermines the nation’s capacity to deliver high-quality, comprehensive care to an exponentially growing older adult population. This comprehensive report meticulously dissects the multifaceted origins of these workforce shortfalls, delving into their profound economic ramifications and far-reaching social consequences. Furthermore, it proposes an array of integrated, evidence-informed strategies encompassing enhanced recruitment initiatives, robust retention programs, and foundational policy reforms. The overarching objective is to forge a resilient, highly skilled, and sustainable geriatric care workforce, optimally positioned to meet the escalating and evolving demands of elderly care in the 21st century.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction: The Unfolding Geriatric Imperative

The demographic landscape of the United States is undergoing a profound transformation, characterized by an unprecedented growth in its older adult population. This demographic shift, often termed the ‘silver tsunami,’ represents one of the most significant challenges and opportunities for the nation’s healthcare system, particularly within the specialized domain of geriatric care. The population aged 65 and over is projected to nearly double from 46 million in 2014 to over 98 million by 2060, comprising roughly 24% of the total population. Concurrently, the fastest-growing segment is the ‘oldest old,’ those aged 85 and above, a cohort with exceptionally complex and often multiple chronic health conditions. This demographic reality underscores a pressing imperative: the healthcare workforce must be adequately equipped, both in quantity and specialized expertise, to address the distinct needs of this burgeoning population.

The Institute of Medicine’s seminal report, ‘Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce,’ published over a decade ago, presciently highlighted the urgency of this impending crisis. It asserted that without immediate and concerted action, the healthcare workforce would demonstrably lack the capacity to meet the diverse and intricate needs of older patients in the foreseeable future. (eldercareworkforce.org) This foresight has unfortunately materialized, revealing widening gaps across the entire spectrum of geriatric care providers. The shortage extends far beyond specialist physicians (geriatricians) to encompass gerontological nurses (both registered nurses and advanced practice nurses), rehabilitation therapists (physical, occupational, and speech), social workers, psychologists, and, most critically, direct care workers (including certified nursing assistants, home health aides, and personal care aides) who provide the vast majority of hands-on assistance to older adults in various settings. These professionals collectively form the backbone of a robust geriatric care system, and their collective scarcity poses an existential threat to the quality and accessibility of care for millions of older Americans. The unique complexities inherent in geriatric care — including multimorbidity, cognitive impairment, polypharmacy, and psychosocial challenges — necessitate a workforce that possesses not only clinical skill but also specific gerontological knowledge, empathy, and an interdisciplinary approach, qualities that are increasingly difficult to find amidst the current shortages.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Unraveling the Multifaceted Causes of the Geriatric Care Workforce Shortage

The current crisis in geriatric care staffing is not attributable to a single factor but rather stems from an intricate interplay of systemic issues, economic disincentives, societal perceptions, and policy shortcomings. Understanding these root causes is paramount to developing effective, sustainable solutions.

2.1. The Demanding and Undervalued Work Environment

Geriatric care is inherently one of the most demanding and emotionally intensive specialties within healthcare. Professionals in this field are tasked with managing a complex tapestry of health issues unique to older adults, often characterized by chronic multimorbidity, functional decline, cognitive impairments such as dementia, and intricate psychosocial needs. Patients frequently present with multiple interacting conditions, requiring a holistic and highly individualized care approach that goes beyond single-organ system management. The prevalence of polypharmacy (the use of multiple medications) necessitates a keen understanding of drug interactions and age-related physiological changes, adding another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. Furthermore, geriatric care often involves navigating end-of-life discussions, managing chronic pain, and supporting patients and families through difficult transitions, all of which impose significant emotional and psychological demands on providers.

For direct care workers, the demands extend to considerable physical labor, including assisting with mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, and feeding. This constant physical exertion, often coupled with inadequate ergonomic support and high patient-to-staff ratios, contributes to a high incidence of musculoskeletal injuries. The emotional toll, often termed ‘compassion fatigue,’ is exacerbated by witnessing chronic suffering, cognitive decline, and the frailty of their patients. This demanding work environment, coupled with often insufficient resources and administrative burdens, contributes significantly to elevated burnout rates, job dissatisfaction, and ultimately, high turnover across all professional levels in geriatric care.

2.2. Persistent Underpayment and Limited Professional Pathways

A critical factor driving the exodus from and discouraging entry into geriatric care is the persistent perception and reality of underpayment and limited opportunities for career advancement. Compared to other medical specialties, geriatricians often face lower reimbursement rates for their services, largely due to a fee-for-service model that prioritizes procedural interventions over time-intensive, complex cognitive care and care coordination—hallmarks of geriatric practice. This financial disparity makes geriatrics less attractive to medical students burdened by significant educational debt, who often gravitate towards higher-earning specialties. Similarly, nurses and allied health professionals specializing in geriatrics may not see their expertise adequately compensated, particularly in long-term care settings.

For direct care workers, the situation is particularly dire. They are among the lowest-paid workers in the healthcare sector, often earning wages that place them below the living wage threshold, necessitating reliance on public assistance despite their vital contributions. Median hourly wages for home health and personal care aides are typically around $15-$17 per hour, offering little financial incentive for a physically and emotionally arduous job. (brookings.edu) Furthermore, opportunities for structured career advancement, such as clear pathways from certified nursing assistant (CNA) to licensed practical nurse (LPN) or registered nurse (RN), are often fragmented or non-existent in many facilities. This lack of professional development and growth potential fosters a sense of stagnation, contributing to high turnover and making it challenging to attract and retain dedicated individuals in these essential roles.

2.3. Pervasive High Burnout Rates

The combination of demanding work conditions, inadequate compensation, and often insufficient institutional support leads to alarmingly high burnout rates among geriatric care providers. Burnout is a syndrome conceptualized as resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed. It is characterized by three dimensions: feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion; increased mental distance from one’s job, or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one’s job; and reduced professional efficacy. In geriatric care, these symptoms are particularly acute.

Factors contributing to burnout include: excessive workloads and high patient-to-staff ratios, especially critical in nursing homes where legal battles have even ensued over minimum staffing requirements (reuters.com); significant administrative burdens that detract from direct patient care; lack of autonomy and control over one’s work; inadequate resources and equipment; and insufficient opportunities for rest and recovery. The moral injury experienced when providers feel unable to deliver the standard of care they believe their patients deserve, due to systemic constraints, is a profound contributor to psychological distress. This pervasive burnout not only compromises the well-being of healthcare workers, leading to higher rates of depression, anxiety, and substance abuse, but also directly impacts patient safety, quality of care, and overall organizational performance. Burned-out staff are more prone to errors, exhibit reduced empathy, and are significantly more likely to leave the profession, perpetuating the cycle of staffing shortages.

2.4. Insufficient Educational Pipeline and Specialization

A fundamental problem lies in the insufficient number of individuals entering and specializing in geriatric care at all levels. Medical students often receive limited exposure to geriatrics during their training, and the specialty is frequently perceived as less exciting or prestigious compared to acute care or surgical fields. Consequently, a small percentage of medical graduates pursue geriatrics fellowships. The number of active geriatricians remains woefully inadequate, with estimates suggesting a severe shortage, potentially nearing 30,000 specialists by 2025, to meet the needs of the aging population. (kaizenconsultservice.com)

Similarly, nursing and allied health programs may not adequately integrate gerontological principles into their core curricula, leaving graduates ill-prepared to care for older adults. There is a scarcity of faculty with expertise in geriatrics to teach and mentor the next generation. For direct care workers, training is often inconsistent, lacking standardization and opportunities for advanced certification or specialized skills development (e.g., dementia care, palliative care). This fragmented educational pipeline fails to produce a sufficient volume of professionals with the specific knowledge and skills required for effective geriatric care, exacerbating the existing shortages across the board.

2.5. Restrictive Immigration Policy Constraints

Immigrant workers have historically formed a vital, often indispensable, component of the direct care workforce and, to a lesser extent, other healthcare sectors in the United States. They frequently fill roles that native-born workers are less willing to undertake due to demanding conditions and low pay. However, recent shifts in immigration policies have significantly curtailed the availability of this crucial labor pool. Stricter visa approvals, reduced refugee admissions, and increased scrutiny under previous administrations have led to a marked decline in the number of immigrant workers entering the healthcare sector. (apnews.com)

The impact is particularly acute in nursing homes and home health agencies, which heavily rely on foreign-born individuals. Policies such as the ‘public charge’ rule, which allowed immigration officials to deny green cards to immigrants deemed likely to use public assistance, created a chilling effect, deterring many from seeking necessary care or remaining in the country. The protracted and complex immigration process for healthcare professionals, including nurses, also contributes to delays and limits the influx of foreign-trained talent. As noted by Time magazine, ‘Aging Americans face bleak futures unless we let new immigrants help.’ (time.com) These policy constraints have directly exacerbated staffing shortages, particularly in vulnerable communities and facilities reliant on immigrant labor, adding a significant external pressure to an already strained system.

2.6. Stigma and Societal Perception of Aging

The societal perception of aging often contributes to the challenges in attracting talent to geriatric care. In many cultures, aging is frequently associated with decline, dependency, and a loss of vitality, rather than with wisdom, resilience, and continued growth. This pervasive ageism can subtly (or overtly) influence career choices, leading students and professionals to view geriatrics as a less dynamic, less intellectually stimulating, or less rewarding field compared to specialties focused on acute interventions or younger populations. The perceived ‘glamour’ of high-tech medicine or surgical specialties often overshadows the profound personal and professional rewards of caring for older adults. Marketing and public relations surrounding geriatric care often fail to effectively communicate the unique intellectual challenges, emotional gratification, and immense social value inherent in this specialty, making it difficult to shift deeply ingrained societal biases against aging and, by extension, against those who care for the aged.

2.7. Fragmented Healthcare System and Inadequate Infrastructure

The highly fragmented nature of the US healthcare system poses significant challenges for delivering integrated, person-centered geriatric care. Older adults often navigate a labyrinth of primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, and home health agencies, with limited coordination between these disparate entities. This fragmentation makes care coordination incredibly complex and time-consuming for providers, leading to inefficiencies and potential gaps in care. Furthermore, the infrastructure to support aging in place – including robust home and community-based services (HCBS) – is often underfunded and underdeveloped. (axios.com) The reliance on institutional care over community-based options, partly driven by historical funding biases, contributes to a greater demand for staff in more intensive settings while neglecting the preventive and supportive care that could reduce reliance on institutionalization. This systemic fragmentation also complicates workforce planning and resource allocation, making it difficult to address shortages strategically across the continuum of care.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. The Far-Reaching Economic and Social Impacts

The geriatric care workforce crisis is not merely a healthcare operational issue; it is a profound societal challenge with cascading economic and social consequences that affect individuals, families, healthcare systems, and the nation as a whole.

3.1. Economic Strain on Healthcare Systems and Beyond

The severe shortage of geriatric care professionals places immense and growing financial pressure on healthcare systems. Facilities, particularly nursing homes and home health agencies, are forced into bidding wars for scarce talent, leading to increased operational costs through higher wages, sign-on bonuses, and enhanced benefits. The reliance on temporary staffing agencies to fill vacancies also incurs exorbitant fees, often two to three times the cost of permanent staff. These escalating labor costs divert financial resources that could otherwise be invested in patient care improvements, infrastructure upgrades, or technology adoption. The financial strain can also lead to reduced service offerings, or in severe cases, the closure of facilities, further limiting access to care for older adults.

Beyond direct labor costs, the economic impact extends to the broader healthcare system. Inadequate staffing levels correlate with poorer patient outcomes, including higher rates of hospital readmissions, infections, and other preventable complications. These adverse events generate additional healthcare expenditures, placing further strain on Medicare and Medicaid budgets. For instance, penalties for excessive readmissions directly impact hospital revenues, while avoidable emergency department visits increase system-wide costs. The crisis also indirectly affects the wider economy by reducing the productivity of family caregivers, many of whom are forced to reduce work hours or leave the workforce entirely to care for aging loved ones (estimated by Axios to contribute ‘$32 billion in unpaid care’ in Pennsylvania alone, for example) (axios.com). This loss of paid labor impacts tax revenues and overall economic output, representing a hidden but substantial cost of the geriatric workforce shortage.

3.2. Deterioration of Care Quality and Patient Outcomes

Perhaps the most distressing consequence of the workforce shortage is the inevitable deterioration in the quality of care provided to older adults. Insufficient staffing levels directly translate into less time spent with each patient, leading to rushed care, missed observations, and reduced personalized attention. This often results in a range of adverse health outcomes: increased incidence of medication errors, higher rates of pressure ulcers (bedsores), preventable falls, urinary tract infections, and malnutrition. The lack of consistent, familiar caregivers can also negatively impact the emotional and psychological well-being of older adults, particularly those with cognitive impairments who thrive on routine and stable relationships.

Beyond these immediate physical consequences, the absence of specialized geriatric expertise means that complex issues unique to older adults, such as subtle presentations of illness, atypical drug responses, and psychosocial determinants of health, may be overlooked or mismanaged. This can lead to delayed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment plans, and an overall decline in functional independence and quality of life. The underutilization of preventive services and proactive care planning further exacerbates health issues, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency department visits that could otherwise be avoided. Ultimately, the quality of care suffers, compromising the dignity and well-being of older adults and eroding public trust in the healthcare system’s ability to care for its most vulnerable population.

3.3. Profound Social Implications for Families and Informal Caregivers

The burden of the geriatric workforce shortage disproportionately falls upon the shoulders of families, who are increasingly compelled to assume extensive caregiving responsibilities for their loved ones without adequate professional assistance or support. Families face immense challenges in accessing quality, affordable long-term care, whether in institutional settings or through home-based services. This situation often forces adult children, spouses, and other relatives to step into roles they may be unprepared for, leading to heightened caregiver stress, burnout, and significant financial strain. Many family caregivers report reducing work hours, leaving their jobs, or declining promotions to provide care, impacting their own financial stability and career trajectories. The estimated economic value of this unpaid caregiving is staggering, often exceeding hundreds of billions of dollars annually, yet these contributions remain largely unrecognized and unsupported.

Beyond the financial and professional sacrifices, family caregivers often experience significant emotional and psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and social isolation. The ‘sandwich generation’ – individuals caring for both their children and aging parents – finds itself under unprecedented pressure. This situation also raises significant equity concerns, as caregiving responsibilities often fall disproportionately on women and minority groups, who may already face systemic disadvantages. The inability to secure professional care can profoundly impact family dynamics, leading to conflicts, resentment, and a diminished quality of life for both the older adult and their caregivers. This crisis thus threatens the social fabric by overstretching family resources and undermining the well-being of countless individuals who are simply trying to ensure their loved ones receive the care they need.

3.4. Societal Loss of Productivity and Innovation

When the geriatric care workforce is inadequate, the ripple effects extend to broader societal productivity and innovation. As family members, particularly those in their prime working years, are diverted from their professional roles to provide unpaid care, the national workforce suffers a loss of skilled labor and expertise. This can dampen economic growth and reduce tax revenues. Moreover, a society struggling to care for its elderly population may experience a decline in overall civic health and social cohesion. The moral imperative to provide dignified care for older adults reflects a society’s values; a failure in this domain can lead to a sense of collective unease and undermine trust in public institutions. Furthermore, the lack of investment in geriatrics as a specialty can slow down research and innovation specific to age-related diseases and conditions, impacting future generations. The long-term costs of neglecting this crisis far outweigh the upfront investment required for comprehensive solutions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Comprehensive Strategies for Recruitment, Retention, and Workforce Development

Addressing the geriatric care workforce crisis requires a multifaceted, sustained approach that targets every stage of the professional pipeline, from initial recruitment to long-term retention. These strategies must be integrated, collaborative, and supported by robust policy frameworks.

4.1. Expanding and Enhancing Educational and Training Programs

Strengthening the educational pipeline is fundamental to building a sustainable geriatric care workforce. This involves several critical components:

• Curriculum Integration: Medical, nursing, and allied health schools must integrate gerontological principles more robustly into their core curricula. This means not just dedicated geriatrics rotations but weaving age-appropriate content throughout all relevant courses, ensuring that all graduates possess a foundational understanding of geriatric care, regardless of their eventual specialization.
• Early Exposure: Introducing students to the rewarding aspects of geriatric care early in their academic careers, through mentorship programs, shadowing opportunities, and positive clinical experiences, can help counter negative perceptions and ignite interest in the field. Showcasing the intellectual challenges and profound human connection inherent in geriatrics is crucial.
• Interprofessional Education (IPE): Given the complex nature of geriatric care, promoting IPE where students from different disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, pharmacy, therapy) learn alongside each other is essential. This fosters team-based care skills, improves communication, and prepares future professionals for collaborative practice models that are vital for older adults.
• Faculty Development: Investing in the recruitment and development of geriatrics faculty is paramount. Incentives, grants, and protected time for teaching and mentoring are needed to expand the pool of educators who can train the next generation of specialists.
• Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Programs (GWEPs): Continued and expanded funding for programs like the GWEP, supported by the American Geriatrics Society, is critical. These programs, administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), aim to improve the quality of healthcare for older adults by developing a healthcare workforce that maximizes patient and family engagement and integrates geriatrics with primary care. They lead state and local public health planning, providing assistance in areas like cognition, polypharmacy, and mobility challenges. (americangeriatrics.org)
• Innovative Training for Direct Care Workers: Developing standardized, accessible, and progressive training programs for direct care workers is vital. This includes competency-based training, stackable credentials, apprenticeship models, and opportunities for specialization in areas like dementia care, palliative care, or chronic disease management. These programs should include clear pathways for career advancement (e.g., from home health aide to CNA, to LPN, to RN).

4.2. Enhancing Compensation and Benefits

Addressing the financial disincentives is crucial for both recruitment and retention. This requires a multi-pronged approach:

• Competitive Salaries: Offering competitive salaries that accurately reflect the demanding nature, specialized knowledge, and profound responsibilities of geriatric care professionals is non-negotiable. This involves advocating for increased reimbursement rates for geriatric-specific services under Medicare and Medicaid, which would allow providers to offer better wages.
• Performance-Based Incentives: Implementing incentive programs tied to quality metrics, patient satisfaction, and positive outcomes in geriatric care can reward high-performing individuals and teams.
• Comprehensive Benefits Packages: Beyond salary, comprehensive benefits are essential. This includes robust health insurance, retirement plans, paid time off, and access to mental health support services. For direct care workers, access to employer-sponsored health insurance and paid sick leave can significantly improve their quality of life and reduce turnover.
• Loan Forgiveness and Scholarship Programs: Expanding federal and state loan forgiveness programs for medical residents, nurses, and allied health professionals who commit to practicing geriatrics in underserved areas or for a specified duration can significantly alleviate financial burdens and attract talent. Scholarships targeting students pursuing gerontological specialties can also boost enrollment.
• Differential Pay for Complex Care: Recognizing the unique challenges of the field, implementing differential pay for professionals caring for individuals with highly complex needs (e.g., advanced dementia, multiple chronic conditions) could provide an additional incentive.

4.3. Creating Robust Career Development and Advancement Opportunities

To retain professionals and foster long-term commitment, clear pathways for professional growth and development must be established:

• Structured Career Ladders: Developing clear career ladders for all levels of geriatric care professionals, from direct care workers to advanced practice nurses and physicians, provides a roadmap for advancement. This includes defined roles, responsibilities, and compensation scales for each rung of the ladder.
• Mentorship Programs: Implementing formal mentorship programs can connect new professionals with experienced geriatric specialists, offering guidance, support, and opportunities for skill development and networking. This is particularly valuable for direct care workers who may lack formal professional networks.
• Continuing Education and Certification: Providing accessible and subsidized opportunities for continuing education, specialized certifications (e.g., Certified Gerontological Nurse, Advanced Dementia Practitioner), and advanced degrees encourages lifelong learning and skill enhancement.
• Leadership Development: Identifying and nurturing future leaders in geriatric care, through leadership training programs and opportunities to take on supervisory or administrative roles, can empower experienced professionals and create a pipeline for management positions.
• Research and Innovation: Facilitating opportunities for geriatric professionals to engage in research, quality improvement initiatives, and innovative care delivery models can enhance job satisfaction and attract intellectually curious individuals.

4.4. Fostering Supportive and Resilient Work Environments

Creating positive and supportive work environments is crucial for mitigating burnout and enhancing job satisfaction, leading to better retention. Key strategies include:

• Adequate Staffing Ratios: Ensuring appropriate patient-to-staff ratios, informed by evidence-based guidelines, is paramount for reducing workload burden, improving patient safety, and allowing staff to provide high-quality care without feeling overwhelmed.
• Burnout Prevention Programs: Implementing comprehensive burnout prevention and wellness programs, offering access to mental health counseling, stress management resources, mindfulness training, and peer support groups, can help staff cope with the emotional demands of their roles.
• Administrative Burden Reduction: Streamlining documentation processes, leveraging technology to reduce clerical tasks, and hiring administrative support staff can free up healthcare professionals to focus on direct patient care.
• Flexible Scheduling and Work-Life Balance: Offering flexible work schedules, part-time options, job-sharing opportunities, and predictable shifts can significantly improve work-life balance and reduce stress, especially for those with family responsibilities.
• Culture of Appreciation and Respect: Fostering a workplace culture that values, respects, and recognizes the contributions of all team members, from geriatricians to direct care workers, is essential. Regular feedback, recognition programs, and opportunities for staff input can boost morale.
• Interdisciplinary Teamwork: Promoting and investing in true interdisciplinary team-based care, where each professional’s expertise is valued and integrated into patient care planning, can enhance efficiency, improve care coordination, and foster a sense of shared purpose and support among staff.

4.5. Leveraging Technology and Telehealth for Enhanced Efficiency and Access

Integrating technology and expanding telehealth services can significantly augment the capacity of the geriatric care workforce, improve efficiency, and extend access to care, particularly in rural or underserved areas. (healthviewx.com)

• Telehealth and Remote Patient Monitoring: Expanding virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring devices, and digital health platforms can allow geriatric specialists to reach more patients, provide follow-up care, and manage chronic conditions remotely, reducing the need for in-person visits and optimizing specialist time. This is particularly beneficial for managing conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and even early-stage dementia.
• Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Data Analytics: Optimizing EHR systems to be user-friendly and interoperable can streamline documentation, reduce administrative burdens, and improve care coordination. Leveraging data analytics can help identify high-risk patients, predict health declines, and facilitate proactive interventions.
• Assistive Technologies and Robotics: Implementing assistive technologies (e.g., smart home devices, medication reminders, fall detection systems) can empower older adults to maintain independence longer, reducing the direct care burden. In the future, robotics may play an increasingly supportive role in tasks like lifting, mobility assistance, and companionship, though human interaction remains irreplaceable.
• Digital Literacy Training: Providing training for both older adults and healthcare staff on how to effectively use telehealth and digital tools is essential to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access to tech-enabled care.
• AI and Decision Support Tools: Artificial intelligence (AI) can assist providers with predictive analytics for personalized care plans, medication management, and identifying subtle changes in a patient’s condition, freeing up clinician time for direct patient interaction and complex decision-making.

4.6. Public Awareness and Recruitment Campaigns

Shifting societal perceptions and actively promoting geriatric care as a rewarding and vital career path is essential for long-term workforce development. Public awareness campaigns, perhaps utilizing national media and social platforms, can highlight the positive aspects of working with older adults, showcase diverse career opportunities, and challenge ageist stereotypes. Collaborating with high schools and colleges to develop outreach programs, career fairs, and internship opportunities can introduce younger generations to the field and inspire them to pursue careers in geriatrics.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Comparative Study of International Solutions: Lessons for the U.S.

Examining how other developed nations, particularly those with rapidly aging populations, have tackled similar geriatric workforce challenges offers invaluable insights and potential models for the United States. While direct transplantation of policies may not be feasible due to distinct cultural, economic, and political contexts, understanding successful international strategies can inform U.S. reform efforts.

5.1. International Approaches to Geriatric Workforce Development

Several countries have implemented innovative and comprehensive strategies:

• Canada’s Provincial Initiatives and Primary Care Focus: Canada, with its universal healthcare system, employs provincial-level strategies to address geriatric care needs. Many provinces have invested in integrated care models, emphasizing team-based care with primary care physicians often coordinating with geriatricians, nurses, social workers, and therapists. There’s a strong focus on strengthening home and community-based care to support ‘aging in place.’ Canada also has a more streamlined immigration process for certain healthcare professionals and caregivers, recognizing their essential contribution to the workforce. Some provinces actively recruit internationally trained health professionals to address shortages in specific areas.

• Germany’s Long-Term Care Insurance and Vocational Training: Germany introduced a mandatory long-term care insurance system (Pflegeversicherung) in 1995, which finances both professional and informal care. This dedicated funding stream has helped professionalize the care sector, leading to better wages and conditions for direct care workers compared to some other nations. Germany also relies heavily on a dual vocational training (Ausbildung) system for care workers, ensuring high-quality, standardized education and practical experience. Faced with its own severe shortages, Germany has actively engaged in bilateral agreements with countries like the Philippines and Vietnam to recruit qualified nurses, offering language training and support for integration. They have also focused on improving the image and working conditions of care professions to attract domestic talent.

• Japan’s Holistic Approach: Technology, Policy, and Public Engagement: As the world’s most rapidly aging major country, Japan has pioneered several solutions. Its comprehensive Long-Term Care Insurance System (Kaigo Hoken), established in 2000, covers a broad range of services for older adults. Japan is a leader in integrating technology, particularly robotics and assistive devices, into elder care to augment human labor and enhance independence. Examples include robotic suits for lifting, therapeutic robots for companionship (e.g., Paro the seal), and smart home technologies. Furthermore, Japan has developed ‘Silver Human Resource Centers’ to engage healthy older adults in part-time work, including care-related roles, leveraging their experience and addressing social isolation. The government also invests heavily in public education campaigns to promote healthy aging and foster intergenerational solidarity.

• Nordic Countries’ Universal Access and Professionalization: Countries like Sweden and Denmark are renowned for their robust, publicly funded long-term care systems, which prioritize universal access to high-quality care. Care workers in these countries are generally better paid and have a higher professional status than in many other nations, often benefiting from strong union representation. There’s a significant emphasis on preventive care, home care services, and specialized training in geriatrics and dementia care. These countries view care for older adults as a fundamental societal responsibility, reflected in their substantial public investment and comprehensive policy frameworks.

5.2. Lessons Learned and Applicability to the U.S.

The international experiences yield several critical lessons for the United States:

• Proactive, Integrated Policy is Essential: Countries that have made progress share a common thread of proactive, long-term policy planning that integrates health and social care services for older adults. This often includes dedicated funding mechanisms for long-term care, which the U.S. largely lacks.
• Value the Care Workforce: Nations that have successfully addressed shortages generally recognize and appropriately compensate their geriatric care workforce. This involves professionalizing roles, providing clear career pathways, and ensuring competitive wages and benefits. The U.S. must elevate the status and pay of direct care workers in particular.
• Interdisciplinary and Community-Based Care: The shift towards integrated, team-based care and strong investment in home and community-based services are recurring themes. This reduces reliance on expensive institutional care and promotes aging in place, a preference for most older adults.
• Strategic Immigration Policies: Countries like Germany and Canada demonstrate the benefit of strategic immigration policies that facilitate the entry of skilled healthcare professionals and caregivers, filling crucial labor gaps while ensuring ethical recruitment and integration.
• Leverage Technology Thoughtfully: While technology offers significant potential to augment care, international examples show it’s most effective when integrated thoughtfully, complementing human care rather than replacing it, and with careful attention to digital literacy and equity.
• Public Engagement and Anti-Ageism: Shifting societal attitudes towards aging and care work through public education and campaigns to combat ageism can help attract talent and foster a more supportive environment for older adults and their caregivers.

Adapting these strategies to the U.S. context requires careful consideration of its unique challenges, including a highly fragmented insurance system, significant federal-state authority divides, and diverse cultural and economic landscapes. However, the fundamental principles of adequate funding, valuing the workforce, promoting integrated care, and leveraging all available resources remain universally applicable and desperately needed in the U.S.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Comprehensive Policy Recommendations

Addressing the geriatric care workforce crisis in the United States demands a robust and coordinated response across all levels of government, coupled with strategic partnerships across the healthcare ecosystem. The following policy recommendations are designed to foster a sustainable and high-quality geriatric care system.

6.1. Federal and State Policy Initiatives for Workforce Expansion

Government intervention is crucial to expand the pipeline and capacity of the geriatric care workforce:

• Increased Funding for Geriatrics Education and Training: Congress must substantially increase funding for programs like the Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Programs (GWEPs) and other Title VII and Title VIII programs under the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) that support health professions training. This funding should be multi-year and predictable to allow institutions to plan and expand their programs effectively. State governments should complement federal efforts with matching grants and dedicated funding streams for geriatrics education within public university systems.
• Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement Reform: Policy changes are needed to reform Medicare and Medicaid payment models to adequately reimburse for the complex, time-intensive cognitive care, care coordination, and interdisciplinary team services characteristic of geriatric medicine. Shifting away from a purely procedural-based reimbursement system would incentivize more physicians and advanced practice providers to enter geriatrics. Similarly, Medicaid reimbursement rates for home and community-based services (HCBS) and nursing facility care must be increased to allow providers to offer competitive wages and benefits to direct care workers.
• Long-Term Care Workforce Development Acts: Federal and state governments should consider enacting comprehensive long-term care workforce development acts. Such legislation could provide funding for innovative training models, career ladder programs, and credentialing for direct care workers, along with support for faculty development in gerontology across all health professions.
• Immigration Policy Reform: The federal government should revise immigration policies to create more streamlined and accessible pathways for foreign-trained healthcare professionals and direct care workers. This includes increasing visa quotas for these critical professions, addressing green card backlogs, and ensuring fair and ethical recruitment practices. Expedited processing for those filling critically underserved geriatric care roles would be a significant step.
• Support for Research: Increased federal funding for the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and other agencies is vital to support research into workforce strategies, effective care models for older adults, and innovations in geriatric care delivery.

6.2. Incentivizing Geriatric Specialization and Retention

To actively steer healthcare professionals towards geriatrics and retain them within the field, targeted incentives are essential:

• Student Loan Forgiveness Programs: Expanding existing loan forgiveness programs and creating new ones specifically for physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals who specialize in geriatrics and commit to practicing in areas with high needs or in specific geriatric settings (e.g., nursing homes, rural areas) can significantly reduce financial disincentives.
• Scholarships and Stipends: Offering competitive scholarships and training stipends for students pursuing degrees or certifications in gerontology, gerontological nursing, and other geriatric-focused specialties can attract talent at earlier stages of their education.
• Tax Credits: Implementing federal and state tax credits for healthcare professionals who specialize in geriatrics or work in long-term care settings could provide a tangible financial benefit, recognizing the challenging nature of the work.
• Residency and Fellowship Support: Providing additional federal funding for geriatrics residency and fellowship positions, along with incentives for academic medical centers to establish and expand these programs, is crucial for growing the specialist physician workforce.
• Professional Development Grants: Offering grants or subsidies for continuing education, specialized certifications, and advanced degrees for current geriatric care professionals can support their ongoing professional growth and enhance retention.

6.3. Strengthening Community-Based Care Models and Family Support

Investing in models that allow older adults to age in place, supported by their communities and families, can alleviate pressure on institutional settings and improve quality of life:

• Expanded Funding for Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS): Federal and state governments must significantly increase funding for Medicaid HCBS programs. This includes expanding the types of services covered, increasing reimbursement rates to attract and retain workers, and reducing waiting lists for eligible individuals. (axios.com) The aim should be to rebalance long-term care spending from institutional care to community-based options.
• Support for Family Caregivers: Implementing policies that directly support informal family caregivers is critical. This includes expanding access to respite care services, offering financial stipends or tax credits for caregiving, providing comprehensive training and education on caregiving skills, and promoting flexible work policies for employed caregivers. The Recognize, Assist, Include, Support, and Engage (RAISE) Family Caregivers Act should be fully funded and implemented.
• Expanding PACE (Programs of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly): The PACE model, which provides comprehensive medical and social services to frail older adults who wish to remain in their homes, should be expanded nationally. This integrated model has a proven track record of improving outcomes and reducing costs.
• Age-Friendly Health Systems and Communities: Federal and state initiatives should encourage and support the development of ‘age-friendly’ health systems and communities. This involves promoting evidence-based care in all clinical encounters, engaging older adults and their families in care decisions, and creating environments that support healthy aging through infrastructure, transportation, and social programs.

6.4. Regulatory and Systemic Reforms

Addressing systemic barriers and refining regulatory frameworks can also enhance workforce capacity and efficiency:

• Review of Scope of Practice Laws: State legislatures should review and update scope of practice laws for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs) to allow them to practice to the full extent of their education and training, particularly in geriatric care settings where physician shortages are acute.
• Reduce Administrative Burdens: Government agencies and healthcare organizations should collaborate to streamline documentation requirements and reduce administrative burdens that consume valuable time for healthcare professionals, diverting them from direct patient care.
• Modernize Licensure Portability: Efforts to facilitate interstate licensure portability for healthcare professionals, especially in geriatric specialties, can help deploy providers more flexibly to areas of greatest need.
• Quality Metrics that Value Geriatric Care: Develop and implement quality metrics for healthcare organizations that specifically account for the unique aspects of geriatric care, incentivizing person-centered care, functional outcomes, and caregiver support, rather than solely focusing on acute care metrics.
• Strategic Public-Private Partnerships: Foster greater collaboration between government, academic institutions, healthcare providers, and the private sector (e.g., technology companies, long-term care providers) to jointly address workforce development, innovation, and funding challenges.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion: A Moral Imperative for a Sustainable Future

The United States stands at a critical juncture concerning its capacity to care for its rapidly aging population. The geriatric care workforce crisis is not an abstract future threat but a present reality, characterized by severe shortages across all professional levels, from specialized physicians to the vital frontline direct care workers. This crisis is a direct consequence of a complex interplay of factors: demanding work environments, inadequate compensation, insufficient educational pipelines, restrictive immigration policies, societal ageism, and a fragmented healthcare system. Its ramifications are profound, imposing significant economic strains on healthcare systems, leading to a demonstrable deterioration in the quality of care for older adults, and placing immense social, emotional, and financial burdens on families and informal caregivers.

Addressing this looming crisis necessitates immediate, comprehensive, and collaborative action. There is a moral imperative to ensure that older adults, who have contributed immeasurably to our society, receive the high-quality, compassionate, and dignified care they deserve. This report proposes an integrated framework for change, emphasizing a multi-pronged approach:

1. Strengthening the Educational Pipeline: Through expanded and enhanced geriatrics training programs, early exposure, interprofessional education, and robust faculty development.
2. Professionalizing the Workforce: By implementing competitive compensation structures, comprehensive benefits, and clear career development pathways for all geriatric care providers.
3. Fostering Supportive Work Environments: By addressing burnout, ensuring adequate staffing, and promoting a culture of respect and well-being.
4. Leveraging Technology and Innovation: Strategically integrating telehealth, assistive technologies, and data analytics to augment human care and improve efficiency.
5. Adopting Proactive Policy Reforms: Encompassing increased federal and state funding for education and services, modernizing reimbursement models, reforming immigration policies, and bolstering community-based care and family caregiver support.
6. Learning from International Best Practices: Adapting successful strategies from nations that have proactively addressed similar demographic shifts.

Building a sustainable, skilled geriatric care workforce is not merely a healthcare policy objective; it is a societal investment in the well-being of our elders and, by extension, in the health and vitality of the nation as a whole. Collaborative efforts among healthcare providers, policymakers, educational institutions, community organizations, and the broader public are essential. Only through such concerted and sustained action can the United States ensure that its aging population receives the quality care it needs and truly deserves, forging a more resilient and compassionate future for all.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• American Geriatrics Society. (2025, July 14). Letters to House and Senate Appropriations Leadership on FY 2026 Funding for Geriatrics Workforce Training Programs. Retrieved from (americangeriatrics.org)
• Associated Press. (2025, July 17). Nursing homes struggle with Trump’s immigration crackdown. Retrieved from (apnews.com)
• Axios. (2025, May 22). Pennsylvania’s ‘invisible workforce’ provides $32 billion in unpaid care. Retrieved from (axios.com)
• Axios. (2025, October 29). Disability services staffing squeezed as Medicaid cuts loom. Retrieved from (axios.com)
• Brookings Institute. (n.d.). Chart: Home health and personal care aides are among the lowest-paid workers in the healthcare sector. Retrieved from (brookings.edu)
• Eldercare Workforce Alliance. (n.d.). Workforce Shortage. Retrieved from (eldercareworkforce.org)
• HealthViewX. (2024). Addressing the Healthcare Workforce Shortage: Solutions for the Future. Retrieved from (healthviewx.com)
• HealthWorks Collective. (2023). How To Overcome Staffing Shortages In Senior Homes. Retrieved from (healthworkscollective.com)
• Kaizen Consulting Service. (2025). Closing the Gap: Strategic Planning for Healthcare Workforce Shortages Through 2030. Retrieved from (kaizenconsultservice.com)
• Kiplinger. (2025, October 15). Three Striking Ways the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Affects Nursing Homes. Retrieved from (kiplinger.com)
• Reuters. (2025, April 8). Judge blocks Biden rule requiring more staff at nursing homes. Retrieved from (reuters.com)
• Reuters. (2025, December 13). US Veterans Affairs agency plans health care job cuts, WaPo reports. Retrieved from (reuters.com)
• Time. (2023, August 15). Aging Americans Face Bleak Futures Unless We Let New Immigrants Help. Retrieved from (time.com)